Comparison of <i>TPAP</i> results for various values of <i>N</i> (<i>m</i> = 10).

<p>Comparison of <i>TPAP</i> results for various values of <i>N</i> (<i>m</i> = 10).</p

Experimental results for another access log file (<i>N</i> = 20,000).

<p>Experimental results for another access log file (<i>N</i> = 20,000).</p

An example of using different conditions to make predictions.

An example of using different conditions to make predictions.</p

Comparative CHRs obtained from different prefetching algorithms based on single-user mode.

Comparative CHRs obtained from different prefetching algorithms based on single-user mode.</p

Comparative CHRs and disk access ratio based on different matching radius.

Comparative CHRs and disk access ratio based on different matching radius.</p

Comparative CHRs obtained from GUDC using different prefetching steps.

Comparative CHRs obtained from GUDC using different prefetching steps.</p

Comparison of <i>TPAP</i> results at various scales of <i>m</i> (<i>N</i> = 10,000).

<p>Comparison of <i>TPAP</i> results at various scales of <i>m</i> (<i>N</i> = 10,000).</p

The datasets used in this analysis.

<p>^aAll data were relabeled with natural numbers ranging from zero to the length of the dataset.</p><p>^bEach access sequence recorded only the labels of the data in chronological order.</p><p>^* As stated in section 4.1, only of the 20% files will be requested.</p><p>^** All files will be requested.</p><p>The datasets used in this analysis.</p

The adaptability of APSA to different datasets (<i>N</i> = 10,000).

<p>The adaptability of APSA to different datasets (<i>N</i> = 10,000).</p

Adaptability experiment based on the INS dataset (<i>N</i> = 20,000).

<p>Adaptability experiment based on the INS dataset (<i>N</i> = 20,000).</p