46,275 research outputs found
Pain in photodynamic therapy
Photodynamic therapy is a modern treatment with applications in several medical specialties, which has been intensely studied in the last years. The main indications in dermatology are actinic keratosis, superficial basal cell carcinoma and Bowen\u27s disease- common skin disorders in which photodynamic therapy proved its efficacy. At present, the use of photodynamic therapy for the treatment of other skin disorders is profoundly researched. Pain is the most common and redoubtable adverse effect of photodynamic therapy and it is the most important factor affecting the patient\u27s adherence to treatment. The aim of this article is to look over the most recent medical studies regarding pain in PDT, with emphasis on the factors affecting the occurrence of pain and the most recent strategies for controlling photodynamic therapy- related pain
The antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in the treatment of peri-implantitis
The aim of this study is to demonstrate the effectiveness of addition of the antimicrobial photodynamic therapy to
the conventional approach in the treatment of peri-implantitis. Materials and Methods. Forty patients were randomly assigned
to test or control groups. Patients were assessed at baseline and at six (T1), twelve (T2), and twenty-four (T3) weeks recording
plaque index (PlI), probing pocket depth (PPD), and bleeding on probing (BOP); control group received conventional periodontal
therapy, while test group received photodynamic therapy in addition to it. Result. Test group showed a 70% reduction in the plaque
index values and a 60% reduction in PD values compared to the baseline. BOP and suppuration were not detectable. Control
group showed a significative reduction in plaque index and PD. Discussion. Laser therapy has some advantages in comparison to
traditional therapy, with faster and greater healing of the wound. Conclusion. Test group showed after 24 weeks a better value in
terms of PPD, BOP, and PlI, with an average pocket depth value of 2 mm, if compared with control group (3 mm).Our results suggest
that antimicrobial photodynamic therapy with diode laser and phenothiazine chloride represents a reliable adjunctive treatment
to conventional therapy. Photodynamic therapy should, however, be considered a coadjuvant in the treatment of peri-implantitis
associated with mechanical (scaling) and surgical (grafts) treatments
Pulsed Dye Laser-mediated Photodynamic Therapy is Less Effective than Conventional Photodynamic Therapy for Actinic Field Cancerization : A Randomized Half-side Comparative Study
Previous research presents pulsed dye laser-mediated photodynamic therapy as a promising alternative to conventional red-light photodynamic therapy. In this study, 60 patients with 2 or more actinic keratoses randomly received either of these treatments on each side of the head. A physician blinded to the treatment evaluated treatment response at 6 months for each lesion, as completely, partially or not healed. Significantly lower complete clearance rates (10.3% vs 44.9%) and lesion-specific complete clearance rates were found for pulsed dye laser-mediated photodynamic therapy (47.9%) vs conventional red-light photodynamic therapy (73.4%). Significantly lower pain scores were found for pulsed dye laser-mediated photodynamic therapy, with a mean numerical rating of 2.3, compared with 4.1 for conventional red-light photodynamic therapy. The study population had a mean of 7.9 lesions, and 78% of patients had been treated previously for actinic keratoses on the treatment area. To conclude, in a population with severe sun damage, pulsed dye laser-mediated photodynamic therapy seems less effective than conventional red-light photodynamic therapy. Pulsed dye laser-mediated photodynamic therapy may still be a treatment option for patients who are not compliant with conventional red-light photodynamic therapy.Peer reviewe
Photodynamic therapy for chronic venous ulcers
Some laboratory findings and a few case reports support the treatment of chronic venous ulcers with photodynamic therapy. We treated 19 patients with refractory chronic venous ulcers using photodynamic therapy. The ulcers healed in 15 cases (78.9%) after an average of 6.8 photodynamic therapy sessions (range 6.0-8.0). In the remaining 4 cases, the ulcers showed marked improvement after 10 photodynamic therapy sessions. Photodynamic therapy seems to represent a good alternative therapeutic choice for refractory chronic venous ulcers.</p
Photodynamic therapy as a new therapeutic approach of oral lichen planus
Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a chronic, immunologically mediated disease, defined by periods of exacerbation and quiescence. The disease is associated with a low mortality risk, but in some instances, morbidity can be important, especially in extensive, erosive forms, with a significant impact on the quality of life. OLP is a chronic T-cell mediated inflammatory disease involving the oral cavity, the most common lesions being located on the oral mucosa, tongue and gums. Its etiology remains in part unknown, but several factors proved to be involved in the development of the disease (drugs, dental materials, infectious agents, psychological factors, autoimmunity and genetic predisposition). The therapeutic approach should take into account the type of lesion and the extent of the disease, as well as the possible adverse effects. Although several therapies are available, OLP treatment still remains a challenge. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is widely used in dermatology, finding applicability in the treatment of an increasing number of conditions. Recent research has shown the role of PDT in the treatment of OLP. It is a minimally invasive therapy with few side effects and promising results
Does Photodynamic Therapy Improve The Survival Rate Of Patients With Unresectable Cholangiocarcinoma?
Objective: The objective of this selective EBM review is to determine whether or not photodynamic therapy improves the survival rate of patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma.
Study Design: Systematic review of two randomized controlled trials and one retrospective cohort study published in 2014, 2014, and 2016.
Data Sources: Two randomized controlled trials and one retrospective cohort study examining photodynamic therapy in patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma.
Data sources were found using PubMed and EBSCOhost.
Outcome(s) Measured: Overall survival and progression free survival were measured in patients who underwent photodynamic therapy for unresectable cholangiocarcinoma. Each study analyzed overall survival using a Kaplan-Meier survival curve.
Results: The RCT by Hauge et al. found photodynamic therapy to improve overall survival rate in patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma compared to patients who did not receive photodynamic therapy. The RCT by Park et al. found photodynamic therapy plus oral flouropyrimidine to improve overall survival over photodynamic therapy alone. The retrospective cohort study by Strand et al. was found to show no significant difference in overall survival with patients who underwent ERCP-directed radiofrequency ablation versus ERCP-directed photodynamic therapy.
Conclusions: There is conflicting evidence as to whether photodynamic therapy improves the survival rate of patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma. Furthe
Modulation of 5-Aminolevulinic acid mediated photodynamic therapy induced cell death in a human lung adenocarcinoma cell line
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a cancer treatment involving the administration of a photosensitising drug which selectively accumulates in tumor tissue, followed by irradiation with appropriate wavelength light. It triggers photochemical reactions inducing reactive oxygen species (ROS) production with the consequent cellular damage, which ultimately leads to cell death. Porphyrins are the only photosensitizers (PSs) endogenously synthesized by means of administration of the biological precursor, 5- aminolevulinic acid (ALA). Several antioxidants and ROS scavenger agents: reduced glutathione (GSH), mannitol (Man), l-tryptophan (Trp), ascorbate (Asc) and trolox (Trx), were assayed to determine their ability to modulate ALA-based PDT (ALA-PDT); it was performed on A549 human lung adenocarcinoma cells, by incubating with 1mM ALA for 3 hr and followed by irradiation with or without 1 hr pre-incubation with the modulators. They were previously tested for possible cytotoxicity/ photoactivity in concentrations ranging from 0.01 to 20 mM. The ratio between cell survival after ALA-PDT in the presence and in the absence of the scavenger agent (protection grade: PG) was determined, and the concentration showing no cytotoxicity/ photoactivity and providing the highest PG was used in the subsequent experiments. ALA-PDT alone induced a high percentage of apoptotic cell death (98.4 ± 3.5%) as revealed by acridine orange/ethidium bromide staining and AnnexinV-FITC/propidium iodide labelling. Pre-incubation with the modulators at their highest PG concentration significantly reduced apoptotic cells to 48.3 ± 2.7% (Asc), 58.8 ± 4.2 (Trx), 78.5 ± 3.1% (GSH), 64.3 ± 1.6% (Man), 74.6 ± 2.3% (Trp). ROS involvement in early cell death induction after ALA-PDT was tested by flow cytometry using the fluorescent probes dihydro-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (H2-DCFDA) and methoxyvinylpyrene (MVP) for detection of peroxides and singlet oxygen, respectively. ROS production increased after ALA-PDT (H2-DCFDA positive cells, control: 1.1 ± 0.1 %; 10 min-PDT: 69.3 ± 5.6%; MVP positive cells, control: 0.65 ± 0.35%; 10 min-PDT: 83.5 ± 1.9%). Asc prevented peroxide formation (H2-DCFDA positive cells: 50.7 ± 2.8%) and mostly prevented singlet oxygen increase (MVP positive cells: 25.4 ± 5.2%) whereas Trx limited peroxides formation (H2-DCFDA positive cells: 20.8 ± 0.5%), but did not significantly affected singlet oxygen production (MVP positive cells: 73.6 ± 3.4%). Selective scavenger mediated protection against PDT-induced cell death, and direct detection of specific pro-oxidative agents, entail the strong involvement of ROS in ALA-PDT-mediated tumor eradication, suggesting that undesired photodamage to normal tissue might be attenuated by administration of antioxidant agents.Fil: Teijo, Maria Julieta. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientĂficas y TĂ©cnicas. Oficina de CoordinaciĂłn Administrativa Houssay. Centro de Investigaciones sobre Porfirinas y Porfirias. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigaciones sobre Porfirinas y Porfirias; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de QuĂmica BiolĂłgica; ArgentinaFil: Diez, Berenice Andrea. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientĂficas y TĂ©cnicas. Oficina de CoordinaciĂłn Administrativa Houssay. Centro de Investigaciones sobre Porfirinas y Porfirias. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigaciones sobre Porfirinas y Porfirias; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de QuĂmica BiolĂłgica; ArgentinaFil: Battle, A.. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientĂficas y TĂ©cnicas. Oficina de CoordinaciĂłn Administrativa Houssay. Centro de Investigaciones sobre Porfirinas y Porfirias. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigaciones sobre Porfirinas y Porfirias; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Hospital de ClĂnicas General San MartĂn; ArgentinaFil: Fukuda, Haydee. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientĂficas y TĂ©cnicas. Oficina de CoordinaciĂłn Administrativa Houssay. Centro de Investigaciones sobre Porfirinas y Porfirias. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigaciones sobre Porfirinas y Porfirias; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de QuĂmica BiolĂłgica; Argentin
Photodynamische Therapie (PDT) und wassergefiltertes Infrarot A (wIRA) bei Patienten mit therapierefraktĂ€ren vulgĂ€ren Hand- und FuĂwarzen
Background: Common warts (verrucae vulgares) are human papilloma virus (HPV) infections with a high incidence and prevalence, most often affecting hands and feet, being able to impair quality of life. About 30 different therapeutic regimens described in literature reveal a lack of a single striking strategy. Recent publications showed positive results of photodynamic therapy (PDT) with 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) in the treatment of HPV-induced skin diseases, especially warts, using visible light (VIS) to stimulate an absorption band of endogenously formed protoporphyrin IX. Additional experiences adding waterfiltered infrared A (wIRA) during 5-ALA-PDT revealed positive effects. Aim of the study: First prospective randomised controlled blind study including PDT and wIRA in the treatment of recalcitrant common hand and foot warts. Comparison of "5-ALA cream (ALA) vs. placebo cream (PLC)" and "irradiation with visible light and wIRA (VIS+wIRA) vs. irradiation with visible light alone (VIS)". Methods: Pre-treatment with keratolysis (salicylic acid) and curettage. PDT treatment: topical application of 5-ALA (Medac) in "unguentum emulsificans aquosum" vs. placebo; irradiation: combination of VIS and a large amount of wIRA (HydrosunÂź radiator type 501, 4 mm water cuvette, waterfiltered spectrum 590-1400 nm, contact-free, typically painless) vs. VIS alone. Post-treatment with retinoic acid ointment. One to three therapy cycles every 3 weeks. Main variable of interest: "Percent change of total wart area of each patient over the time" (18 weeks). Global judgement by patient and by physician and subjective rating of feeling/pain (visual analogue scales). 80 patients with therapy-resistant common hand and foot warts were assigned randomly into one of the four therapy groups with comparable numbers of warts at comparable sites in all groups. Results: The individual total wart area decreased during 18 weeks in group 1 (ALA+VIS+wIRA) and in group 2 (PLC+VIS+wIRA) significantly more than in both groups without wIRA (group 3 (ALA+VIS) and 4 (PLC+VIS)): medians and interquartile ranges: -94% (-100%/-84%) vs. -99% (-100%/-71%) vs. -47% (-75%/0%) vs. -73% (-92%/-27%). After 18 weeks the two groups with wIRA differed remarkably from the two groups without wIRA: 42% vs. 7% completely cured patients; 72% vs. 34% vanished warts. Global judgement by patient and by physician and subjective rating of feeling was much better in the two groups with wIRA than in the two groups without wIRA. Conclusions: The above described complete treatment scheme of hand and foot warts (keratolysis, curettage, PDT treatment, irradiation with VIS+wIRA, retinoic acid ointment; three therapy cycles every 3 weeks) proved to be effective. Within this treatment scheme wIRA as non-invasive and painless treatment modality revealed to be an important, effective factor, while photodynamic therapy with 5-ALA in the described form did not contribute recognisably - neither alone (without wIRA) nor in combination with wIRA - to a clinical improvement. For future treatment of warts an even improved scheme is proposed: one treatment cycle (keratolysis, curettage, wIRA, without PDT) once a week for six to nine weeks. © 2004 Fuchs et al; licensee German Medical Science. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL : http://www.egms.de/en/gms/volume2.shtmlHintergrund: VulgĂ€re Warzen (Verrucae vulgares) sind humane Papillomvirus-Infektionen (HPV) mit einer hohen Inzidenz und PrĂ€valenz, die am hĂ€ufigsten HĂ€nde und FĂŒĂe befallen und die in der Lage sind, die LebensqualitĂ€t zu beeintrĂ€chtigen. Etwa 30 in der Literatur beschriebene Therapieverfahren zeugen von einem Mangel an einer einzigen ĂŒberzeugenden Strategie. JĂŒngste Veröffentlichungen zeigten positive Ergebnisse der Photodynamischen Therapie (PDT) mit 5-AminolĂ€vulinsĂ€ure (5-ALA) in der Therapie von HPV-induzierten Hautkrankheiten, besonders Warzen, wobei sichtbares Licht (VIS) verwendet wird, um ein Absorptionsband des endogen aus 5-ALA gebildeten Protoporphyrin IX zu stimulieren. Weitere Erfahrungen, wassergefiltertes Infrarot A (wIRA) wĂ€hrend der 5-ALA-PDT zusĂ€tzlich anzuwenden, offenbarten positive Wirkungen. Ziel der Untersuchung: Erste prospektive randomisierte kontrollierte Blind-Studie, die PDT und wIRA in die Behandlung von therapierefraktĂ€ren vulgĂ€ren Hand- und FuĂwarzen einbezieht. Vergleich von "5-ALA-Salbe (ALA) vs. Placebo-Salbe (PLC)" und "Bestrahlung mit sichtbarem Licht und wIRA (VIS+wIRA) vs. Bestrahlung mit sichtbarem Licht allein (VIS)". Methoden: Vorbehandlung mit Keratolyse (SalizylsĂ€ure) und KĂŒrettage. Photodynamische Therapie (PDT): topische Applikation von 5-ALA (Medac) in "Unguentum emulsificans aquosum" vs. Placebo; Bestrahlung: Kombination von sichtbarem Licht (VIS) und einem hohen MaĂ an wassergefiltertem Infrarot A (wIRA) (HydrosunÂź-Strahler Typ 501, 4 mm WasserkĂŒvette, wassergefiltertes Spektrum 590-1400 nm, kontaktfrei, typischerweise schmerzlos) vs. sichtbares Licht (VIS) allein. Nachbehandlung mit Vitamin-A-SĂ€ure-Salbe. Ein bis drei Therapiezyklen im Abstand von 3 Wochen. Hauptzielvariable: "Prozentuale Ănderung der GesamtwarzenflĂ€che jedes Patienten ĂŒber die Zeit" (18 Wochen). Globales Urteil von Patient und von Arzt sowie subjektive EinschĂ€tzung von Empfindung/Schmerz (visuelle Analogskalen). 80 Patienten mit therapierefraktĂ€ren vulgĂ€ren Hand- und FuĂwarzen wurden randomisiert einer der vier Behandlungsgruppen (mit vergleichbarer Anzahl an Warzen in vergleichbaren Lokalisationen in allen Gruppen) zugeteilt. Ergebnisse: Die individuelle GesamtwarzenflĂ€che nahm wĂ€hrend 18 Wochen in Gruppe 1 (ALA+VIS+wIRA) und in Gruppe 2 (PLC+VIS+wIRA) signifikant mehr als in den beiden Gruppen ohne wIRA (Gruppe 3 (ALA+VIS) und 4 (PLC+VIS)) ab: Mediane und Interquartil-Spannen: -94% (-100%/-84%) vs. -99% (-100%/-71%) vs. -47% (-75%/0%) vs. -73% (-92%/-27%). Nach 18 Wochen unterschieden sich die zwei Gruppen mit wIRA deutlich von den zwei Gruppen ohne wIRA: 42% vs. 7% komplett geheilte Patienten; 72% vs. 34% völlig verschwundene Warzen. Das globale Urteil von Patient und von Arzt und die subjektive EinschĂ€tzung des Empfindens waren in den zwei Gruppen mit wIRA viel besser als in den zwei Gruppen ohne wIRA. Folgerungen: Das oben beschriebene vollstĂ€ndige Therapieschema von Hand- und FuĂwarzen (Keratolyse, KĂŒrettage, Photodynamische Therapie, Bestrahlung mit VIS+wIRA, Vitamin-A-SĂ€ure-Salbe; drei Therapiezyklen im Abstand von 3 Wochen) erwies sich als effektiv. Innerhalb des Therapieschemas zeigte sich wIRA - als nicht-invasive und schmerzlose TherapiemodalitĂ€t - als ein wichtiger, effektiver Faktor, wĂ€hrend die Photodynamische Therapie mit 5-ALA in der beschriebenen Form nicht erkennbar - weder alleine (ohne wIRA) noch in Kombination mit wIRA - zu einer klinischen Verbesserung beitrug. FĂŒr die zukĂŒnftige Behandlung von Warzen wird ein weiter verbessertes Schema vorgeschlagen: ein Therapiezyklus (Keratolyse, KĂŒrettage, wIRA, ohne PDT) einmal pro Woche fĂŒr sechs bis neun Wochen
Overview on topical 5-ALA photodynamic therapy use for non melanoma skin cancers
Ultraviolet radiation (UV) contributes to a variety of skin diseases including inflammation, degenerative aging, and cancer. Historically, humans have been exposed to UV radiation mainly through occupational exposure; recreational UV exposure, however, has increased dramatically in recent years, because of outdoor leisure activities and to purposely tan for cosmetic purposes. Both UVB and UVA radiation have been shown to cause DNA damage and immunosuppression, the important forms of biological damage that lead to NMSC. Nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is the most common malignancy, whose public health significance is often unrecognized which continues to grow at an alarming rate, becoming an occupational disease. Available treatments alternative to surgery include photodynamic therapy, electrochemotherapy, cryotherapy, ablative lasers, 5-fluorouracil, imiquimod, ingenol mebutate, and diclofenac. Among these, photodynamic therapy is a noninvasive technique with excellent cosmetic outcome and good curative results, when used in initial stages of skin cancers for superficial lesions. It is administered under numerous and significantly varied regimens and there are a wide range of cure rates reported, permitting treatment of large and multiple lesions with excellent cosmetic results. This is an overview of photodynamic applications especially for the treatment of NMSC, with a short focus on daylight modality. © 2014 Carmen Cantisani et al
- âŠ