99 research outputs found

    Multiple comparisons of log anti-<i>T</i>. <i>pallidum</i> titers in 4 groups with a different stage of genital ulceration in baboons

    No full text
    <p>([CNA] = clinically non-affected (n = 20), [INI] = initial (n = 14), [MOD] = moderate (n = 7), and [SEV] = severe genital ulceration (n = 16); for stage definition see [<a href="http://www.plosntds.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003637#pntd.0003637.ref018" target="_blank">18</a>]), GU = genital ulceration. Anti-<i>T</i>. <i>pallidum</i> antibody quantification was investigated using the Serodia TP-PA. Kruskal-Wallis test using Dunn’s correction for multiple comparison: CNA vs. SEV mean rank diff. = -30.04, p ≤ 0.0001; CNA vs. MOD mean rank diff. = -19.95, p ≤ 0.05; INI vs. SEV mean rank diff. = -17.56, p ≤ 0.05. (mean ± SEM).</p

    Comparison of the serological tests with the consensus of infection status (Table 2).

    No full text
    <p>Comparison of the serological tests with the consensus of infection status (<a href="http://www.plosntds.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003637#pntd.0003637.t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a>).</p

    PCG duration model by females.

    No full text
    GLMMs evaluating if the duration of female PCG was affected by the presence of copulation calls and type of copulation (ejaculatory vs non-ejaculatory).</p

    Performance characteristics of the serological tests used in this study, as reported by the manufacturer. Sen = Sensitivity, Spec = Specificity, n.p. = not provided.

    No full text
    <p>Performance characteristics of the serological tests used in this study, as reported by the manufacturer. Sen = Sensitivity, Spec = Specificity, n.p. = not provided.</p

    <i>T</i>. <i>pallidum</i> test algorithm for the screening of wild non-treated baboons.

    No full text
    <p>Based on the test performances Espline TP is recommended as the initial screening test followed by a confirmatory test e.g. Mastablot TP IgG that has been identified as most reliable standard. Dashed lines indicate reported results, while continuous lines represent the workflow.</p

    Female copulation call interaction model.

    No full text
    Binary GLMM evaluating if the likelihood of uttering a copulation call is affected by the male and female GHS and the type of copulation. Estimates, standard errors (SE), z-values, and 2.5% and 97.5% confidence intervals (CI) are shown for fixed effects. Intercept with a reference category for ulcerated individuals and ejaculatory events. (DOCX)</p
    corecore