200 research outputs found

    Fracture resistance of zirconia-composite veneered crowns in comparison with zirconia-porcelain crowns.

    Get PDF
    The objectives were to evaluate the fracture resistance and stress concentration in zirconia/composite veneered crowns in comparison to zirconia/porcelain crowns using occlusal fracture resistance and by stress analysis using finite element analysis method. Zirconia substructures were divided into two groups based on the veneering material. A static load was applied occlusally using a ball indenter and the load to fracture was recorded in Newtons (N). The same crown design was used to create 3D crown models and evaluated using FEA. The zirconia/composite crowns subjected to static occlusal load showed comparable results to the zirconia/porcelain crowns. Zirconia/composite crowns showed higher stress on the zirconia substructure at 63.6 and 50.9 MPa on the zirconia substructure veneered with porcelain. In conclusion, zirconia/composite crowns withstood high occlusal loads similar to zirconia/porcelain crowns with no significant difference. However, the zirconia/composite crowns showed higher stress values than the zirconia/porcelain crowns at the zirconia substructure

    Class II MOD ์ง์ ‘ ๋ณตํ•ฉ ๋ ˆ์ง„ ์ˆ˜๋ณต ์‹œ ๊ธฐ์ €์žฌ์˜ ์ข…๋ฅ˜์™€ ๋‘๊ป˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์‘๋ ฅ ๋ถ„ํฌ์˜ ๋น„๊ต: ์‚ผ์ฐจ์› ์œ ํ•œ ์š”์†Œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (์„์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์น˜์˜ํ•™๋Œ€ํ•™์› ์น˜์˜๊ณผํ•™๊ณผ, 2020. 8. ์„œ๋•๊ทœ.1. Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the stress distribution of different base materials and thicknesses in posterior direct MOD class II resin restoration. 2. Material and methods Nine 3D models of teeth obtained from CBCT scan data were fabricated and analyzed through 3D CAD software (ABAQUS CAE 2016, Dassault systems, Velizy-Villacoublay, France). The experimental groups of 3D models were categorized as follows: Control: Sound tooth Group A: Composite resin without base material Group B: Lithium disilicate with resin cement layer Group C-tn: Composite resin with glass ionomer cement base 0.5 mm Group C-tk: Composite resin with glass ionomer cement base 1.0 mm Group D-tn: Composite resin with low-viscosity resin base 0.5 mm Group D-tk: Composite resin with low-viscosity resin base 1.0 mm Group E-tn: Composite resin with tricalcium silicate cement base 0.5 mm Group E-tk: Composite resin with tricalcium silicate cement base 1.0 mm Group C, D, E had multi-layer construction consisted of adhesive layer, base and composite resin. Then these groups were further divided into two sub-groups: thin (tn) and thick (tk). Stress distribution of all groups were compared and analyzed by visualizing maximum principal stress of each model after simulation of vertical loading with 600 N on occlusal surface. Polymerization shrinkage effect on resin-based materials was applied in prior to vertical loading. 3. Results Sound tooth showed lowest stress value and its stress propagation was confined on outer enamel surfaces only. Group A showed highest stress distribution along interfaces between tooth and restoration with increased failure risk on marginal area. In contrast, Group B showed the lowest maximum stress value among all groups although the stress was concentrated on resin cement layer. Group C, D, E both in thin and thick subgroups showed reduced stress level compared to Group A. However, differences in stress distribution between base materials and base thicknesses of 0.5 mm and 1.0 mm were not significant. 4. Conclusion Marginal stress caused by polymerization shrinkage of composite resin was reduced by presence of GIC, low-viscosity resin and tricalcium silicate cement bases in class II MOD direct composite resin. However, influence of different base materials and thicknesses of 0.5 mm and 1.0 mm on stress distribution of tooth and composite resin was not observed.1. ๋ชฉ ์  ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ชฉ์ ์€ Class II MOD ์ง์ ‘ ๋ณตํ•ฉ ๋ ˆ์ง„ ์ˆ˜๋ณต ์‹œ Base ์žฌ๋ฃŒ์˜ ์ข…๋ฅ˜ ๋ฐ ๋‘๊ป˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์‘๋ ฅ ๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ 3D ์œ ํ•œ ์š”์†Œ ํ•ด์„๋ฒ•์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋น„๊ต ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. 2. ๋ฐฉ ๋ฒ• CBCT-scan ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ 9๊ฐœ์˜ ์‚ผ์ฐจ์› ์น˜์•„ ๋ชจํ˜•์„ ์œ ํ•œ์š”์†Œ ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด (Abaqus CAE 2016, Dassault systems, Velizy-Villacoublay, France)๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•ด ์ œ์ž‘ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ํ˜•์„ฑ๋œ ์œ ํ•œ์š”์†Œ ๋ชจํ˜•์˜ ์‹คํ—˜๊ตฐ์„ ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์ด ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. Control Group: ์ •์ƒ ์น˜์•„ (Sound tooth) Group A: Base๋ฅผ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ์ง์ ‘ ์ˆ˜๋ณต Composite Resin Group B: Resin luting cement๋ฅผ ์ ์šฉํ•œ ๊ฐ„์ ‘ ์ˆ˜๋ณต Lithium disilicate Group C-tn: Composite resin ๊ณผ Glass ionomer cement base 0.5 mm Group C-tk: Composite resin ๊ณผ Glass ionomer cement base 1.0 mm Group D-tn: Composite resin ๊ณผ Low-viscosity resin base 0.5 mm Group D-tk: Composite resin ๊ณผ Low-viscosity resin base 1.0 mm Group E-tn: Composite resin ๊ณผ Tricalcium silicate cement base 0.5 mm Group E-tk: Composite resin ๊ณผ Tricalcium silicate cement base 1.0 mm Group C, D, E ๋Š” ๊ณตํ†ต์ ์œผ๋กœ adhesive layer ์™€ base ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  composite resin ์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋œ ๋‹ค์ธต ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋กœ ํ˜•์„ฑ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด 3 ๊ฐœ์˜ ๊ทธ๋ฃน์„ ๋‹ค์‹œ ๋‘๊ป˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ thin (Tn, 0.5 mm) ๊ณผ thick (Tk, 1.0 mm), 2 ๊ฐœ์˜ ์„ธ๋ถ€ ๊ทธ๋ฃน์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜๋ˆ„์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ ˆ์ง„ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ๋“ค์˜ ์ค‘ํ•ฉ ์ˆ˜์ถ• ํšจ๊ณผ์™€ ํ•จ๊ป˜ 600 N ์˜ ์ˆ˜์งํ•˜์ค‘์„ ๊ตํ•ฉ๋ฉด์— ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ชจ๋“  ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ชจํ˜•๋“ค์˜ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์ฃผ ์‘๋ ฅ (Maximum principal stress) ๋ถ„ํฌ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ๋„ํ‘œ ๋ฐ ๊ทธ๋ฆผ์œผ๋กœ ์‹œ๊ฐํ™” ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋น„๊ต ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. 3. ๊ฒฐ ๊ณผ ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ์—์„œ๋Š” ์‘๋ ฅ ๋ถ„ํฌ๊ฐ€ ๋ฒ•๋ž‘์งˆ์— ๊ตญํ•œ๋˜์–ด ๊ณ ๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ๋ถ„์‚ฐ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ๋ชจ๋“  ์‹คํ—˜๊ตฐ ์ค‘ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋‚ฎ์€ ์‘๋ ฅ ๊ฐ’์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. Group A ์—์„œ๋Š” ์น˜์•„์™€ ์ˆ˜๋ณต๋ฌผ์˜ ๊ณ„๋ฉด์„ ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋†’์€ ์‘๋ ฅ ๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ํŠนํžˆ ๋ณ€์—ฐ์—์„œ ํŒŒ์ ˆ ์œ„ํ—˜์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. Group B์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ์„ ์ œ์™ธํ•œ ๋ชจ๋“  ๊ตฐ์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋‚ฎ์€ ์‘๋ ฅ ๊ฐ’์„ ๋ณด์˜€์œผ๋‚˜ Resin cement layer ์— ์ง‘์ค‘๋œ ์‘๋ ฅ์ด ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. Group C, D, E์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ Group A์™€ ๋น„๊ตํ–ˆ์„ ์‹œ Group C, D, E ๋ชจ๋‘ ์ค‘ํ•ฉ ์ˆ˜์ถ•์— ์˜ํ•œ ์‘๋ ฅ์„ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œ์ผฐ์œผ๋‚˜, Base์˜ ์ข…๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์‘๋ ฅ ๋ถ„ํฌ์— ์œ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด๋Š” ์—†์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ 0.5 mm ๊ณผ 1.0 mm์˜ ๋‘๊ป˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์‘๋ ฅ ๋ถ„ํฌ์— ์ฐจ์ด๋Š” ์—†์—ˆ๋‹ค. 4. ๊ฒฐ ๋ก  Class II MOD ์ง์ ‘ ๋ ˆ์ง„ ์ˆ˜๋ณต ์‹œ, Base์˜ ์ ์šฉ์€ ์ค‘ํ•ฉ ์ˆ˜์ถ•์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ์‘๋ ฅ์„ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œ์ผฐ์œผ๋‚˜ Base ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ์ข…๋ฅ˜์˜ ์ฐจ์ด ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  0.5 mm ๊ณผ 1.0 mm์˜ ๋‘๊ป˜ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์‘๋ ฅ์˜ ๋ถ„ํฌ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์€ ์—†์—ˆ๋‹ค.I. Introduction........................................... 1 II. Material and Methods........................... 4 III. Results.................................................. 7 IV. Discussion............................................ 9 V. Conclusion............................................. 12 References................................................. 13 Tables and Figures.................................... 17 Abstract (in Korean)................................. 28Maste

    Operative Dentistry

    Get PDF

    Effect of cavity preparation design and ceramic type on the stress distribution, strain and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM onlays in molars

    Get PDF
    Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the cavity preparation and ceramic type on the stress distribution, tooth strain, fracture resistance and fracture mode of human molar teeth restored with onlays. Material and Methods: Forty-eight molars were divided into four groups (n=12) with assorted combinations of two study factors: BL- conventional onlay preparation with boxes made from leucite ceramic (IPS-Empress CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent); NBL- conservative onlay preparation without boxes made from leucite ceramic; BD- conventional onlay preparation with boxes made from lithium disilicate glass ceramic (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent); NBL- conservative onlay preparation with boxes made from lithium disilicate glass ceramic cuspal deformation (ยตS) was measured at 100 N and at maximum fracture load using strain gauge. Fracture resistance (N) was measured using a compression test, and the fracture mode was recorded. Finite element analysis was used to evaluate the stress distribution by modified von Mises stress criteria. The tooth strain and fracture resistance data were analyzed using the Tukey test and two-way ANOVA, and the fracture mode was analyzed by the chi-square test (ฮฑ=0.05). Results: The leucite ceramic resulted in higher tooth deformation at 100 N and lower tooth deformation at the maximum fracture load than the lithium disilicate ceramic (P<0.001). The lithium disilicate ceramic exhibited higher fracture resistance than the leucite ceramic (P<0.001). The conservative onlay resulted in higher fracture strength for lithium disilicate ceramic. Finite element analysis results showed the conventional cavity preparation resulted in higher stress concentration in the ceramic restoration and remaining tooth than the conservative onlay preparation. The conservative onlays exhibited increased fracture resistance, reduced stress concentration and more favorable fracture modes. Conclusion: Molars restored with lithium disilicate CAD-CAM ceramic onlays exhibited higher fracture resistance than molars restored with leucite CAD-CAM ceramic onlays

    Functional Biomimetic Dental Restoration

    Get PDF
    Bioinspired functionally graded approach is an innovative material technology, which has rapidly progressed both in terms of materials processing and computational modeling in recent years. Bioinspired functionally graded structure allows the integration of dissimilar materials without formation of severe internal stress and combines diverse properties into a single material system. It is a remarkable example of natureโ€™s ability to engineer functionally graded dental prostheses. Therefore, this novel technology is designed to improve the performance of the materials in medical and dental fields. Thus, this chapter book reviews the current status of the functionally graded dental prostheses and biomimetic process inspired by the human bone, enamel and dentin-enamel junction (DEJ) structures and the linear gradation in Youngโ€™s modulus of the human bone, enamel and dentin-enamel junction, as a new material design approach, to improve the performance compared to traditional dental prostheses. Notable research is highlighted regarding application of biomimetic prostheses into various fields in dentistry. The current chapter book will open a new avenue for recent researches aimed at the further development of new dental prostheses for improving their clinical durability

    The impact of restorative material and ceramic thickness on CAD\CAM endocrowns

    Get PDF
    Endocrown restorations as a conservative approach to restore endodontically treated teeth still need in vitro investigation under fatigue and made in different materials. This study evaluated the effect of restorative material and restoration thickness on the maximum fracture load of endocrowns subjected to cyclic loading. Sixty (60) third molar teeth received an endocrown preparation with three different heights of remaining dental tissue (1.5, 3.0 or 4.5 mm). A leucite-based ceramic (LEU) and a lithium disilicate (LD) based ceramic were selected to manufacture the CAD/CAM endocrown restorations, totaling 6 groups (n=10). The specimens were subjected to fatigue loading (200N, 2 x 106 cycles, water) and then to the single load to failure test (1 mm/min crosshead speed). Data were analyzed by using two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests (p< 0.05). All endocrowns survived the fatigue test. The thickness did not influence the restoration?s fracture load (p=0.548) instead the restorative material (p=0.003). LD showed higher mean values (1714.43 N)A than LEU (1313.47 N)B. Endocrowns manufactured with CAD/CAM lithium disilicate blocks showed superior fracture load than the leucite-based blocks after mechanical fatigue. Nevertheless, both materials presented acceptable survival and fracture load as long as the material?s minimum thickness and the enamel adhesion are respected

    Effect of framework type on survival probability of implant-supported temporary crowns : an in vitro study

    Get PDF
    This in vitro study evaluated the effect of framework type on the survival probability of temporary implant-supported crowns and on the implant platform structure after dynamic fatigue. Thirty (30) external hexagon implants (3.75 x 10 mm) were embedded in acrylic resin following the ISO-14801. Standardized temporary crowns (n=10, N=30) were manufactured in acrylic resin and divided according to the framework type: Total plastic, Plastic with CoCr base and Titanium. The crowns were installed onto the implants (20N.cm) and fatigued (100N, 2 Hz) to determine the crowns? survival probability for missions of 300.000 and 600.000 cycles. Fatigue data were submitted to the Kaplan-Meier test followed by Wilcoxon and Log Rank, all with ? = 5%. The implant platforms were parametrically inspected based on the scanning before and after the fatigue to evaluate the damage. The strain values were analyzed using One-way ANOVA and Tukey test, all with ? = 5%. ANOVA revealed that the Total plastic showed less implant damage (-0.07 ยฑ -0.03 mm) than the Plastic with CoCr base (-0.08 ยฑ -0.04 mm) and the Titanium (-0.10 ยฑ -0.01 mm) frameworks. Therefore, the framework type to manufacture implant-supported temporary crowns influences the fatigue survival of the restoration and the implant platform damage. The Plastic with CoCr base and Titanium frameworks showed superior reliability than the Total plastic framework which could not survive 600,000 cycles. The Plastic with CoCr base and the Titanium framework are suitable for restorations over 3 months in use, without a difference in the implant platform damage

    Influence of adhesive technique and thermomechanical fatigue on the fracture strength of minimally invasive CAD/CAM occlusal veneers

    Get PDF
    With the development of new CAD/CAM restorative dental materials, limited data regarding their survival rate and fracture strength are available when they are used as occlusal veneers. Therfore, These materials could be evaluated under conditions similar to those of the oral environment before being recommended for clinical use . For that reason, the influence of thermomechanical fatigue and adhesive bonding technique (etch-and-rinse and self-etching ) on the survivability and fracture strength for four different CAD/CAM materials were evaluated in this study

    Three-dimensional finite element analysis of anterior two-unit cantilever resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses

    Get PDF
    The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different framework materials on biomechanical behaviour of anterior two-unit cantilever resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses (RBFDPs). A three-dimensional finite element model of a two-unit cantilever RBFDP replacing amaxillary lateral incisorwas created. Five frameworkmaterialswere evaluated: direct fibre-reinforced composite (FRC-Z250), indirect fibre-reinforced composite (FRC-ES), gold alloy (M), glass ceramic (GC), and zirconia (ZI). Finite element analysis was performed and stress distribution was evaluated. A similar stress pattern, with stress concentrations in the connector area, was observed in RBFDPs for all materials.Maximal principal stress showed a decreasing order: ZI >M>GC> FRC-ES > FRCZ250. The maximum displacement of RBFDPs was higher for FRC-Z250 and FRC-ES than for M, GC, and ZI. FE analysis depicted differences in location of the maximum stress at the luting cement interface between materials. For FRC-Z250 and FRC-ES, the maximum stress was located in the upper part of the proximal area of the retainer, whereas, for M, GC, and ZI, the maximum stress was located at the cervical outline of the retainer. The present study revealed differences in biomechanical behaviour between all RBFDPs.The general observation was that a RBFDP made of FRC provided a more favourable stress distribution
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore