Distributed Circuit Analysis and Design for Ultra-wideband Communication and sub-mm Wave Applications

This thesis explores research into new distributed circuit design techniques and topologies, developed to extend the bandwidth of amplifiers operating in the mm and sub-mm wave regimes, and in optical and visible light communication systems. Theoretical, mathematical modelling and simulation-based studies are presented, with detailed designs of new circuits based on distributed amplifier (DA) principles, and constructed using a double heterojunction bipolar transistor (DHBT) indium phosphide (InP) process with fT =fmax of 350/600 GHz. A single stage DA (SSDA) with bandwidth of 345 GHz and 8 dB gain, based on novel techniques developed in this work, shows 140% bandwidth improvement over the conventional DA design. Furthermore, the matrix-single stage DA (M-SSDA) is proposed for higher gain than both the conventional DA and matrix amplifier. A two-tier M-SSDA with 14 dB gain at 300 GHz bandwidth, and a three-tier M-SSDA with a gain of 20 dB at 324 GHz bandwidth, based on a cascode gain cell and optimized for bandwidth and gain flatness, are presented based on full foundry simulation tests. Analytical and simulation-based studies of the noise performance peculiarities of the SSDA and its multiplicative derivatives are also presented. The newly proposed circuits are fabricated as monolithic microwave integrated circuits (MMICs), with measurements showing 7.1 dB gain and 200 GHz bandwidth for the SSDA and 12 dB gain at 170 GHz bandwidth for the three-tier M-SSDA. Details of layout, fabrication and testing; and discussion of performance limiting factors and layout optimization considerations are presented. Drawing on the concept of artificial transmission line synthesis in distributed amplification, a new technique to achieve up to three-fold improvement in the modulation bandwidth of light emitting diodes (LEDs) for visible light communication (VLC) is introduced. The thesis also describes the design and application of analogue pre-emphasis to improve signal-to-noise ratio in bandwidth limited optical transceivers

InP DHBT Distributed Amplifiers With Up to 235-GHz Bandwidth

Three wideband amplifiers in double-heterojunction bipolar transistor technology have been designed and measured. The amplifiers use different types of distributed amplifier (DA) topologies, all based on cascode gain cells. A single-stage DA design achieves 7.5-dB gain and 192-GHz bandwidth and a two-cascaded single-stage DA achieves an average gain of 16 dB with a bandwidth of 235 GHz. The third circuit is a conventional DA with more than 10-dB gain from 70 kHz up to 180 GHz. To the authors' best knowledge, the single-stage DA and the two-cascaded single-stage DA are the widest band amplifiers in any technology reported to date. Furthermore, the conventional DA has a record bandwidth for circuits in conventional DA topology with gain from near dc

A Fully integrated D-band Direct-Conversion I/Q Transmitter and Receiver Chipset in SiGe BiCMOS Technology

This paper presents design and characterization of single-chip 110-170 GHz (D-band) direct conversion in-phase/quadrature-phase (I/Q) transmitter and receiver monolithic microwave integrated circuits (MMICs), realized in a 130 nm SiGe BiCMOS process with ft/fmax of 250 GHz/370 GHz. The chipset is suitable for low power wideband communication and can be used in both homodyne and heterodyne architectures. The Transmitter chip consists of a six-stage power amplifier, an I/Q modulator, and a LO multiplier chain. The LO multiplier chain consists of frequency sixtupler followed by a two-stage amplifier. It exhibits a single sideband conversion gain of 23 dB and saturated output power of 0 dBm. The 3 dB RF bandwidth is 31 GHz from 114 to 145 GHz. The receiver includes a low noise amplifier, I/Q demodulator and x6 multiplier chain at the LO port. The receiver provides a conversion gain of 27 dB and has a noise figure of 10 dB. It has 3 dB RF bandwidth of 28 GHz from 112-140 GHz. The transmitter and receiver have dc power consumption of 240 mW and 280 mW, respectively. The chip area of each transmitter and receiver circuit is 1.4 mm x 1.1 mm

A review of technologies and design techniques of millimeter-wave power amplifiers

his article reviews the state-of-the-art millimeter-wave (mm-wave) power amplifiers (PAs), focusing on broadband design techniques. An overview of the main solid-state technologies is provided, including Si, gallium arsenide (GaAs), GaN, and other III-V materials, and both field-effect and bipolar transistors. The most popular broadband design techniques are introduced, before critically comparing through the most relevant design examples found in the scientific literature. Given the wide breadth of applications that are foreseen to exploit the mm-wave spectrum, this contribution will represent a valuable guide for designers who need a single reference before adventuring in the challenging task of the mm-wave PA design

MMIC-based Low Phase Noise Millimetre-wave Signal Source Design

Wireless technology for future communication systems has been continuously evolving to meet society’s increasing demand on network capacity. The millimetre-wave frequency band has a large amount of bandwidth available, which is a key factor in enabling the capability of carrying higher data rates. However, a challenge with wideband systems is that the capacity of these systems is limited by the noise floor of the local oscillator (LO). The LO in today’s communication systems is traditionally generated at low frequency and subsequently multiplied using frequency multipliers, leading to a significant degradation of the LO noise floor at millimetre-wave frequencies. For this reason, the thesis considers low phase noise millimetre-wave signal source design optimised for future wideband millimetre-wave communications.In an oscillator, low frequency noise (LFN) is up-converted into phase noise around the microwave signal. Thus, aiming for low phase noise oscillator design, LFN characterisations and comparisons of several common III-V transistor technologies, e.g. GaAs-InGaP HBTs, GaAs pHEMTs, and GaN HEMTs, are carried out. It is shown that GaN HEMTs have good potential for oscillator applications where far-carrier phase noise performance is critical, e.g. wideband millimetre-wave communications. Since GaN HEMT is identified as an attractive technology for low noise floor oscillator applications, an in-depth study of some factors which affects LFN characteristics of III-N GaN HEMTs such as surface passivation methods and variations in transistor geometry are also investigated. It is found that the best surface passivation and deposition method can improve the LFN level of GaN HEMT devices significantly, resulting in a lower oscillator phase noise. Several MMIC GaN HEMT based oscillators including X-band Colpitts voltage-controlled-oscillators (VCOs) and Ka-band reflection type oscillators are demonstrated. It is verified that GaN HEMT based oscillators can reach a low noise floor. For instance, X-band GaN HEMT VCOs and a Ka-band GaN HEMT reflection type oscillator with 1 MHz phase noise performance of -135 dBc/Hz and -129 dBc/Hz, respectively, are demonstrated. These results are not only state-of-the-art for GaN HEMT oscillators, but also in-line with the best performance reported for GaAs-InGaP HBT based oscillators. Further, the MMIC oscillator designs are combined with accurate phase noise calculations based on a cyclostationary method and experimental LFN data. It has been seen that the measured and calculated phase noise agree well.The final part of this thesis covers low phase noise millimetre-wave signal source design and a comparison of different architectures and technological approaches. Specifically, a fundamental frequency 220 GHz oscillator is designed in advanced 130 nm InP DHBT process and a D-band signal source is based on the Ka-band GaN HEMT oscillator presented above and followed by a SiGe BiCMOS MMIC including a sixtupler and an amplifier. The Ka-band GaN HEMT oscillator is used to reach the critical low noise floor. The 220 GHz signal source presents an output power around 5 dBm, phase noise of -110 dBc/Hz at 10 MHz offset and a dc-to-RF efficiency in excess of 10% which is the highest number reported in open literature for a fundamental frequency signal source beyond 200 GHz. The D-band signal source, on the other hand, presents an output power of 5 dBm and phase noise of -128 dBc/Hz at 10 MHz offset from a 135 GHz carrier signal. Commenting on the performance of these two different millimetre-wave signal sources, the GaN HEMT/SiGe HBT source presents the best normalized phase noise at 10 MHz, while the integrated InP HBT oscillator demonstrates significantly better conversion efficiency and still a decent phase noise

Design and Analysis of Low-power Millimeter-Wave SiGe BiCMOS Circuits with Application to Network Measurement Systems

Interest in millimeter (mm-) wave frequencies covering the spectrum of 30-300 GHz has been steadily increasing. Advantages such as larger absolute bandwidth and smaller form-factor have made this frequency region attractive for numerous applications, including high-speed wireless communication, sensing, material science, health, automotive radar, and space exploration. Continuous development of silicon-germanium heterojunction bipolar transistor (SiGe HBT) and associated BiCMOS technology has achieved transistors with fT/fmax of 505/720 GHz and integration with 55 nm CMOS. Such accomplishment and predictions of beyond THz performance have made SiGe BiCMOS technology the most competitive candidate for addressing the aforementioned applications. Especially for mobile applications, a critical demand for future mm-wave applications will be low DC power consumption (Pdc), which requires a substantial reduction of supply voltage and current. Conventionally, reducing the supply voltage will lead to HBTs operating close to or in the saturation region, which is typically avoided in mm-wave circuits due to expectated performance degradation and often inaccurate models. However, due to only moderate speed reduction at the forward-biased base-collector voltage (VBC) up to 0.5 V and the accuracy of the compact model HICUM/L2 also in saturation, low-power mm-wave circuits with SiGe HBTs operating in saturation offer intriguing benefits, which have been explored in this thesis based on 130 nm SiGe BiCMOS technologies: • Different low-power mm-wave circuit blocks are discussed in detail, including low-noise amplifiers (LNAs), down-conversion mixers, and various frequency multipliers covering a wide frequency range from V-band (50-75 GHz) to G-band (140-220 GHz). • Aiming at realizing a better trade-off between Pdc and RF performance, a drastic decrease in supply voltage is realized with forward-biased VBC, forcing transistors of the circuits to operate in saturation. • Discussions contain the theoretical analysis of the key figure of merits (FoMs), topology and bias selection, device sizing, and performance enhancement techniques. • A 173-207 GHz low-power amplifier with 23 dB gain and 3.2 mW Pdc, and a 72-108 GHz low-power tunable amplifier with 10-23 dB gain and 4-21 mW Pdc were designed. • A 97 GHz low-power down-conversion mixer was presented with 9.6 dB conversion gain (CG) and 12 mW Pdc. • For multipliers, a 56-66 GHz low-power frequency quadrupler with -3.6 dB peak CG and 12 mW Pdc, and a 172-201 GHz low-power frequency tripler with -4 dB peak CG and 10.5 mW Pdc were realized. By cascading these two circuits, also a 176-193 GHz low-power ×12 multiplier was designed, achieving -11 dBm output power with only 26 mW Pdc. • An integrated 190 GHz low-power receiver was designed as one receiving channel of a G-band frequency extender specifically for a VNA-based measurement system. Another goal of this receiver is to explore the lowest possible Pdc while keeping its highly competitive RF performance for general applications requiring a wide LO tuning range. Apart from the low-power design method of circuit blocks, the careful analysis and distribution of the receiver FoMs are also applied for further reduction of the overall Pdc. Along this line, this receiver achieved a peak CG of 49 dB with a 14 dB tunning range, consuming only 29 mW static Pdc for the core part and 171 mW overall Pdc, including the LO chain. • All designs presented in this thesis were fabricated and characterized on-wafer. Thanks to the accurate compact model HICUM/L2, first-pass access was achieved for all circuits, and simulation results show excellent agreement with measurements. • Compared with recently published work, most of the designs in this thesis show extremely low Pdc with highly competitive key FoMs regarding gain, bandwidth, and noise figure. • The observed excellent measurement-simulation agreement enables the sensitivity analysis of each design for obtaining a deeper insight into the impact of transistor-related physical effects on critical circuit performance parameters. Such studies provide meaningful feedback for process improvement and modeling development.:Table of Contents Kurzfassung . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii Abstract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Motivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.2 Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 List of symbols and acronyms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2 Technology 7 2.1 Fabrication Technologies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2.1.1 SiGe HBT performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2.1.2 B11HFC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 2.1.3 SG13G2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 2.1.4 SG13D7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 2.2 Commonly Used Components . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 2.2.1 Grounded-sidewall-shielded microstrip line . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 2.2.2 Zero-impedance Transmission Line . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 2.2.3 Balun . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 2.2.3.1 Active Balun . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 2.2.3.2 Passive Balun . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 2.3 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 3 Low-power Low-noise Amplifiers 25 3.1 173-207 GHz Ultra-low-power Amplifier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 3.1.1 Topology Selection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 3.1.2 Bias Dependency of the Small-signal Performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 3.1.2.1 Bias . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 3.1.2.2 Bias vs Gain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 3.1.2.3 Bias vs Noise . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 3.1.2.4 Bias vs Stability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 3.1.3 Bias selection and Device sizing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 3.1.3.1 Bias Selection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 3.1.3.2 Device Sizing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 3.1.4 Performance Enhancement Technologies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 3.1.4.1 Gm-boosting Inductors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 3.1.4.2 Stability Enhancement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 3.1.4.3 Noise Improvement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 3.1.5 Circuit Realization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 3.1.5.1 Layout Scheme . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 3.1.5.2 Inductors Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 3.1.5.3 Dual-band Matching Network . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 3.1.5.4 Circuit Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 3.1.6 Results and Discussions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 3.1.6.1 Measurement Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 3.1.6.2 Measurement Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 3.1.6.3 Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 3.2 72-108 GHz Low-Power Tunable Amplifier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 3.2.1 Configuration, Sizing, and Bias Tuning Range . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 3.2.2 Regional Matching Network . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 3.2.2.1 Impedance Variation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 3.2.2.2 Regional Matching Network Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 3.2.3 Circuit Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 3.2.4 Results and Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 3.2.4.1 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 3.2.4.2 Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 3.3 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 4 Low-power Down-conversion Mixers 73 4.1 97 GHz Low-power Down-conversion Mixer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 4.1.1 Mixer Design and Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 4.1.1.1 Mixer Topology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 4.1.1.2 Bias Selection and Device Sizing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 4.1.1.3 Mixer Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 4.1.2 Results and Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 4.1.2.1 Measurement Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 4.1.2.2 Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 4.2 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 5 Low-power Multipliers 87 5.1 General Design Flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 5.2 56-66 GHz Low-power Frequency Quadrupler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 5.3 172-201 GHz Low-power Frequency Tripler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 5.4 176-193 GHz Low-power ×12 Frequency Multiplier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 5.5 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 6 Low-power Receivers 101 6.1 Receiver Performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101 6.2 LO Chain (×12) Integrated 190 GHz Low-Power Receiver . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 6.2.1 Receiver Architecture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 6.2.2 Low-power Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 6.2.3 Building Blocks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 6.2.3.1 LNA and LO DA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 6.2.3.2 Tunable Mixer and IF BA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111 6.2.3.3 65 GHz (V-band) Quadrupler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 6.2.3.4 G-band Tripler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120 6.2.4 Receiver Results and Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123 6.2.5 Measurement Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124 6.2.6 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124 6.3 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131 7 Conclusions 133 7.1 Summaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133 7.2 Outlook . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134 Bibliography 135 List of Figures 149 List of Tables 157 A Derivation of the Gm 159 A.1 Gm of standard cascode stage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159 A.2 Gm of cascode stage with Lcas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160 A.3 Gm of cascode stage with Lb . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161 B Derivation of Yin in the stability analysis 163 C Derivation of Zin and Zout 165 C.1 Zin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165 C.2 Zout . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167 D Derivation of the cascaded oP1dB 169 E Table of element values for the designed circuits 17