37 research outputs found

    Enclosings of Decompositions of Complete Multigraphs in 22-Edge-Connected rr-Factorizations

    Full text link
    A decomposition of a multigraph GG is a partition of its edges into subgraphs G(1),…,G(k)G(1), \ldots , G(k). It is called an rr-factorization if every G(i)G(i) is rr-regular and spanning. If GG is a subgraph of HH, a decomposition of GG is said to be enclosed in a decomposition of HH if, for every 1≤i≤k1 \leq i \leq k, G(i)G(i) is a subgraph of H(i)H(i). Feghali and Johnson gave necessary and sufficient conditions for a given decomposition of λKn\lambda K_n to be enclosed in some 22-edge-connected rr-factorization of μKm\mu K_{m} for some range of values for the parameters nn, mm, λ\lambda, μ\mu, rr: r=2r=2, μ>λ\mu>\lambda and either m≥2n−1m \geq 2n-1, or m=2n−2m=2n-2 and μ=2\mu = 2 and λ=1\lambda=1, or n=3n=3 and m=4m=4. We generalize their result to every r≥2r \geq 2 and m≥2n−2m \geq 2n - 2. We also give some sufficient conditions for enclosing a given decomposition of λKn\lambda K_n in some 22-edge-connected rr-factorization of μKm\mu K_{m} for every r≥3r \geq 3 and m=(2−C)nm = (2 - C)n, where CC is a constant that depends only on rr, λ\lambda and~μ\mu.Comment: 17 pages; fixed the proof of Theorem 1.4 and other minor change

    Gauge theory and Rasmussen's invariant

    Get PDF
    A previous paper of the authors' contained an error in the proof of a key claim, that Rasmussen's knot-invariant s(K) is equal to its gauge-theory counterpart. The original paper is included here together with a corrigendum, indicating which parts still stand and which do not. In particular, the gauge-theory counterpart of s(K) is not additive for connected sums.Comment: This version bundles the original submission with a 1-page corrigendum, indicating the error. The new version of the corrigendum points out that the invariant is not additive for connected sums. 23 pages, 3 figure

    A survey on constructive methods for the Oberwolfach problem and its variants

    Full text link
    The generalized Oberwolfach problem asks for a decomposition of a graph GG into specified 2-regular spanning subgraphs F1,…,FkF_1,\ldots, F_k, called factors. The classic Oberwolfach problem corresponds to the case when all of the factors are pairwise isomorphic, and GG is the complete graph of odd order or the complete graph of even order with the edges of a 11-factor removed. When there are two possible factor types, it is called the Hamilton-Waterloo problem. In this paper we present a survey of constructive methods which have allowed recent progress in this area. Specifically, we consider blow-up type constructions, particularly as applied to the case when each factor consists of cycles of the same length. We consider the case when the factors are all bipartite (and hence consist of even cycles) and a method for using circulant graphs to find solutions. We also consider constructions which yield solutions with well-behaved automorphisms.Comment: To be published in the Fields Institute Communications book series. 23 pages, 2 figure
    corecore