6 research outputs found
Linear mixed model analysis of the effect of baseline number of HF on baseline values of VA and CRT, and VA and CRT changes.
No full textLinear mixed model analysis of the effect of baseline number of HF on baseline values of VA and CRT, and VA and CRT changes.</p
Hyperreflective foci on SD-OCT before and after treatment with anti-VEGF.
No full textFoveal centered spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) B-scan image of a patient with DME before (A) and after (B) 3 injections with anti-VEGF. Black arrows indicate hyperreflective foci, within 3000 μm of the fovea (dashed bars).</p
Differences between before and after treatment with anti-VEGF.
No full textMean changes in central retinal thickness (A), visual acuity (B) and number of hyperreflective foci (C) at baseline and after 3 injections with anti-VEGF. The bars represent mean ± 95% confidence interval. *P<0.05.</p
Difference in number of HF at baseline, and change in HF between eyes with adequate response versus insufficient response.
No full textMean number of HF at baseline in groups based on insufficient and adequate CRT response (A); insufficient and adequate VA response (B); and insufficient and adequate combined CRT + VA response (C). Mean change in number of HF in groups based on insufficient and adequate CRT response (D); insufficient and adequate VA response (E); and insufficient and adequate combined CRT + VA response (F). The distribution of HF in the inner and outer retinal layers is displayed as a percentage. The values represent the odds ratio with corresponding 95% confidence interval and p-value. The odds ratio of adequate response is 1.106, which can be interpreted as an increase, or chance, for adequate response by 10.6% for every HF at baseline; when the number of HF at baseline increases by 10, the chance for adequate response increases exponentially by 1.10610 = 2.74 or 274%. The bars represent mean ± 95% confidence interval and are based on descriptive statistics. *P<0.05.</p
