2,242,127 research outputs found

    Untangling the Web: A Guide To Internet Research

    Get PDF
    [Excerpt] Untangling the Web for 2007 is the twelfth edition of a book that started as a small handout. After more than a decade of researching, reading about, using, and trying to understand the Internet, I have come to accept that it is indeed a Sisyphean task. Sometimes I feel that all I can do is to push the rock up to the top of that virtual hill, then stand back and watch as it rolls down again. The Internet—in all its glory of information and misinformation—is for all practical purposes limitless, which of course means we can never know it all, see it all, understand it all, or even imagine all it is and will be. The more we know about the Internet, the more acute is our awareness of what we do not know. The Internet emphasizes the depth of our ignorance because our knowledge can only be finite, while our ignorance must necessarily be infinite. My hope is that Untangling the Web will add to our knowledge of the Internet and the world while recognizing that the rock will always roll back down the hill at the end of the day

    National Security Space Launch

    Get PDF
    The United States Space Force’s National Security Space Launch (NSSL) program, formerly known as the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) program, was first established in 1994 by President William J. Clinton’s National Space Transportation Policy. The policy assigned the responsibility for expendable launch vehicles to the Department of Defense (DoD), with the goals of lowering launch costs and ensuring national security access to space. As such, the United States Air Force Space and Missile Systems Center (SMC) started the EELV program to acquire more affordable and reliable launch capability for valuable U.S. military satellites, such as national reconnaissance satellites that cost billions per satellite. In March 2019, the program name was changed from EELV to NSSL, which reflected several important features: 1.) The emphasis on “assured access to space,” 2.) transition from the Russian-made RD-180 rocket engine used on the Atlas V to a US-sourced engine (now scheduled to be complete by 2022), 3.) adaptation to manifest changes (such as enabling satellite swaps and return of manifest to normal operations both within 12 months of a need or an anomaly), and 4.) potential use of reusable launch vehicles. As of August 2019, Blue Origin, Northrop Grumman Innovation Systems, SpaceX, and United Launch Alliance (ULA) have all submitted proposals. From these, the U.S. Air Force will be selecting two companies to fulfill approximately 34 launches over a period of five years, beginning in 2022. This paper will therefore first examine the objectives for the NSSL as presented in the 2017 National Security Strategy, Fiscal Year 2019, Fiscal Year 2020, and Fiscal Year 2021 National Defense Authorization Acts (NDAA), and National Presidential Directive No. 40. The paper will then identify areas of potential weakness and gaps that exist in space launch programs as a whole and explore the security implications that impact the NSSL specifically. Finally, the paper will examine how the trajectory of the NSSL program could be adjusted in order to facilitate a smooth transition into new launch vehicles, while maintaining mission success, minimizing national security vulnerabilities, and clarifying the defense acquisition process.No embargoAcademic Major: EnglishAcademic Major: International Studie

    Russia's National Security Concept

    Full text link
    Dubois Patrick. KAHN (Zadoc). In: , . Le dictionnaire de pédagogie et d'instruction primaire de Ferdinand Buisson : répertoire biographique des auteurs. Paris : Institut national de recherche pédagogique, 2002. p. 90. (BibliothÚque de l'Histoire de l'Education, 17

    Teaching National Security Law

    Get PDF

    Russia's National Security Concept

    Full text link

    National Security Strategies, Emergent Powers and 'Sustaining Peace'

    Get PDF
    Textual analysis of national security strategy and defence white paper documents reveals different patterns of discursive investment in peace-related practices. Countries ranked “partly free”, and “not free” by Freedom House use more peace terminology than countries ranked “free”. Traditional UN peacekeeping has greater discursive investment from larger contributing countries. More recently developed UN peacebuilding practices have greater support from smaller Western European countries. Russia is not discursively invested in any UN-centred peace practice. There are regional clusters of similarity in security and defence documents, with geographical proximity having more of an effect than political similarity. Within substantive mentions of “peacebuilding”, there are Western/non-Western and Global North/Global South splits. There is a negative correlation between ODA (Official Development Assistance) status and public security/defence document production: the poorer a country is, the less likely it is to produce a document. Using Freedom House rankings, “free” counties are more likely to produce public security/defence documents than “partly free” and “not free” countries. The range of peace terminology in these documents is huge, with 249 different pairings of “peace” with others terms identified
    • 

    corecore