Overall Assessed Risk of Bias within the 14 Included Studies.

<p>Overall Assessed Risk of Bias within the 14 Included Studies.</p

Additional file 1: of Regulating health and nutrition claims in the UK using a nutrient profile model: an explorative modelled health impact assessment

Supplementary information including further background information, description of model scenarios, and results. (PDF 855 kb

Overall Assessed Risk of Bias within the 14 Included Studies.

<p>Overall Assessed Risk of Bias within the 14 Included Studies.</p

Example Search Criteria for Databases.

<p>Example Search Criteria for Databases.</p

Forest Plot Showing the Standardised Mean Difference in Change in TPA between Intervention (n = 2749) and Control (n = 2106).

<p>Groups across the 10 included studies reporting TPA data.</p

Forest Plot of Mean Difference in Change in MVPA between Intervention (n = 3212) and Control (n = 2578).

<p>Groups across the 12 included studies reporting MVPA data.</p

Fig 4 -

Validation of the model by comparison of modelled estimates of prevalence of ever having had MI with external estimates from the Health Survey for England 2017 for men (A) and women (B). Black vertical bars represent 95% confidence intervals for the prevalence of ever having had MI for 1998, 2003, 2006 and 2011, which were used in the model parameterisation process. Red vertical bars represent 95% confidence intervals for prevalence in 2017, which was not used in the model parameterisation process.</p

Funnel Plots Showing the Observed Effects for the 12 studies reporting MVPA (left) and the 10 studies reporting TPA (right).

<p>Funnel Plots Showing the Observed Effects for the 12 studies reporting MVPA (left) and the 10 studies reporting TPA (right).</p

Fig 1 -

Modelled incidence rates of first MI by age group for men (A) and women (B), 1998–2035.</p

Flow chart describing the steps taken to assign disease specific expenditures.

Flow chart describing the steps taken to assign disease specific expenditures.</p