Efficient deterministic approximate counting for low-degree polynomial threshold functions

We give a deterministic algorithm for approximately counting satisfying assignments of a degree-$d$ polynomial threshold function (PTF). Given a degree-$d$ input polynomial $p(x_1,\dots,x_n)$ over $R^n$ and a parameter $\epsilon> 0$, our algorithm approximates $\Pr_{x \sim \{-1,1\}^n}[p(x) \geq 0]$ to within an additive $\pm \epsilon$ in time $O_{d,\epsilon}(1)\cdot \mathop{poly}(n^d)$. (Any sort of efficient multiplicative approximation is impossible even for randomized algorithms assuming $NP\not=RP$.) Note that the running time of our algorithm (as a function of $n^d$, the number of coefficients of a degree-$d$ PTF) is a \emph{fixed} polynomial. The fastest previous algorithm for this problem (due to Kane), based on constructions of unconditional pseudorandom generators for degree-$d$ PTFs, runs in time $n^{O_{d,c}(1) \cdot \epsilon^{-c}}$ for all $c > 0$. The key novel contributions of this work are: A new multivariate central limit theorem, proved using tools from Malliavin calculus and Stein's Method. This new CLT shows that any collection of Gaussian polynomials with small eigenvalues must have a joint distribution which is very close to a multidimensional Gaussian distribution. A new decomposition of low-degree multilinear polynomials over Gaussian inputs. Roughly speaking we show that (up to some small error) any such polynomial can be decomposed into a bounded number of multilinear polynomials all of which have extremely small eigenvalues. We use these new ingredients to give a deterministic algorithm for a Gaussian-space version of the approximate counting problem, and then employ standard techniques for working with low-degree PTFs (invariance principles and regularity lemmas) to reduce the original approximate counting problem over the Boolean hypercube to the Gaussian version

Fooling intersections of low-weight halfspaces

A weight-$t$ halfspace is a Boolean function $f(x)=$sign$(w_1 x_1 + \cdots + w_n x_n - \theta)$ where each $w_i$ is an integer in $\{-t,\dots,t\}.$ We give an explicit pseudorandom generator that $\delta$-fools any intersection of $k$ weight-$t$ halfspaces with seed length poly$(\log n, \log k,t,1/\delta)$. In particular, our result gives an explicit PRG that fools any intersection of any quasipoly$(n)$ number of halfspaces of any poly$\log(n)$ weight to any $1/$poly$\log(n)$ accuracy using seed length poly$\log(n).$ Prior to this work no explicit PRG with non-trivial seed length was known even for fooling intersections of $n$ weight-1 halfspaces to constant accuracy. The analysis of our PRG fuses techniques from two different lines of work on unconditional pseudorandomness for different kinds of Boolean functions. We extend the approach of Harsha, Klivans and Meka \cite{HKM12} for fooling intersections of regular halfspaces, and combine this approach with results of Bazzi \cite{Bazzi:07} and Razborov \cite{Razborov:09} on bounded independence fooling CNF formulas. Our analysis introduces new coupling-based ingredients into the standard Lindeberg method for establishing quantitative central limit theorems and associated pseudorandomness results.Comment: 27 page

Improved Pseudorandom Generators from Pseudorandom Multi-Switching Lemmas

We give the best known pseudorandom generators for two touchstone classes in unconditional derandomization: an $\varepsilon$-PRG for the class of size-$M$ depth-$d$ $\mathsf{AC}^0$ circuits with seed length $\log(M)^{d+O(1)}\cdot \log(1/\varepsilon)$, and an $\varepsilon$-PRG for the class of $S$-sparse $\mathbb{F}_2$ polynomials with seed length $2^{O(\sqrt{\log S})}\cdot \log(1/\varepsilon)$. These results bring the state of the art for unconditional derandomization of these classes into sharp alignment with the state of the art for computational hardness for all parameter settings: improving on the seed lengths of either PRG would require breakthrough progress on longstanding and notorious circuit lower bounds. The key enabling ingredient in our approach is a new \emph{pseudorandom multi-switching lemma}. We derandomize recently-developed \emph{multi}-switching lemmas, which are powerful generalizations of H{\aa}stad's switching lemma that deal with \emph{families} of depth-two circuits. Our pseudorandom multi-switching lemma---a randomness-efficient algorithm for sampling restrictions that simultaneously simplify all circuits in a family---achieves the parameters obtained by the (full randomness) multi-switching lemmas of Impagliazzo, Matthews, and Paturi [IMP12] and H{\aa}stad [H{\aa}s14]. This optimality of our derandomization translates into the optimality (given current circuit lower bounds) of our PRGs for $\mathsf{AC}^0$ and sparse $\mathbb{F}_2$ polynomials

Testing probability distributions using conditional samples

We study a new framework for property testing of probability distributions, by considering distribution testing algorithms that have access to a conditional sampling oracle.* This is an oracle that takes as input a subset $S \subseteq [N]$ of the domain $[N]$ of the unknown probability distribution $D$ and returns a draw from the conditional probability distribution $D$ restricted to $S$. This new model allows considerable flexibility in the design of distribution testing algorithms; in particular, testing algorithms in this model can be adaptive. We study a wide range of natural distribution testing problems in this new framework and some of its variants, giving both upper and lower bounds on query complexity. These problems include testing whether $D$ is the uniform distribution $\mathcal{U}$; testing whether $D = D^\ast$ for an explicitly provided $D^\ast$; testing whether two unknown distributions $D_1$ and $D_2$ are equivalent; and estimating the variation distance between $D$ and the uniform distribution. At a high level our main finding is that the new "conditional sampling" framework we consider is a powerful one: while all the problems mentioned above have $\Omega(\sqrt{N})$ sample complexity in the standard model (and in some cases the complexity must be almost linear in $N$), we give $\mathrm{poly}(\log N, 1/\varepsilon)$-query algorithms (and in some cases $\mathrm{poly}(1/\varepsilon)$-query algorithms independent of $N$) for all these problems in our conditional sampling setting. *Independently from our work, Chakraborty et al. also considered this framework. We discuss their work in Subsection [1.4].Comment: Significant changes on Section 9 (detailing and expanding the proof of Theorem 16). Several clarifications and typos fixed in various place