How do adolescents experience a newly developed online single session sleep intervention for adolescents?: a think-aloud study

Background: Sleep problems are common in adolescents and have detrimental impacts on physical and mental health and daily functioning. Evidence-based treatment like cognitive behaviour therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is often hard to access, and adolescents may not engage in and adhere to longer, clinician-delivered interventions. Brief, self-guided, and accessible sleep interventions are needed.Objective: To explore the user experience of a prototype online self-help single session sleep intervention developed for adolescents. Methods: Eleven participants aged 17-19 years (8 females, 3 males) took part in online retrospective think-aloud interviews. Participants first completed the prototype intervention independently and were then shown the intervention page by page and asked to verbalise their thoughts and experiences. Transcripts were analyzed thematically. Results: Participants found the intervention helpful for sleep. Four themes were generated - ‘Educative: Learning, but more fun’, ‘Effortless: Quicker and Easier’, ‘Personalization: Power of Choice’, and ‘Positivity: Just Good Vibes’. The theme ‘Educative: Learning, but more fun’ encompassed two sub-themes ‘Opportunity to Learn’ and ‘Aesthetics and Learning’. These themes reflected participants’ views that the intervention was educative, personalised, solution-oriented and easy to use, but could incorporate more graphics and visuals to aid in learning and could be made more effortless and positive through modifications to its design. Conclusions:Findings convey the importance of ensuring educative well-designed content, personalization, a positive tone, and ease of use while designing interventions targeting adolescents’s sleep and mental health. They also indicate areas for further developing the intervention. </p

AUT710215_Lay_Abstract – Supplemental material for Emotion awareness and cognitive behavioural therapy in young people with autism spectrum disorder

Supplemental material, AUT710215_Lay_Abstract for Emotion awareness and cognitive behavioural therapy in young people with autism spectrum disorder by Cara Roberts-Collins, Gerwyn Mahoney-Davies, Ailsa Russell, Anne Booth and Maria Loades in Autism</p

How do adolescents experience a newly developed online single session sleep intervention for adolescents?: a think-aloud study

Background: Sleep problems are common in adolescents and have detrimental impacts on physical and mental health and daily functioning. Evidence-based treatment like cognitive behaviour therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is often hard to access, and adolescents may not engage in and adhere to longer, clinician-delivered interventions. Brief, self-guided, and accessible sleep interventions are needed.Objective: To explore the user experience of a prototype online self-help single session sleep intervention developed for adolescents. Methods: Eleven participants aged 17-19 years (8 females, 3 males) took part in online retrospective think-aloud interviews. Participants first completed the prototype intervention independently and were then shown the intervention page by page and asked to verbalise their thoughts and experiences. Transcripts were analyzed thematically. Results: Participants found the intervention helpful for sleep. Four themes were generated - ‘Educative: Learning, but more fun’, ‘Effortless: Quicker and Easier’, ‘Personalization: Power of Choice’, and ‘Positivity: Just Good Vibes’. The theme ‘Educative: Learning, but more fun’ encompassed two sub-themes ‘Opportunity to Learn’ and ‘Aesthetics and Learning’. These themes reflected participants’ views that the intervention was educative, personalised, solution-oriented and easy to use, but could incorporate more graphics and visuals to aid in learning and could be made more effortless and positive through modifications to its design. Conclusions:Findings convey the importance of ensuring educative well-designed content, personalization, a positive tone, and ease of use while designing interventions targeting adolescents’s sleep and mental health. They also indicate areas for further developing the intervention. </p

Supplemental Material - Self-evaluation and depression in adolescents with a chronic illness: A systematic review

Supplemental Material for Self-evaluation and depression in adolescents with a chronic illness: A systematic review by E Hards, F Orchard, S Khalid, C D’souza, F Cohen, E Gowie and ME Loades in Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry</p

Self-evaluation and depression in adolescents with a chronic illness: a systematic review

Objective To conduct a systematic review to establish what is known about the relationship between depression and self-evaluation in adolescents with a chronic illness. Methods A systematic search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, and hand-searching. We sought to identify primary research that examined both the cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between depression and self-evaluation in adolescents with chronic illness. The search resulted in 8941 retrieved articles that were screened against an inclusion criteria. A total of 4 papers were included in the review. The MMAT used to assess study methodological quality. Results A narrative synthesis was conducted, and a summary figure was included. These 4 studies included 236 adolescents aged 9–18 years with depression and either Type 1 Diabetes (T1D), chronic pain, headaches, or Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). The limited existing evidence indicated that that depression was associated with negative self-evaluation in adolescents in some but not all chronic illnesses investigated to date. We also found some evidence that psychological intervention can help to improve self-evaluation, specifically in adolescents with T1D. Conclusions More robust studies of the association between self-evaluation and depression in adolescents with a chronic illness is needed, with attention to the nuances of differences between chronic illnesses. The existing evidence indicates that there may be a stronger association in some chronic illnesses. Pilot data suggest that specific psychological therapies may improve self-evaluation, although much more extensive evaluation is needed

A multi-stakeholders perspective on how to improve psychological treatments for depression in young people

No description supplie

Investigating the efficacy of the Web-Based Common Elements Toolbox (COMET) single-session interventions in improving UK university student well-being: randomized controlled trial

Background: Mental health problems in university students are associated with many negative outcomes, yet there is a gap between need and timely access to help. Single-session interventions (SSIs) are designed to be scalable and accessible, delivering core evidence-based intervention components within a one-off encounter. Objective: COMET (Common Elements Toolbox) is an online self-help SSI that includes behavioral activation, cognitive restructuring, gratitude, and self-compassion. COMET has previously been evaluated in India, Kenya, and the United States with promising results. This study tests the acceptability, appropriateness, perceived utility, and efficacy of COMET among UK university students during the peripandemic period. Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of COMET compared with a control group, with 2- and 4-week follow-ups. Outcome variables were subjective well-being, depression severity, anxiety severity, positive affect, negative affect, and perceived stress. We also measured intervention satisfaction immediately after completion of COMET. All UK university students with access to the internet were eligible to participate and were informed of the study online. The data were analyzed using linear mixed models and reported in accordance with the CONSORT-EHEALTH (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials of Electronic and Mobile Health Applications and Online Telehealth) checklist. Results: Of the 831 people screened, 468 participants were randomized to a condition, 407 completed the postintervention survey, 147 returned the 2-week follow-up survey, 118 returned the 4-week follow-up survey, and 89 returned both. Of the 239 randomized, 212 completed COMET. Significant between-group differences in favor of the COMET intervention were observed at 2-week follow-ups for subjective well-being (Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale; mean difference [MD] 1.39, 95% CI 0.19-2.61; P=.03), depression severity (9-item Patient Health Questionnaire; MD –1.31, 95% CI –2.51 to –0.12; P=.03), and perceived stress (4-item Perceived Stress Scale; MD –1.33, 95% CI –2.10 to –0.57; PConclusions: This study demonstrated high engagement with the COMET intervention, along with preliminary short-term efficacy. Almost all participants completed the intervention, but study attrition was high. Participant feedback indicated a high level of overall satisfaction with the intervention, with perceived accessibility, immediate benefits, and potential long-term impact being notable findings. These findings support the potential value of COMET as a mental health intervention and highlight important areas for further improvement.</p