55 research outputs found

    A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis

    Full text link
    Deep learning algorithms, in particular convolutional networks, have rapidly become a methodology of choice for analyzing medical images. This paper reviews the major deep learning concepts pertinent to medical image analysis and summarizes over 300 contributions to the field, most of which appeared in the last year. We survey the use of deep learning for image classification, object detection, segmentation, registration, and other tasks and provide concise overviews of studies per application area. Open challenges and directions for future research are discussed.Comment: Revised survey includes expanded discussion section and reworked introductory section on common deep architectures. Added missed papers from before Feb 1st 201

    DEEP LEARNING FOR VOLUMETRIC MEDICAL IMAGE SEGMENTATION

    Get PDF
    Over the past few decades, medical imaging techniques, e.g., computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), have been widely used to improve the state of diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of diseases. However, reading medical images and making diagnosis or treatment planning require well-trained medical specialists, which is labor-intensive, time-consuming, high-cost and error-prone. With the emerging of deep learning, doctors and researchers have started to benefit from medical image analysis in various applications, e.g., medical image registration, classification, detection and segmentation. Among these tasks, segmentation is the most common area of applying deep learning to medical imaging. How to improve medical diagnosis by advancing the segmentation in computer-aided diagnosis systems has become an active research topic. In this dissertation, we will address this topic in following aspects. (i) We propose a 3D-based coarse-to-fine framework to effectively and efficiently tackle the challenges of limited amount of annotated 3D data and limited computational resources in the field of volumetric medical image segmentation. (ii) We extend the 3D coarse-to-fine to be multi-scale to early detect the small but clinically important pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) tumors, and provide radiologists with interpretable abnormality locations by segmentation-for-classification. (iii) We extend the segmentation-for-classification to screen pancreatic neuroendocrine (PNETs) tumors by incorporating dual-phase information and dilated pancreatic duct that is regarded as the sign of high risk for pancreatic cancer. (iv) Going further, we investigate the mainstream methodology in the segmentation area and then explore the novel idea of AutoML in the medical imaging field to automatically search the neural network architectures tailoring for the segmentation task, which further advances the medical image segmentation field. (v) Moving forward beyond pancreatic tumors, we are the first to address the clinically critical task of detecting, identifying and characterizing suspicious cancer metastasized lymph nodes (LNs) by proposing a 3D distance stratification strategy to simulate and simplify the high-level reasoning protocols conducted by radiation oncologists in a divide-and-conquer manner. (vi) The 3D distance stratification strategy is upgraded by our proposed multi-branch detection-by-segmentation, which further advances the finding, identifying and segmenting of metastasis-suspicious LNs

    Localisation in 3D Images Using Cross-features Correlation Learning

    Get PDF
    Object detection and segmentation have evolved drastically over the past two decades thanks to the continuous advancement in the field of deep learning. Substantial research efforts have been dedicated towards integrating object detection techniques into a wide range of real-world prob-lems. Most existing methods take advantage of the successful application and representational ability of convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Generally, these methods target mainstream applications that are typically based on 2D imaging scenarios. Additionally, driven by the strong correlation between the quality of the feature embedding and the performance in CNNs, most works focus on design characteristics of CNNs, e.g., depth and width, to enhance their modelling capacity and discriminative ability. Limited research was directed towards exploiting feature-level dependencies, which can be feasibly used to enhance the performance of CNNs. More-over, directly adopting such approaches into more complex imaging domains that target data of higher dimensions (e.g., 3D multi-modal and volumetric images) is not straightforwardly appli-cable due to the different nature and complexity of the problem. In this thesis, we explore the possibility of incorporating feature-level correspondence and correlations into object detection and segmentation contexts that target the localisation of 3D objects from 3D multi-modal and volumetric image data. Accordingly, we first explore the detection problem of 3D solar active regions in multi-spectral solar imagery where different imaging bands correspond to different 2D layers (altitudes) in the 3D solar atmosphere.We propose a joint analysis approach in which information from different imaging bands is first individually analysed using band-specific network branches to extract inter-band features that are then dynamically cross-integrated and jointly analysed to investigate spatial correspon-dence and co-dependencies between the different bands. The aggregated embeddings are further analysed using band-specific detection network branches to predict separate sets of results (one for each band). Throughout our study, we evaluate different types of feature fusion, using convo-lutional embeddings of different semantic levels, as well as the impact of using different numbers of image bands inputs to perform the joint analysis. We test the proposed approach over different multi-modal datasets (multi-modal solar images and brain MRI) and applications. The proposed joint analysis based framework consistently improves the CNN’s performance when detecting target regions in contrast to single band based baseline methods.We then generalise our cross-band joint analysis detection scheme into the 3D segmentation problem using multi-modal images. We adopt the joint analysis principles into a segmentation framework where cross-band information is dynamically analysed and cross-integrated at vari-ous semantic levels. The proposed segmentation network also takes advantage of band-specific skip connections to maximise the inter-band information and assist the network in capturing fine details using embeddings of different spatial scales. Furthermore, a recursive training strat-egy, based on weak labels (e.g., bounding boxes), is proposed to overcome the difficulty of producing dense labels to train the segmentation network. We evaluate the proposed segmen-tation approach using different feature fusion approaches, over different datasets (multi-modal solar images, brain MRI, and cloud satellite imagery), and using different levels of supervisions. Promising results were achieved and demonstrate an improved performance in contrast to single band based analysis and state-of-the-art segmentation methods.Additionally, we investigate the possibility of explicitly modelling objective driven feature-level correlations, in a localised manner, within 3D medical imaging scenarios (3D CT pul-monary imaging) to enhance the effectiveness of the feature extraction process in CNNs and subsequently the detection performance. Particularly, we present a framework to perform the 3D detection of pulmonary nodules as an ensemble of two stages, candidate proposal and a false positive reduction. We propose a 3D channel attention block in which cross-channel informa-tion is incorporated to infer channel-wise feature importance with respect to the target objective. Unlike common attention approaches that rely on heavy dimensionality reduction and computa-tionally expensive multi-layer perceptron networks, the proposed approach utilises fully convo-lutional networks to allow directly exploiting rich 3D descriptors and performing the attention in an efficient manner. We also propose a fully convolutional 3D spatial attention approach that elevates cross-sectional information to infer spatial attention. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed attention approaches against a number of popular channel and spatial attention mechanisms. Furthermore, for the False positive reduction stage, in addition to attention, we adopt a joint analysis based approach that takes into account the variable nodule morphology by aggregating spatial information from different contextual levels. We also propose a Zoom-in convolutional path that incorporates semantic information of different spatial scales to assist the network in capturing fine details. The proposed detection approach demonstrates considerable gains in performance in contrast to state-of-the-art lung nodule detection methods.We further explore the possibility of incorporating long-range dependencies between arbi-trary positions in the input features using Transformer networks to infer self-attention, in the context of 3D pulmonary nodule detection, in contrast to localised (convolutional based) atten-tion . We present a hybrid 3D detection approach that takes advantage of both, the Transformers ability in modelling global context and correlations and the spatial representational characteris-tics of convolutional neural networks, providing complementary information and subsequently improving the discriminative ability of the detection model. We propose two hybrid Transformer CNN variants where we investigate the impact of exploiting a deeper Transformer design –in which more Transformer layers and trainable parameters are incorporated– is used along with high-level convolutional feature inputs of a single spatial resolution, in contrast to a shallower Transformer design –of less Transformer layers and trainable parameters– while exploiting con-volutional embeddings of different semantic levels and relatively higher resolution.Extensive quantitative and qualitative analyses are presented for the proposed methods in this thesis and demonstrate the feasibility of exploiting feature-level relations, either implicitly or explicitly, in different detection and segmentation problems

    The Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS)

    Get PDF
    In this work, we report the set-up and results of the Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS), which was organized in conjunction with the IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) 2017 and the International Conferences on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) 2017 and 2018. The image dataset is diverse and contains primary and secondary tumors with varied sizes and appearances with various lesion-to-background levels (hyper-/hypo-dense), created in collaboration with seven hospitals and research institutions. Seventy-five submitted liver and liver tumor segmentation algorithms were trained on a set of 131 computed tomography (CT) volumes and were tested on 70 unseen test images acquired from different patients. We found that not a single algorithm performed best for both liver and liver tumors in the three events. The best liver segmentation algorithm achieved a Dice score of 0.963, whereas, for tumor segmentation, the best algorithms achieved Dices scores of 0.674 (ISBI 2017), 0.702 (MICCAI 2017), and 0.739 (MICCAI 2018). Retrospectively, we performed additional analysis on liver tumor detection and revealed that not all top-performing segmentation algorithms worked well for tumor detection. The best liver tumor detection method achieved a lesion-wise recall of 0.458 (ISBI 2017), 0.515 (MICCAI 2017), and 0.554 (MICCAI 2018), indicating the need for further research. LiTS remains an active benchmark and resource for research, e.g., contributing the liver-related segmentation tasks in http://medicaldecathlon.com/. In addition, both data and online evaluation are accessible via https://competitions.codalab.org/competitions/17094.Bjoern Menze is supported through the DFG funding (SFB 824, subproject B12) and a Helmut-Horten-Professorship for Biomedical Informatics by the Helmut-Horten-Foundation. Florian Kofler is Supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) through TUM International Graduate School of Science and Engineering (IGSSE), GSC 81. An Tang was supported by the Fonds de recherche du Québec en Santé and Fondation de l’association des radiologistes du Québec (FRQS- ARQ 34939 Clinical Research Scholarship – Junior 2 Salary Award). Hongwei Bran Li is supported by Forschungskredit (Grant NO. FK-21- 125) from University of Zurich.Peer ReviewedArticle signat per 109 autors/es: Patrick Bilic 1,a,b, Patrick Christ 1,a,b, Hongwei Bran Li 1,2,∗,b, Eugene Vorontsov 3,a,b, Avi Ben-Cohen 5,a, Georgios Kaissis 10,12,15,a, Adi Szeskin 18,a, Colin Jacobs 4,a, Gabriel Efrain Humpire Mamani 4,a, Gabriel Chartrand 26,a, Fabian Lohöfer 12,a, Julian Walter Holch 29,30,69,a, Wieland Sommer 32,a, Felix Hofmann 31,32,a, Alexandre Hostettler 36,a, Naama Lev-Cohain 38,a, Michal Drozdzal 34,a, Michal Marianne Amitai 35,a, Refael Vivanti 37,a, Jacob Sosna 38,a, Ivan Ezhov 1, Anjany Sekuboyina 1,2, Fernando Navarro 1,76,78, Florian Kofler 1,13,57,78, Johannes C. Paetzold 15,16, Suprosanna Shit 1, Xiaobin Hu 1, Jana Lipková 17, Markus Rempfler 1, Marie Piraud 57,1, Jan Kirschke 13, Benedikt Wiestler 13, Zhiheng Zhang 14, Christian Hülsemeyer 1, Marcel Beetz 1, Florian Ettlinger 1, Michela Antonelli 9, Woong Bae 73, Míriam Bellver 43, Lei Bi 61, Hao Chen 39, Grzegorz Chlebus 62,64, Erik B. Dam 72, Qi Dou 41, Chi-Wing Fu 41, Bogdan Georgescu 60, Xavier Giró-i-Nieto 45, Felix Gruen 28, Xu Han 77, Pheng-Ann Heng 41, Jürgen Hesser 48,49,50, Jan Hendrik Moltz 62, Christian Igel 72, Fabian Isensee 69,70, Paul Jäger 69,70, Fucang Jia 75, Krishna Chaitanya Kaluva 21, Mahendra Khened 21, Ildoo Kim 73, Jae-Hun Kim 53, Sungwoong Kim 73, Simon Kohl 69, Tomasz Konopczynski 49, Avinash Kori 21, Ganapathy Krishnamurthi 21, Fan Li 22, Hongchao Li 11, Junbo Li 8, Xiaomeng Li 40, John Lowengrub 66,67,68, Jun Ma 54, Klaus Maier-Hein 69,70,7, Kevis-Kokitsi Maninis 44, Hans Meine 62,65, Dorit Merhof 74, Akshay Pai 72, Mathias Perslev 72, Jens Petersen 69, Jordi Pont-Tuset 44, Jin Qi 56, Xiaojuan Qi 40, Oliver Rippel 74, Karsten Roth 47, Ignacio Sarasua 51,12, Andrea Schenk 62,63, Zengming Shen 59,60, Jordi Torres 46,43, Christian Wachinger 51,12,1, Chunliang Wang 42, Leon Weninger 74, Jianrong Wu 25, Daguang Xu 71, Xiaoping Yang 55, Simon Chun-Ho Yu 58, Yading Yuan 52, Miao Yue 20, Liping Zhang 58, Jorge Cardoso 9, Spyridon Bakas 19,23,24, Rickmer Braren 6,12,30,a, Volker Heinemann 33,a, Christopher Pal 3,a, An Tang 27,a, Samuel Kadoury 3,a, Luc Soler 36,a, Bram van Ginneken 4,a, Hayit Greenspan 5,a, Leo Joskowicz 18,a, Bjoern Menze 1,2,a // 1 Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Germany; 2 Department of Quantitative Biomedicine, University of Zurich, Switzerland; 3 Ecole Polytechnique de Montréal, Canada; 4 Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; 5 Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tel-Aviv University, Israel; 6 German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Germany; 7 Pattern Analysis and Learning Group, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; 8 Philips Research China, Philips China Innovation Campus, Shanghai, China; 9 School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK; 10 Institute for AI in Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Germany; 11 Department of Computer Science, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, China; 12 Institute for diagnostic and interventional radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Germany; 13 Institute for diagnostic and interventional neuroradiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar,Technical University of Munich, Germany; 14 Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, China; 15 Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; 16 Institute for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany; 17 Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, USA; 18 School of Computer Science and Engineering, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel; 19 Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA; 20 CGG Services (Singapore) Pte. Ltd., Singapore; 21 Medical Imaging and Reconstruction Lab, Department of Engineering Design, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, India; 22 Sensetime, Shanghai, China; 23 Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, USA; 24 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA; 25 Tencent Healthcare (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd, China; 26 The University of Montréal Hospital Research Centre (CRCHUM) Montréal, Québec, Canada; 27 Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Montréal, Canada; 28 Institute of Control Engineering, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Germany; 29 Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; 30 Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Munich, Germany; 31 Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany; 32 Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany; 33 Department of Hematology/Oncology & Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, LMU Klinikum Munich, Germany; 34 Polytechnique Montréal, Mila, QC, Canada; 35 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv university, Israel; 36 Department of Surgical Data Science, Institut de Recherche contre les Cancers de l’Appareil Digestif (IRCAD), France; 37 Rafael Advanced Defense System, Israel; 38 Department of Radiology, Hadassah University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; 39 Department of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, China; 40 Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, China; 41 Department of Computer Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; 42 Department of Biomedical Engineering and Health Systems, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden; 43 Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Barcelona, Spain; 44 Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zurich (ETHZ), Zurich, Switzerland; 45 Signal Theory and Communications Department, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, Catalonia, Spain; 46 Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, Catalonia, Spain; 47 University of Tuebingen, Germany; 48 Mannheim Institute for Intelligent Systems in Medicine, department of Medicine Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; 49 Interdisciplinary Center for Scientific Computing (IWR), Heidelberg University, Germany; 50 Central Institute for Computer Engineering (ZITI), Heidelberg University, Germany; 51 Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany; 52 Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY, USA; 53 Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, South Korea; 54 Department of Mathematics, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, China; 55 Department of Mathematics, Nanjing University, China; 56 School of Information and Communication Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, China; 57 Helmholtz AI, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany; 58 Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; 59 Beckman Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA; 60 Siemens Healthineers, USA; 61 School of Computer Science, the University of Sydney, Australia; 62 Fraunhofer MEVIS, Bremen, Germany; 63 Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; 64 Diagnostic Image Analysis Group, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; 65 Medical Image Computing Group, FB3, University of Bremen, Germany; 66 Departments of Mathematics, Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, USA; 67 Center for Complex Biological Systems, University of California, Irvine, USA; 68 Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Irvine, USA; 69 Division of Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; 70 Helmholtz Imaging, Germany; 71 NVIDIA, Santa Clara, CA, USA; 72 Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; 73 Kakao Brain, Republic of Korea; 74 Institute of Imaging & Computer Vision, RWTH Aachen University, Germany; 75 Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China; 76 Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Germany; 77 Department of computer science, UNC Chapel Hill, USA; 78 TranslaTUM - Central Institute for Translational Cancer Research, Technical University of Munich, GermanyPostprint (published version

    The Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS)

    Full text link
    In this work, we report the set-up and results of the Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS), which was organized in conjunction with the IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) 2017 and the International Conferences on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) 2017 and 2018. The image dataset is diverse and contains primary and secondary tumors with varied sizes and appearances with various lesion-to-background levels (hyper-/hypo-dense), created in collaboration with seven hospitals and research institutions. Seventy-five submitted liver and liver tumor segmentation algorithms were trained on a set of 131 computed tomography (CT) volumes and were tested on 70 unseen test images acquired from different patients. We found that not a single algorithm performed best for both liver and liver tumors in the three events. The best liver segmentation algorithm achieved a Dice score of 0.963, whereas, for tumor segmentation, the best algorithms achieved Dices scores of 0.674 (ISBI 2017), 0.702 (MICCAI 2017), and 0.739 (MICCAI 2018). Retrospectively, we performed additional analysis on liver tumor detection and revealed that not all top-performing segmentation algorithms worked well for tumor detection. The best liver tumor detection method achieved a lesion-wise recall of 0.458 (ISBI 2017), 0.515 (MICCAI 2017), and 0.554 (MICCAI 2018), indicating the need for further research. LiTS remains an active benchmark and resource for research, e.g., contributing the liver-related segmentation tasks in http://medicaldecathlon.com/. In addition, both data and online evaluation are accessible via https://competitions.codalab.org/competitions/17094

    Human treelike tubular structure segmentation: A comprehensive review and future perspectives

    Get PDF
    Various structures in human physiology follow a treelike morphology, which often expresses complexity at very fine scales. Examples of such structures are intrathoracic airways, retinal blood vessels, and hepatic blood vessels. Large collections of 2D and 3D images have been made available by medical imaging modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and ultrasound in which the spatial arrangement can be observed. Segmentation of these structures in medical imaging is of great importance since the analysis of the structure provides insights into disease diagnosis, treatment planning, and prognosis. Manually labelling extensive data by radiologists is often time-consuming and error-prone. As a result, automated or semi-automated computational models have become a popular research field of medical imaging in the past two decades, and many have been developed to date. In this survey, we aim to provide a comprehensive review of currently publicly available datasets, segmentation algorithms, and evaluation metrics. In addition, current challenges and future research directions are discussed
    corecore