A methodology for the generation and evaluation of biorefinery process chains, in order to identify the most promising biorefineries for the EU

The topic of bioenergy, biofuels and bioproducts remains at the top of the current political and research agenda. Identification of the optimum processing routes for biomass, in terms of efficiency, cost, environment and socio-economics is vital as concern grows over the remaining fossil fuel resources, climate change and energy security. It is known that the only renewable way of producing conventional hydrocarbon fuels and organic chemicals is from biomass, but the problem remains of identifying the best product mix and the most efficient way of processing biomass to products. The aim is to move Europe towards a biobased economy and it is widely accepted that biorefineries are key to this development. A methodology was required for the generation and evaluation of biorefinery process chains for converting biomass into one or more valuable products that properly considers performance, cost, environment, socio-economics and other factors that influence the commercial viability of a process. In this thesis a methodology to achieve this objective is described. The completed methodology includes process chain generation, process modelling and subsequent analysis and comparison of results in order to evaluate alternative process routes. A modular structure was chosen to allow greater flexibility and allowing the user to generate a large number of different biorefinery configurations The significance of the approach is that the methodology is defined and is thus rigorous and consistent and may be readily re-examined if circumstances change. There was the requirement for consistency in structure and use, particularly for multiple analyses. It was important that analyses could be quickly and easily carried out to consider, for example, different scales, configurations and product portfolios and so that previous outcomes could be readily reconsidered. The result of the completed methodology is the identification of the most promising biorefinery chains from those considered as part of the European Biosynergy Project

A methodology for the generation and evaluation of biorefinery process chains, in order to identify the most promising biorefineries for the EU

The topic of bioenergy, biofuels and bioproducts remains at the top of the current political and research agenda. Identification of the optimum processing routes for biomass, in terms of efficiency, cost, environment and socio-economics is vital as concern grows over the remaining fossil fuel resources, climate change and energy security. It is known that the only renewable way of producing conventional hydrocarbon fuels and organic chemicals is from biomass, but the problem remains of identifying the best product mix and the most efficient way of processing biomass to products. The aim is to move Europe towards a biobased economy and it is widely accepted that biorefineries are key to this development. A methodology was required for the generation and evaluation of biorefinery process chains for converting biomass into one or more valuable products that properly considers performance, cost, environment, socio-economics and other factors that influence the commercial viability of a process. In this thesis a methodology to achieve this objective is described. The completed methodology includes process chain generation, process modelling and subsequent analysis and comparison of results in order to evaluate alternative process routes. A modular structure was chosen to allow greater flexibility and allowing the user to generate a large number of different biorefinery configurations The significance of the approach is that the methodology is defined and is thus rigorous and consistent and may be readily re-examined if circumstances change. There was the requirement for consistency in structure and use, particularly for multiple analyses. It was important that analyses could be quickly and easily carried out to consider, for example, different scales, configurations and product portfolios and so that previous outcomes could be readily reconsidered. The result of the completed methodology is the identification of the most promising biorefinery chains from those considered as part of the European Biosynergy Project.EThOS - Electronic Theses Online ServiceGBUnited Kingdo

A MULTIDISCIPLINARY TECHNO-ECONOMIC DECISION SUPPORT TOOL FOR VALIDATING LONG-TERM ECONOMIC VIABILITY OF BIOREFINING PROCESSES

Increasing demand for energy and transportation fuel has motivated researchers all around the world to explore alternatives for a long-term sustainable source of energy. Biomass is one such renewable resource that can be converted into various marketable products by the process of biorefining. Currently, research is taking strides in developing conversion techniques for producing biofuels from multiple bio-based feedstocks. However, the greatest concern with emerging processes is the long-term viability as a sustainable source of energy. Hence, a framework is required that can incorporate novel and existing processes to validate their economic, environmental and social potential in satisfying present energy demands, without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own energy needs. This research focuses on developing a framework that can incorporate fundamental research to determine its long-term viability, simultaneously providing critical techno-economic and decision support information to various stakeholders. This contribution links various simulation and optimization models to create a decision support tool, to estimate the viability of biorefining options in any given region. Multiple disciplines from the Process Systems Engineering and Supply Chain Management are integrated to develop the comprehensive framework. Process simulation models for thermochemical and biochemical processes are developed and optimized using Aspen Engineering Suite. Finally, for validation, the framework is analyzed by combining the outcomes of the process simulation with the supply chain models. The developed techno-economic model takes into account detailed variable costs and capital investments for various conversion processes. Subsequently, case studies are performed to demonstrate the applicability of the decision support tool for the Jackson Purchase region of Western Kentucky. The multidisciplinary framework is a unique contribution in the field of Process Systems Engineering as it demonstrates simulation of process optimization models and illustrates its iterative linking with the supply chain optimization models to estimate the economics of biorefinery from multi-stakeholder perspective. This informative tool not only assists in comparing modes of operation but also forecasts the effect of future scenarios, such as, utilization of marginal land for planting dedicated energy crops and incorporation of emerging enzymatic processes. The resulting framework is novel and informative in assisting investors, policy makers and other stakeholders for evaluating the impacts of biorefining. The results obtained supports the generalizability of this tool to be applied in any given region and guide stakeholders in making financial and strategic decisions

On the design of a European bioeconomy that optimally contributes to sustainable development

The inevitability for a change in humankind's resource and fossil energy consumption is demonstrated by global crises such as the climate change, disturbances of natural cycles, and the loss of biodiversity. The sun provides sufficient energy to generate electricity and by photosynthesis, solar radiation is converted into energy chemically bound in biomolecules, which provide building blocks for the production of various materials, chemicals, or fuels. The bioeconomy puts biomass at the center of an economy that attempts to cover resource and energy demand by renewable materials to address the global challenges. However, the finiteness of the terrestrial surface limits renewables, requiring a prioritization of use. The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) provide a common ground for global peace, prosperity, improved health and education, reduced inequality, and spur economic growth while tackling climate change and biodiversity loss, making it the most comprehensive framework for defining objectives in the design of the bioeconomy. Against this background, this dissertation is particularly dedicated to the design of bioeconomic value chains based on agroforestry residues in the European Union, considering economic, environmental, and social objectives to optimally exploit the potential to contribute to a sustainable development. All objectives are matched to SDGs to unveil congruencies, conflicts and trade-offs between different goals, and to provide aggregated insights and courses of action in the agroforestry residue-based bioeconomy to politics, the scientific community, and corporate decision-makers. The availability of agroforestry residue volumes and their current uses is the first major concern of a bioeconomy aligned with the SDGs to be assessed in this work. Key findings are that the most promising agricultural residue in the EU is wheat straw, followed by maize stover, barley straw, and rapeseed straw, which together account for about 80% of EU’s cereals and oil crops residues. In forestry, waste bark from the two coniferous species, spruce and pine, are most promising with the highest supplies in Scandinavia and central EU. The time-series-based forecast model predicts a total increase of the bioeconomic potential of the prioritized agricultural feedstocks from 113 Mt in 2017 to 127 Mt in 2030. The forecast indicates the largest increase of all investigated crops for corn stover at up to 20% until 2030, while rapeseed straw production is forecasted to decrease in many regions. To take environmental and social aspects into account on a regional level, along with international competitiveness, this dissertation develops a multi-criteria strategic network design model for the planning of bioeconomic value chains. The environmental and social objectives are derived by means of Life Cycle Assessment and Social Life Cycle Assessment, respectively. The developed set of 35 economic, environmental, and social objective functions allows for the consideration of 16 of the 17 SDGs. The model is applied for the planning of a second-generation bioethanol production network based on agricultural residues in the EU. Single-criteria optimization shows that sustainably available agroforestry residues could substitute up to 22% of the petrol demand in the EU in 2018 under optimal production networks for certain objectives (i.a., global warming). For environmental objectives, the decision to substitute petrol or edible crops-based ethanol has the highest impact. The greenhouse gas benefits could amount to up to 59 Mt CO2 eq., conforming to about 1.35% of the EU’s 2018 total emissions. However, global warming optimization leads to opportunity costs for other objectives. While for ecosystem quality, for example, the achieved value reaches 50% of its optimum, other categories like land use and water consumption could even be net deteriorated by optimizing global warming. For objectives such as land use, only 19% of the total agroforestry residues is used to substitute 100% of the edible crops-based ethanol, which would free up 11.7 billion m2 crop land. Social objectives lead to large and labor-intensive production networks distributed all over the EU. Depending on the social objective, the value creation slightly shifts regionally. To optimize local employment, the network relocates to regions with high unemployment rates, such as Spain, Italy, and parts of France. Economically strong metropolitan regions are at a disadvantage in favor of weaker regions of Central and Eastern EU when optimizing economic development. At best, up to 140,000 new jobs could be created in the EU while 12,000 jobs could be lost due to substitution of reference products. In terms of network extend, most socially and environmentally optimal production networks are similar, although the substitution decision has little impact for social objectives. This means that interesting trade-offs between social and environmental objectives can be found with only minor sacrifices. Economically optimal networks are much smaller and more centralized than environmental ones, and lead to costs of about 0.75 €/l second-generation ethanol. Environmental optimization results in cost between 0.88 €/l to 2.00 €/l, which implies that large-scale bioethanol production is not economically feasible with today’s oil prices and taxes. While the single-criteria optimization reveals conflicts within and between the environment, social, and economic dimensions, Pareto optimization is conducted to unveil trade-offs between conflicting goals. Significant environmental and social benefits can often be realized with only small economic detriments, and vice versa, economic profitability can substantially be improved at low environmental opportunity cost. Furthermore, the applied Pareto optimization shows that the endpoints human health and ecosystem quality are suitable aggregators of environmental impact categories, wherefore they could serve as representative of the environmental dimension in decision-making. Nonetheless, a transparent consideration of a broad range of impacts and knowledge about the categories’ contributions remains indispensable to reveal possible negative consequences of a decision. In a final step, the objective functions are matched to SDGs, and opportunity cost between the objective functions are calculated to unveil congruencies and conflicts between different goals. The assessment of relationships between the different SDGs supports the perception that different aspects of sustainability are not equally directed. Sustainability, expressed by the SDGs, is rather case-specific and varies between a multitude of interdependent social, environmental, and economic criteria. Decision-makers, whether at the corporate level pursuing one or more business objectives or at the policy level, using the SDGs as a framework, should be aware of the reciprocities between the different criteria. The dissertation shows that the European bioeconomy has a great potential to contribute to sustainable development. Multi-criteria optimization models enable sound trade-off decisions that are aligned to the SDGs

Macroalgal biorefinery concepts for the circular bioeconomy: A review on biotechnological developments and future perspectives

The imminent need for transition to a circular bioeconomy, based on the valorisation of renewable biomass feedstocks, will ameliorate global challenges induced by climate change, environmental pollution and population growth. A reduced reliance on depleting fossil fuel resources and ensured production of eco-friendly and cost-effective bioproducts and biofuels, requires the development of sustainable biorefinery processes, with many utilising macroalgae as feedstock, showing promising and viable prospects. Nonetheless, macroalgal biorefinery research is still in its infancy compared to lignocellulosic biorefineries that utilise terrestrial plants. This article presents a review on the latest scientific literature associated with the development and status of macroalgal biorefineries, and how bioproducts generated from these bioprocesses have contributed towards the bioeconomy. The fundamental need to understand how the unique biochemical composition of macroalgae fit within a biorefinery concept are explained, alongside discussion of the novel biotechnologies that have been applied. In order to comprehend the increasing significance of this exciting field, the review will also provide insight, for the first time, on the current global funding and intellectual property landscape related to macroalgae and their implementation across the entire biorefinery concept. Imperative areas for further research and development, to bridge the gap between fundamental bioscience in the laboratory and the successful application of compatible biotechnologies at a commercial scale, to boost the macroalgae industry are also covered

Biowaste management in Italy: Challenges and perspectives

The aim of this work is the development of a methodology for the technical and environmental assessment of biowaste valorization in 2G biorefineries. Italy was chosen as case study, considering years 2016–2017. Approach: the Italian context was evaluated through the following key parameters: Gross domestic power, climate, demography, and population density distribution described the Italian framework. The four most abundant biowaste categories were defined through their amounts and geo-localization: wastewater and sewage sludge (WSS, 4.06 Mt/y), organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW, 1.7 Mt/y), agricultural livestock waste (ALW, 5.7 Mt/y), and waste deriving from the food industry (FIW, 2.6 Mt/y). The geo-localization and quantitative evaluations of the available biowaste amounts were aimed at defining the dimension and localization of the biorefinery plant and at optimizing supply and transport chains, while the qualitative characteristic were aimed to evaluate the most promising process among thermo-valorization (TH) and anaerobic digestion (AD). Results: All considered biowastes were appropriate for biorefinery processes, since carbon content exceeds 40% and the carbon–nitrogen ratio was between 10 and 30. All biowaste categories were evaluated as feedstocks for two biorefinery processes: anaerobic digestion (AD) and thermo-valorization (TH) with energy recovery. Compared to TH, AD achieved in all cases the best performances in terms of produced energy and avoided CO2 emissions. The primary energy production of AD and TH for WSS, OFMSW, ALW, and FIW were respectively: 7.89 vs. 2.4 kWh/kg; 8.7 vs. 2.6 kWh/kg; 10.85 vs. 5.5 kWh/kg; and 12.5 vs. 7.8 kWh/kg. The main findings of this work were: the adoption of AD was technically more suitable than TH; AD increased the avoided CO2 emissions of 10%–89.9% depending on biowaste category

Bridging the Gaps for a ‘Circular’ Bioeconomy: Selection Criteria, Bio-Based Value Chain and Stakeholder Mapping

Bio-products and bio-based value chains have been identified as one of the most promising pathways to attaining a resource-efficient circular economy. Such a “valorization and value-addition” approach incorporates an intricate network of processes and actors, contributing to socio-economic growth, environmental benefits and technological advances. In the present age of limited time and funding models to achieve ambitious sustainable development targets, whilst mitigating climate change, a systematic approach employing two-tier multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) can be useful in supporting the identification of promising bio-based value chains, that are significant to the EU plans for the bio-economy. Their identification is followed by an elaborate mapping of their value chains to visualize/foresee the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and challenges attributable to those bio-based value chains. To demonstrate this methodology, a systematic review of 12 bio-based value chains, prevalent in the EU, sourcing their starting material from biomass and bio-waste, has been undertaken. The selected value chains are mapped to visualize the linkages and interactions between the different stages, chain actors, employed conversion routes, product application and existing/potential end-of-life options. This approach will help chain-actors, particularly investors and policy-makers, understand the complexities of such multi-actor systems and make informed decisions