8,958 research outputs found
(Non-)existence of Polynomial Kernels for the Test Cover Problem
The input of the Test Cover problem consists of a set of vertices, and a
collection of distinct subsets of , called
tests. A test separates a pair of vertices if A subcollection is a test cover if each
pair of distinct vertices is separated by a test in . The
objective is to find a test cover of minimum cardinality, if one exists. This
problem is NP-hard.
We consider two parameterizations the Test Cover problem with parameter :
(a) decide whether there is a test cover with at most tests, (b) decide
whether there is a test cover with at most tests. Both
parameterizations are known to be fixed-parameter tractable. We prove that none
have a polynomial size kernel unless . Our proofs use
the cross-composition method recently introduced by Bodlaender et al. (2011)
and parametric duality introduced by Chen et al. (2005). The result for the
parameterization (a) was an open problem (private communications with Henning
Fernau and Jiong Guo, Jan.-Feb. 2012). We also show that the parameterization
(a) admits a polynomial size kernel if the size of each test is upper-bounded
by a constant
Data Reduction for Graph Coloring Problems
This paper studies the kernelization complexity of graph coloring problems
with respect to certain structural parameterizations of the input instances. We
are interested in how well polynomial-time data reduction can provably shrink
instances of coloring problems, in terms of the chosen parameter. It is well
known that deciding 3-colorability is already NP-complete, hence parameterizing
by the requested number of colors is not fruitful. Instead, we pick up on a
research thread initiated by Cai (DAM, 2003) who studied coloring problems
parameterized by the modification distance of the input graph to a graph class
on which coloring is polynomial-time solvable; for example parameterizing by
the number k of vertex-deletions needed to make the graph chordal. We obtain
various upper and lower bounds for kernels of such parameterizations of
q-Coloring, complementing Cai's study of the time complexity with respect to
these parameters.
Our results show that the existence of polynomial kernels for q-Coloring
parameterized by the vertex-deletion distance to a graph class F is strongly
related to the existence of a function f(q) which bounds the number of vertices
which are needed to preserve the NO-answer to an instance of q-List-Coloring on
F.Comment: Author-accepted manuscript of the article that will appear in the FCT
2011 special issue of Information & Computatio
Meta-Kernelization using Well-Structured Modulators
Kernelization investigates exact preprocessing algorithms with performance
guarantees. The most prevalent type of parameters used in kernelization is the
solution size for optimization problems; however, also structural parameters
have been successfully used to obtain polynomial kernels for a wide range of
problems. Many of these parameters can be defined as the size of a smallest
modulator of the given graph into a fixed graph class (i.e., a set of vertices
whose deletion puts the graph into the graph class). Such parameters admit the
construction of polynomial kernels even when the solution size is large or not
applicable. This work follows up on the research on meta-kernelization
frameworks in terms of structural parameters.
We develop a class of parameters which are based on a more general view on
modulators: instead of size, the parameters employ a combination of rank-width
and split decompositions to measure structure inside the modulator. This allows
us to lift kernelization results from modulator-size to more general
parameters, hence providing smaller kernels. We show (i) how such large but
well-structured modulators can be efficiently approximated, (ii) how they can
be used to obtain polynomial kernels for any graph problem expressible in
Monadic Second Order logic, and (iii) how they allow the extension of previous
results in the area of structural meta-kernelization
On the (non-)existence of polynomial kernels for Pl-free edge modification problems
Given a graph G = (V,E) and an integer k, an edge modification problem for a
graph property P consists in deciding whether there exists a set of edges F of
size at most k such that the graph H = (V,E \vartriangle F) satisfies the
property P. In the P edge-completion problem, the set F of edges is constrained
to be disjoint from E; in the P edge-deletion problem, F is a subset of E; no
constraint is imposed on F in the P edge-edition problem. A number of
optimization problems can be expressed in terms of graph modification problems
which have been extensively studied in the context of parameterized complexity.
When parameterized by the size k of the edge set F, it has been proved that if
P is an hereditary property characterized by a finite set of forbidden induced
subgraphs, then the three P edge-modification problems are FPT. It was then
natural to ask whether these problems also admit a polynomial size kernel.
Using recent lower bound techniques, Kratsch and Wahlstrom answered this
question negatively. However, the problem remains open on many natural graph
classes characterized by forbidden induced subgraphs. Kratsch and Wahlstrom
asked whether the result holds when the forbidden subgraphs are paths or cycles
and pointed out that the problem is already open in the case of P4-free graphs
(i.e. cographs). This paper provides positive and negative results in that line
of research. We prove that parameterized cograph edge modification problems
have cubic vertex kernels whereas polynomial kernels are unlikely to exist for
the Pl-free and Cl-free edge-deletion problems for large enough l
Cross-Composition: A New Technique for Kernelization Lower Bounds
We introduce a new technique for proving kernelization lower bounds, called
cross-composition. A classical problem L cross-composes into a parameterized
problem Q if an instance of Q with polynomially bounded parameter value can
express the logical OR of a sequence of instances of L. Building on work by
Bodlaender et al. (ICALP 2008) and using a result by Fortnow and Santhanam
(STOC 2008) we show that if an NP-complete problem cross-composes into a
parameterized problem Q then Q does not admit a polynomial kernel unless the
polynomial hierarchy collapses. Our technique generalizes and strengthens the
recent techniques of using OR-composition algorithms and of transferring the
lower bounds via polynomial parameter transformations. We show its
applicability by proving kernelization lower bounds for a number of important
graphs problems with structural (non-standard) parameterizations, e.g.,
Chromatic Number, Clique, and Weighted Feedback Vertex Set do not admit
polynomial kernels with respect to the vertex cover number of the input graphs
unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses, contrasting the fact that these
problems are trivially fixed-parameter tractable for this parameter. We have
similar lower bounds for Feedback Vertex Set.Comment: Updated information based on final version submitted to STACS 201
Kernelization Lower Bounds By Cross-Composition
We introduce the cross-composition framework for proving kernelization lower
bounds. A classical problem L AND/OR-cross-composes into a parameterized
problem Q if it is possible to efficiently construct an instance of Q with
polynomially bounded parameter value that expresses the logical AND or OR of a
sequence of instances of L. Building on work by Bodlaender et al. (ICALP 2008)
and using a result by Fortnow and Santhanam (STOC 2008) with a refinement by
Dell and van Melkebeek (STOC 2010), we show that if an NP-hard problem
OR-cross-composes into a parameterized problem Q then Q does not admit a
polynomial kernel unless NP \subseteq coNP/poly and the polynomial hierarchy
collapses. Similarly, an AND-cross-composition for Q rules out polynomial
kernels for Q under Bodlaender et al.'s AND-distillation conjecture.
Our technique generalizes and strengthens the recent techniques of using
composition algorithms and of transferring the lower bounds via polynomial
parameter transformations. We show its applicability by proving kernelization
lower bounds for a number of important graphs problems with structural
(non-standard) parameterizations, e.g., Clique, Chromatic Number, Weighted
Feedback Vertex Set, and Weighted Odd Cycle Transversal do not admit polynomial
kernels with respect to the vertex cover number of the input graphs unless the
polynomial hierarchy collapses, contrasting the fact that these problems are
trivially fixed-parameter tractable for this parameter.
After learning of our results, several teams of authors have successfully
applied the cross-composition framework to different parameterized problems.
For completeness, our presentation of the framework includes several extensions
based on this follow-up work. For example, we show how a relaxed version of
OR-cross-compositions may be used to give lower bounds on the degree of the
polynomial in the kernel size.Comment: A preliminary version appeared in the proceedings of the 28th
International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS
2011) under the title "Cross-Composition: A New Technique for Kernelization
Lower Bounds". Several results have been strengthened compared to the
preliminary version (http://arxiv.org/abs/1011.4224). 29 pages, 2 figure
Vertex Cover Kernelization Revisited: Upper and Lower Bounds for a Refined Parameter
An important result in the study of polynomial-time preprocessing shows that
there is an algorithm which given an instance (G,k) of Vertex Cover outputs an
equivalent instance (G',k') in polynomial time with the guarantee that G' has
at most 2k' vertices (and thus O((k')^2) edges) with k' <= k. Using the
terminology of parameterized complexity we say that k-Vertex Cover has a kernel
with 2k vertices. There is complexity-theoretic evidence that both 2k vertices
and Theta(k^2) edges are optimal for the kernel size. In this paper we consider
the Vertex Cover problem with a different parameter, the size fvs(G) of a
minimum feedback vertex set for G. This refined parameter is structurally
smaller than the parameter k associated to the vertex covering number vc(G)
since fvs(G) <= vc(G) and the difference can be arbitrarily large. We give a
kernel for Vertex Cover with a number of vertices that is cubic in fvs(G): an
instance (G,X,k) of Vertex Cover, where X is a feedback vertex set for G, can
be transformed in polynomial time into an equivalent instance (G',X',k') such
that |V(G')| <= 2k and |V(G')| <= O(|X'|^3). A similar result holds when the
feedback vertex set X is not given along with the input. In sharp contrast we
show that the Weighted Vertex Cover problem does not have a polynomial kernel
when parameterized by the cardinality of a given vertex cover of the graph
unless NP is in coNP/poly and the polynomial hierarchy collapses to the third
level.Comment: Published in "Theory of Computing Systems" as an Open Access
publicatio
- …