9 research outputs found
Li<sub>3</sub>Y(PS<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub> and Li<sub>5</sub>PS<sub>4</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub>: New Lithium Superionic Conductors Predicted from Silver Thiophosphates using Efficiently Tiered Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations
We
report two novel, earth-abundant lithium superionic conductors,
Li<sub>3</sub>Y(PS<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub> and Li<sub>5</sub>PS<sub>4</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub>, that are predicted to satisfy the necessary
combination of good phase stability, high Li<sup>+</sup> conductivity,
wide band gap and good electrochemical stability for solid electrolyte
applications in all-solid-state rechargeable lithium-ion batteries.
These candidates were identified from a high-throughput first-principles
screening of the Li–P–S ternary and Li–M–P–S
(where M is a non-redox-active element) quaternary chemical spaces,
including candidates obtained by replacing Ag with Li in the Ag–P–S
and Ag–M–P–S chemical spaces. An efficient tiered
screening strategy was developed that combines topological analysis
with <i>ab initio</i> molecular dynamics simulations to
exclude rapidly candidates unlikely to satisfy the stringent conductivity
requirements of lithium superionic conductors. In particular, we find
Li<sub>3</sub>Y(PS<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub> to be an extremely promising
candidate exhibiting a room-temperature Li<sup>+</sup> conductivity
of 2.16 mS/cm, which can be increased multifold to 7.14 and 5.25 mS/cm
via aliovalent doping with Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Zr<sup>4+</sup>, respectively.
More critically, we show that the phase and electrochemical stability
of Li<sub>3</sub>Y(PS<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub> is expected to be better
than current state-of-the-art lithium superionic conductors
Data-Driven First-Principles Methods for the Study and Design of Alkali Superionic Conductors
We
present a detailed exposition of how first-principles methods
can be used to guide alkali superionic conductor (ASIC) study and
design. Using the argyrodite Li<sub>6</sub>PS<sub>5</sub>Cl as a case
study, we demonstrate how modern information technology (IT) infrastructure
and software tools can facilitate the assessment of alkali superionic
conductors in terms of various critical properties of interest such
as phase and electrochemical stability and ionic conductivity. The
emphasis is on well-documented, reproducible analysis code that can
be readily generalized to other material systems and design problems.
For our chosen Li<sub>6</sub>PS<sub>5</sub>Cl case study material,
we show that Li excess is crucial to enhancing its conductivity by
increasing the occupancy of interstitial sites that promote long-range
Li<sup>+</sup> diffusion between cage-like frameworks. The predicted
room-temperature conductivities and activation barriers are in reasonably
good agreement with experimental values
Role of Na<sup>+</sup> Interstitials and Dopants in Enhancing the Na<sup>+</sup> Conductivity of the Cubic Na<sub>3</sub>PS<sub>4</sub> Superionic Conductor
In this work, we performed a first-principles
investigation of
the phase stability, dopant formation energy and Na<sup>+</sup> conductivity
of pristine and doped cubic Na<sub>3</sub>PS<sub>4</sub> (c-Na<sub>3</sub>PS<sub>4</sub>). We show that pristine c-Na<sub>3</sub>PS<sub>4</sub> is an extremely poor Na ionic conductor, and the introduction
of Na<sup>+</sup> excess is the key to achieving reasonable Na<sup>+</sup> conductivities. We studied the effect of aliovalent doping
of M<sup>4+</sup> for P<sup>5+</sup> in c-Na<sub>3</sub>PS<sub>4</sub>, yielding Na<sub>3+<i>x</i></sub>M<sub><i>x</i></sub>P<sub>1–<i>x</i></sub>S<sub>4</sub> (M = Si,
Ge, and Sn with <i>x</i> = 0.0625; M = Si with <i>x</i> = 0.125). The formation energies in all the doped structures with
dopant concentration of <i>x</i> = 0.0625 are found to be
relatively low. Using <i>ab initio</i> molecular dynamics
simulations, we predict that 6.25% Si-doped c-Na<sub>3</sub>PS<sub>4</sub> has a Na<sup>+</sup> conductivity of 1.66 mS/cm, in excellent
agreement with previous experimental results. Remarkably, we find
that Sn<sup>4+</sup> doping at the same concentration yields a much
higher predicted Na<sup>+</sup> conductivity of 10.7 mS/cm, though
with a higher dopant formation energy. A higher Si<sup>4+</sup> doping
concentration of <i>x</i> = 0.125 also yields a significant
increase in Na<sup>+</sup> conductivity with an even higher dopant
formation energy. Finally, topological and van Hove correlation function
analyses suggest that the channel volume and correlation in Na<sup>+</sup> motions may play important roles in enhancing Na<sup>+</sup> conductivity in this structure
Table_1_Altered Interoceptive Processing in Generalized Anxiety Disorder—A Heartbeat-Evoked Potential Research.pdf
Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is one of the most common anxiety disorders. The brain’s dysfunctional processing of interoceptive information is increasingly recognized as an important component of anxiety disorders. However, the neural mechanisms remain insufficiently understood. In the present study, patients with GAD and healthy control participants underwent an eyes-closed (EC) resting state (interoception) and eyes-open (EO) resting state (exteroception) without paying conscious attention to heartbeat. Electrocardiography (ECG) and electroencephalography (EEG) signals were recorded at the same time. The results show that in healthy controls, the heartbeat-evoked brain potential (HEP) was modulated by the conditions, with a significantly higher amplitude under EC than EO, while this was not the case in GAD patients. Further analysis revealed that the dysfunction of HEP modulation in GAD patients may be attributed to excessive interoceptive processing under EO, with a marginally higher HEP in GAD than in the healthy controls. Finally, the right prefrontal HEP amplitude during EC condition was significantly correlated with the severity of the patients’ anxiety symptoms. Our results suggest that altered cortical processing of interoceptive signals may play an important role in the pathophysiology of generalized anxiety disorder.</p
New Insights into the Interphase between the Na Metal Anode and Sulfide Solid-State Electrolytes: A Joint Experimental and Computational Study
In
this work, we investigated the interface between the sodium anode
and the sulfide-based solid electrolytes Na<sub>3</sub>SbS<sub>4</sub> (NAS), Na<sub>3</sub>PS<sub>4</sub> (NPS), and Cl-doped NPS (NPSC)
in all-solid-state-batteries (ASSBs). Even though these electrolytes
have demonstrated high ionic conductivities in the range of 1 mS cm<sup>–1</sup> at ambient temperatures, sulfide sold-state electrolytes
(SSEs) are known to be unstable with Na metal, though the exact reaction
mechanism and kinetics of the reaction remain unclear. We demonstrate
that the primary cause of capacity fade and cell failure is a chemical
reaction spurred on by electrochemical cycling that takes place at
the interface between the Na anode and the SSEs. To investigate the
properties of the Na-solid electrolyte interphase (SSEI) and its effect
on cell performance, the SSEI was predicted computationally to be
composed of Na<sub>2</sub>S and Na<sub>3</sub>Sb for NAS and identified
experimentally via X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). These two
compounds give the SSEI mixed ionic- and electronic-conducting properties,
which promotes continued SSEI growth, which increases the cell impedance
at the expense of cell performance and cycle life. The SSEI for NPS
was similarly found to be comprised of Na<sub>2</sub>S and Na<sub>3</sub>P, but XPS analysis of Cl-doped NPS (NPSC) showed the presence
of an additional compound at the SSEI, NaCl, which was found to mitigate
the decomposition of NPS. The methodologies presented in this work
can be used to predict and optimize the electrochemical behavior of
an all-solid-state cell. Such joint computational and experimental
efforts can inform strategies for engineering a stable electrolyte
and SSEI to avoid such reactions. Through this work, we call for more
emphasis on SSE compatibility with both anodes and cathodes, essential
for improving the electrochemical properties, longevity, and practicality
of Na-based ASSBs
Elucidating the Limit of Li Insertion into the Spinel Li<sub>4</sub>Ti<sub>5</sub>O<sub>12</sub>
In this work, we
show that the well-known lithium-ion anode material,
Li4Ti5O12, exhibits exceptionally
high initial capacity of 310 mAh g–1 when it is
discharged to 0.01 V. It maintains a reversible capacity of 230 mAh
g–1, far exceeding the “theoretical”
capacity of 175 mAh g–1 when this anode is lithiated
to the composition Li7Ti5O12. Neutron
diffraction analyses identify that additional Li reversibly enters
into the Li7Ti5O12 to form Li8Ti5O12. density functional theory (DFT)
calculations reveal the average potentials of the Li4Ti5O12 to Li7Ti5O12 step and the Li7Ti5O12 to Li8Ti5O12 step are 1.57 and 0.19 V, respectively,
which are in excellent agreement with experimental results. Transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) studies confirm that the irreversible capacity
of Li4Ti5O12 during its first cycle
originates from the formation of a solid electrolyte interface (SEI)
layer. This work clarifies the fundamental lithiation mechanism of
the Li4Ti5O12, when lithiated to
0.01 V vs Li
Elucidating the Limit of Li Insertion into the Spinel Li<sub>4</sub>Ti<sub>5</sub>O<sub>12</sub>
In this work, we
show that the well-known lithium-ion anode material,
Li4Ti5O12, exhibits exceptionally
high initial capacity of 310 mAh g–1 when it is
discharged to 0.01 V. It maintains a reversible capacity of 230 mAh
g–1, far exceeding the “theoretical”
capacity of 175 mAh g–1 when this anode is lithiated
to the composition Li7Ti5O12. Neutron
diffraction analyses identify that additional Li reversibly enters
into the Li7Ti5O12 to form Li8Ti5O12. density functional theory (DFT)
calculations reveal the average potentials of the Li4Ti5O12 to Li7Ti5O12 step and the Li7Ti5O12 to Li8Ti5O12 step are 1.57 and 0.19 V, respectively,
which are in excellent agreement with experimental results. Transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) studies confirm that the irreversible capacity
of Li4Ti5O12 during its first cycle
originates from the formation of a solid electrolyte interface (SEI)
layer. This work clarifies the fundamental lithiation mechanism of
the Li4Ti5O12, when lithiated to
0.01 V vs Li
Elucidating the Limit of Li Insertion into the Spinel Li<sub>4</sub>Ti<sub>5</sub>O<sub>12</sub>
In this work, we
show that the well-known lithium-ion anode material,
Li4Ti5O12, exhibits exceptionally
high initial capacity of 310 mAh g–1 when it is
discharged to 0.01 V. It maintains a reversible capacity of 230 mAh
g–1, far exceeding the “theoretical”
capacity of 175 mAh g–1 when this anode is lithiated
to the composition Li7Ti5O12. Neutron
diffraction analyses identify that additional Li reversibly enters
into the Li7Ti5O12 to form Li8Ti5O12. density functional theory (DFT)
calculations reveal the average potentials of the Li4Ti5O12 to Li7Ti5O12 step and the Li7Ti5O12 to Li8Ti5O12 step are 1.57 and 0.19 V, respectively,
which are in excellent agreement with experimental results. Transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) studies confirm that the irreversible capacity
of Li4Ti5O12 during its first cycle
originates from the formation of a solid electrolyte interface (SEI)
layer. This work clarifies the fundamental lithiation mechanism of
the Li4Ti5O12, when lithiated to
0.01 V vs Li
Elucidating the Limit of Li Insertion into the Spinel Li<sub>4</sub>Ti<sub>5</sub>O<sub>12</sub>
In this work, we
show that the well-known lithium-ion anode material,
Li4Ti5O12, exhibits exceptionally
high initial capacity of 310 mAh g–1 when it is
discharged to 0.01 V. It maintains a reversible capacity of 230 mAh
g–1, far exceeding the “theoretical”
capacity of 175 mAh g–1 when this anode is lithiated
to the composition Li7Ti5O12. Neutron
diffraction analyses identify that additional Li reversibly enters
into the Li7Ti5O12 to form Li8Ti5O12. density functional theory (DFT)
calculations reveal the average potentials of the Li4Ti5O12 to Li7Ti5O12 step and the Li7Ti5O12 to Li8Ti5O12 step are 1.57 and 0.19 V, respectively,
which are in excellent agreement with experimental results. Transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) studies confirm that the irreversible capacity
of Li4Ti5O12 during its first cycle
originates from the formation of a solid electrolyte interface (SEI)
layer. This work clarifies the fundamental lithiation mechanism of
the Li4Ti5O12, when lithiated to
0.01 V vs Li
