18 research outputs found

    The Impact of Ethics on Job criminalization

    Get PDF
    The criminalization of some jobs can be traced in the law system of all countries. The criteria for this criminalization vary according to the legal system of each country. In Iran, job criminalization is based on the approach of Imami jurisprudence, which is a text-oriented and sometimes intellect-oriented paradigm. Therefore, jurisprudence determines whether a job is criminal or not. Along with theology and ethics, the science of jurisprudence constitutes the three scientific pillars of Islam. The relationship between these three is one of the fundamental discussions that have great impacts on the attitude of scholars of jurisprudence in dealing with issues. Among these, the relationship between ethics and jurisprudence is very important because these two are formed on the basis of instructions and warnings and it has caused a disagreement among Islamic scholars about their relationship. Some deny their relationship, some believe that ethics requires jurisprudence, and some consider jurisprudence to require ethical supervision. These variations have led to differences in their perceptions of issues. Of course, looking at the meaning of ethics and jurisprudence, it is clear that the two are in close contact with each other, and since human behavior must be accepted by God in order to lead to human happiness, ethics acts as an observer of jurisprudence. This effect is sometimes based on the imaginary and affirmative principles of jurisprudence, and sometimes on the methods of jurisprudence. These effects can be observed in the difference between a job criminalization, which is mentioned in this article

    The Impact of Ethics on Job criminalization

    No full text
    The criminalization of some jobs can be traced in the law system of all countries. The criteria for this criminalization vary according to the legal system of each country. In Iran, job criminalization is based on the approach of Imami jurisprudence, which is a text-oriented and sometimes intellect-oriented paradigm. Therefore, jurisprudence determines whether a job is criminal or not. Along with theology and ethics, the science of jurisprudence constitutes the three scientific pillars of Islam. The relationship between these three is one of the fundamental discussions that have great impacts on the attitude of scholars of jurisprudence in dealing with issues. Among these, the relationship between ethics and jurisprudence is very important because these two are formed on the basis of instructions and warnings and it has caused a disagreement among Islamic scholars about their relationship. Some deny their relationship, some believe that ethics requires jurisprudence, and some consider jurisprudence to require ethical supervision. These variations have led to differences in their perceptions of issues. Of course, looking at the meaning of ethics and jurisprudence, it is clear that the two are in close contact with each other, and since human behavior must be accepted by God in order to lead to human happiness, ethics acts as an observer of jurisprudence. This effect is sometimes based on the imaginary and affirmative principles of jurisprudence, and sometimes on the methods of jurisprudence. These effects can be observed in the difference between a job criminalization, which is mentioned in this article.La criminalización de algunos trabajos se puede rastrear en el sistema legal de todos los países. Los criterios para esta criminalización varían según el sistema legal de cada país. En Irán, la criminalización del trabajo se basa en el enfoque de la jurisprudencia Imami, que es un paradigma orientado al texto y, a veces, al intelecto. Por tanto, la jurisprudencia determina si un trabajo es criminal o no. Junto con la teología y la ética, la ciencia de la jurisprudencia constituye los tres pilares científicos del Islam. La relación entre estos tres es una de las discusiones fundamentales que tienen un gran impacto en la actitud de los estudiosos de la jurisprudencia al abordar los temas. Entre estos, la relación entre ética y jurisprudencia es muy importante porque estos dos se forman sobre la base de instrucciones y advertencias y ha causado un desacuerdo entre los eruditos islámicos sobre su relación. Algunos niegan su relación, algunos creen que la ética requiere jurisprudencia y algunos consideran que la jurisprudencia requiere supervisión ética. Estas variaciones han dado lugar a diferencias en sus percepciones de los problemas. Por supuesto, al observar el significado de la ética y la jurisprudencia, queda claro que las dos están en estrecho contacto entre sí, y dado que el comportamiento humano debe ser aceptado por Dios para conducir a la felicidad humana, la ética actúa como observadora de la jurisprudencia. . Este efecto a veces se basa en los principios imaginarios y afirmativos de la jurisprudencia y, a veces, en los métodos de la jurisprudencia. Estos efectos se pueden observar en la diferencia entre una criminalización laboral, que se menciona en este artículo

    The Impact of Ethics on Job criminalization

    No full text
    The criminalization of some jobs can be traced in the law system of all countries. The criteria for this criminalization vary according to the legal system of each country. In Iran, job criminalization is based on the approach of Imami jurisprudence, which is a text-oriented and sometimes intellect-oriented paradigm. Therefore, jurisprudence determines whether a job is criminal or not. Along with theology and ethics, the science of jurisprudence constitutes the three scientific pillars of Islam. The relationship between these three is one of the fundamental discussions that have great impacts on the attitude of scholars of jurisprudence in dealing with issues. Among these, the relationship between ethics and jurisprudence is very important because these two are formed on the basis of instructions and warnings and it has caused a disagreement among Islamic scholars about their relationship. Some deny their relationship, some believe that ethics requires jurisprudence, and some consider jurisprudence to require ethical supervision. These variations have led to differences in their perceptions of issues. Of course, looking at the meaning of ethics and jurisprudence, it is clear that the two are in close contact with each other, and since human behavior must be accepted by God in order to lead to human happiness, ethics acts as an observer of jurisprudence. This effect is sometimes based on the imaginary and affirmative principles of jurisprudence, and sometimes on the methods of jurisprudence. These effects can be observed in the difference between a job criminalization, which is mentioned in this article.</jats:p

    Innovative immunotherapies and emerging treatments in type 1 diabetes management

    No full text
    Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by the selective destruction of pancreatic insulin-producing beta cells, primarily mediated by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. This review comprehensively examines the latest advances in immunotherapeutic approaches to T1D, categorizing current strategies into four main groups: antigen-independent therapies, antigen-dependent therapies, beta cell therapies, and stem cell therapies. Antigen-independent strategies, such as antibody-based therapies (e.g., Abatacept and Teplizumab) and cytokine inhibitors (e.g., Anakinra and Etanercept), have shown potential in preserving beta cell function by modulating immune responses. Antigen-dependent strategies focus on inducing immune tolerance to specific beta cell antigens, with mixed results from clinical trials involving autoantigen vaccines like GAD65. Beta cell therapies, including islet transplantation, offer promising outcomes but face challenges related to immunosuppression and donor availability. Stem cell therapies, particularly using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and autologous hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), demonstrate potential in immune modulation and beta cell regeneration. Novel approaches, such as Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)–Tregs therapy and JAK-STAT pathway inhibition, represent exciting areas of ongoing research. This comprehensive overview underscores the necessity of personalized therapeutic approaches and continued research to optimize existing therapies and explore new targets, ultimately aiming to improve outcomes and achieve a potential cure for T1D

    Minocycline Improves Memory by Enhancing Hippocampal Synaptic Plasticity and Restoring Antioxidant Enzyme Activity in a Rat Model of Cerebral Ischemia-Reperfusion

    No full text
    Introduction: Oxidative stress plays a crucial role in the impairment of synaptic plasticity following cerebral ischemia, ultimately resulting in memory dysfunction. Hence, the applying antioxidant agents could be beneficial in managing memory deficits after brain ischemia. Minocycline is a tetracycline antibiotic with antioxidant effect. The main objective of this work was to assess the minocycline effect on the impairment of synaptic plasticity and memory after cerebral ischemia-reperfusion in rats. Methods: Transient occlusion of common carotid arteries was used to induce ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats. Single or multiple (once daily for 7 days) dose(s) of minocycline were administered before (pretreatment) or after (treatment) brain ischemia. Seven days after ischemia-reperfusion, passive avoidance performance, long-term hippocampal potentiation, and the activity of antioxidant enzymes were assessed.  Results: The passive avoidance test showed that minocycline (20 and 40 mg/kg) significantly increased step-through latency while reducing the duration of staying in a dark chamber in the treatment (but not pretreatment) group. In electrophysiological experiments, the rats treated (but not pretreated) with minocycline (40 mg/kg) showed a significant increase in the amplitude of the field excitatory postsynaptic potentials in the dentate gyrus area of the hippocampus. The treatment (but not pretreatment) with minocycline (20 and 40 mg/kg) resulted in a significant increase in the activity of catalase, glutathione peroxidase, and superoxide dismutase in the hippocampus.  Conclusion: It was determined that minocycline attenuates memory dysfunction after cerebral ischemia-reperfusion in rats by improving hippocampal synaptic plasticity and restoring antioxidant enzyme activity
    corecore