3,930 research outputs found
3D Visibility Representations of 1-planar Graphs
We prove that every 1-planar graph G has a z-parallel visibility
representation, i.e., a 3D visibility representation in which the vertices are
isothetic disjoint rectangles parallel to the xy-plane, and the edges are
unobstructed z-parallel visibilities between pairs of rectangles. In addition,
the constructed representation is such that there is a plane that intersects
all the rectangles, and this intersection defines a bar 1-visibility
representation of G.Comment: Appears in the Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on
Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2017
Grid-Obstacle Representations with Connections to Staircase Guarding
In this paper, we study grid-obstacle representations of graphs where we
assign grid-points to vertices and define obstacles such that an edge exists if
and only if an -monotone grid path connects the two endpoints without
hitting an obstacle or another vertex. It was previously argued that all planar
graphs have a grid-obstacle representation in 2D, and all graphs have a
grid-obstacle representation in 3D. In this paper, we show that such
constructions are possible with significantly smaller grid-size than previously
achieved. Then we study the variant where vertices are not blocking, and show
that then grid-obstacle representations exist for bipartite graphs. The latter
has applications in so-called staircase guarding of orthogonal polygons; using
our grid-obstacle representations, we show that staircase guarding is
\textsc{NP}-hard in 2D.Comment: To appear in the proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on
Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2017
Pixel and Voxel Representations of Graphs
We study contact representations for graphs, which we call pixel
representations in 2D and voxel representations in 3D. Our representations are
based on the unit square grid whose cells we call pixels in 2D and voxels in
3D. Two pixels are adjacent if they share an edge, two voxels if they share a
face. We call a connected set of pixels or voxels a blob. Given a graph, we
represent its vertices by disjoint blobs such that two blobs contain adjacent
pixels or voxels if and only if the corresponding vertices are adjacent. We are
interested in the size of a representation, which is the number of pixels or
voxels it consists of.
We first show that finding minimum-size representations is NP-complete. Then,
we bound representation sizes needed for certain graph classes. In 2D, we show
that, for -outerplanar graphs with vertices, pixels are
always sufficient and sometimes necessary. In particular, outerplanar graphs
can be represented with a linear number of pixels, whereas general planar
graphs sometimes need a quadratic number. In 3D, voxels are
always sufficient and sometimes necessary for any -vertex graph. We improve
this bound to for graphs of treewidth and to
for graphs of genus . In particular, planar graphs
admit representations with voxels
Visibility Representations of Boxes in 2.5 Dimensions
We initiate the study of 2.5D box visibility representations (2.5D-BR) where
vertices are mapped to 3D boxes having the bottom face in the plane and
edges are unobstructed lines of sight parallel to the - or -axis. We
prove that: Every complete bipartite graph admits a 2.5D-BR; The
complete graph admits a 2.5D-BR if and only if ; Every
graph with pathwidth at most admits a 2.5D-BR, which can be computed in
linear time. We then turn our attention to 2.5D grid box representations
(2.5D-GBR) which are 2.5D-BRs such that the bottom face of every box is a unit
square at integer coordinates. We show that an -vertex graph that admits a
2.5D-GBR has at most edges and this bound is tight. Finally,
we prove that deciding whether a given graph admits a 2.5D-GBR with a given
footprint is NP-complete. The footprint of a 2.5D-BR is the set of
bottom faces of the boxes in .Comment: Appears in the Proceedings of the 24th International Symposium on
Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2016
De/construction sites: Romans and the digital playground
The Roman world as attested to archaeologically and as interacted with today has its expression in a great many computational and other media. The place of visualisation within this has been paramount. This paper argues that the process of digitally constructing the Roman world and the exploration of the resultant models are useful methods for interpretation and influential factors in the creation of a popular Roman aesthetic. Furthermore, it suggests ways in which novel computational techniques enable the systematic deconstruction of such models, in turn re-purposing the many extant representations of Roman architecture and material culture
Straightening out planar poly-line drawings
We show that any -monotone poly-line drawing can be straightened out while
maintaining -coordinates and height. The width may increase much, but we
also show that on some graphs exponential width is required if we do not want
to increase the height. Likewise -monotonicity is required: there are
poly-line drawings (not -monotone) that cannot be straightened out while
maintaining the height. We give some applications of our result.Comment: The main result turns out to be known (Pach & Toth, J. Graph Theory
2004, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgt.10168/pdf
- …