Frequency of the most abundant bacterial genera, indicated in % of all classified sequences, within each treatment of bio-organic fertilizer (BIO), cattle manure compost (CM), Chinese medicine residue compost (CMR), general operation control (GCK) and pig manure compost (PM).

<p>Only the genera frequency higher than 1% was listed in the table. Values are the means followed by standard error of the mean. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences at the 0.05 probability level according to Fisher's least significant difference test (LSD) and the Duncan test.</p

The relative abundance of the phyla for treatments with bio-organic fertilizer (BIO), cattle manure compost (CM), Chinese medicine residue compost (CMR), general operation control (GCK) and pig manure compost (PM).

<p>Bars represent the standard error of the three replicates and different letters above each phylum indicate significantly difference at 0.05 probability level according to the Duncan test.</p

Redundancy analysis (RDA) of the abundant phyla and soil properties for soil samples from treatments with bio-organic fertilizer (BIO), cattle manure compost (CM), Chinese medicine residue compost (CMR), general operation control (GCK) and pig manure compost (PM).

<p>Redundancy analysis (RDA) of the abundant phyla and soil properties for soil samples from treatments with bio-organic fertilizer (BIO), cattle manure compost (CM), Chinese medicine residue compost (CMR), general operation control (GCK) and pig manure compost (PM).</p

Frequency of the most abundant bacterial genera, indicated in % of all classified sequences, within each treatment of bio-organic fertilizer (BIO), cattle manure compost (CM), Chinese medicine residue compost (CMR), general operation control (GCK) and pig manure compost (PM).

<p>Only the genera frequency higher than 1% was listed in the table. Values are the means followed by standard error of the mean. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences at the 0.05 probability level according to Fisher's least significant difference test (LSD) and the Duncan test.</p

Rarefaction analysis at different 3% dissimilarity levels for treatments with bio-organic fertilizer (BIO), cattle manure compost (CM), Chinese medicine residue compost (CMR), general operation control (GCK) and pig manure compost (PM).

<p>Rarefaction analysis at different 3% dissimilarity levels for treatments with bio-organic fertilizer (BIO), cattle manure compost (CM), Chinese medicine residue compost (CMR), general operation control (GCK) and pig manure compost (PM).</p

Heat map of the bacterial communities based on abundance of phyla (a) and Jackknifed principal coordination analysis (PCoA) plots with unweighted UniFrac distance metric (b) from treatments with bio-organic fertilizer (BIO), cattle manure compost (CM), Chinese medicine residue compost (CMR), general operation control (GCK) and pig manure compost (PM).

<p>Color from pink to blue indicates increasing abundance.</p

Correlation analysis between the relative abundance of two bacteria phyla (a), three of the most classified bacteria genera (b) and banana <i>Fusarium</i> wilt disease incidence for treatments with bio-organic fertilizer (BIO), cattle manure compost (CM), Chinese medicine residue compost (CMR), general operation control (GCK) and pig manure compost (PM).

<p>Correlation analysis between the relative abundance of two bacteria phyla (a), three of the most classified bacteria genera (b) and banana <i>Fusarium</i> wilt disease incidence for treatments with bio-organic fertilizer (BIO), cattle manure compost (CM), Chinese medicine residue compost (CMR), general operation control (GCK) and pig manure compost (PM).</p

Hierarchical cluster tree constructed based on the distance matrix that was calculated using the (a) weighted UniFrac algorithm and (b) unweighted UniFrac algorithm for treatments with bio-organic fertilizer (BIO), cattle manure compost (CM), Chinese medicine residue compost (CMR), general operation control (GCK) and pig manure compost (PM).

<p>Hierarchical cluster tree constructed based on the distance matrix that was calculated using the (a) weighted UniFrac algorithm and (b) unweighted UniFrac algorithm for treatments with bio-organic fertilizer (BIO), cattle manure compost (CM), Chinese medicine residue compost (CMR), general operation control (GCK) and pig manure compost (PM).</p

Good quality sequences that were used to further analysis after basic quality control for treatments: bio-organic fertilizer (BIO), cattle manure compost (CM), Chinese medicine residue compost (CMR), general operation control (GCK) and pig manure compost (PM).

<p>Good quality sequences that were used to further analysis after basic quality control for treatments: bio-organic fertilizer (BIO), cattle manure compost (CM), Chinese medicine residue compost (CMR), general operation control (GCK) and pig manure compost (PM).</p

Calculations of Chao1, ACE, Shannon and Good's Coverage indices for treatments with bio-organic fertilizer (BIO), cattle manure compost (CM), Chinese medicine residue compost (CMR), general operation control (GCK) and pig manure compost (PM) at a 97% similarity threshold.

<p>Values indicate the means followed by standard error of the mean. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences at the 0.05 probability level according to Fisher's least significant difference test (LSD) and the Duncan test.</p