Comparative results of open lower extremity revascularization in nonagenarians

IntroductionThe average lifespan in the United States continues to lengthen. We have observed a similar trend in our patients, with an increased number of nonagenarians presenting for evaluation of vascular disease. This study evaluated outcomes of lower extremity revascularization in patients aged ≥90 years.MethodsThe vascular registry at Albany Medical College was retrospectively reviewed for all lower extremity bypasses performed between 1996 and 2006. We evaluated patient demographics, indications, procedure, patency rates, and complications. Patients were divided into groups based on age ≥90 years (≥90 group) and <90 years (<90 group). Variables were evaluated by χ2 analysis. Outcomes were prepared using life-table methods and compared with log-rank analysis.ResultsDuring the last 10 years, 5443 lower extremity bypasses were performed on patients aged <90 years and 150 on patients aged ≥90 years. The <90 group had significantly more men (61.4% vs 29.3%) and was obviously younger, at 68 years (range 7-89 years) vs 92 years (range, 90-101 years). The <90 group had more comorbidities in terms of diabetes, active tobacco use, and hypercholesterolemia. No significant difference was noted in coronary artery disease or chronic renal insufficiency between the groups. Critical limb ischemia as an indication was significantly higher in the ≥90 group (149 [99%] vs 4472 [82%]; P < .0.5). Strikingly, the primary patency was significantly higher in the ≥90 group at 4 years (77% vs 62%; P < .05). Complication and amputation rates did not differ between the groups. Perioperative (15% vs 3%; P < .05) and 1-year (45% vs 11%; P < .05) mortality rates were significantly higher in the ≥90 group.ConclusionLower extremity bypass for nonagenarians offers acceptable patency and limb salvage but at a significantly higher mortality rate

Brachial artery reconstruction for occlusive disease: A 12-year experience

AbstractObjective: Symptomatic arterial disease of the upper extremity is an uncommon problem. In this study, we evaluate our results with brachial artery reconstruction in patients who present with symptomatic atherosclerotic occlusive disease and compare this cohort's demographics with a similar group with lower extremity ischemia. Methods: From 1986 to 1998, all patients presenting for upper extremity revascularization with chronic ischemia were prospectively entered into a vascular registry. Demographics, indications, outcomes, and patency were recorded. Patients presenting with embolus, pseudoaneurysm, or trauma were excluded. The Fisher exact and Student t tests were used to assess significance. Results: Fifty-one (83%) bypass grafts were performed with autogenous conduit and the remainder with polytetrafluoroethylene. Indications included 18 (30%) patients with exertional arm pain, 35 (57%) with rest pain, and 8 (13%) with tissue loss. Twenty-five (45%) patients were male, 8 (14%) had diabetes, and 30 (54%) were smokers. The mean age was 58 years (range, 33-93). The operative mortality rate was 1.8%, and follow-up ranged from 1 to 140 months. Eight occlusions were identified, with six occurring early. Five of these were in women with a smoking history. Only one of the 26 reconstructions that did not cross a joint occluded, whereas bypass grafts that did cross a joint occluded more frequently. No other major complications were recognized. Conclusion: Arm revascularization for ischemia can be performed with reasonable mortality and morbidity rates. These patients may represent a different subgroup of atherosclerotic disease than those with lower extremity involvement: they are more commonly women and smokers and less likely to be diabetic. (J Vasc Surg 2001;33:802-5.