1 research outputs found
Branching Ratios in Reactions of OH Radicals with Methylamine, Dimethylamine, and Ethylamine
The
branching ratios for the reaction of the OH radical with the
primary and secondary alkylamines: methylamine (MA), dimethylamine
(DMA), and ethylamine (EA), have been determined using the technique
of pulsed laser photolysis–laser-induced fluorescence. Titration
of the carbon-centered radical, formed following the initial OH abstraction,
with oxygen to give HO<sub>2</sub> and an imine, followed by conversion
of HO<sub>2</sub> to OH by reaction with NO, resulted in biexponential
OH decay traces on a millisecond time scale. Analysis of the biexponential
curves gave the HO<sub>2</sub> yield, which equaled the branching
ratio for abstraction at αC–H position, <i>r</i><sub>αC–H</sub>. The technique was validated by reproducing
known branching ratios for OH abstraction for methanol and ethanol.
For the amines studied in this work (all at 298 K): <i>r</i><sub>αC–H,MA</sub> = 0.76 ± 0.08, <i>r</i><sub>αC–H,DMA</sub> = 0.59 ± 0.07, and <i>r</i><sub>αC–H,EA</sub> = 0.49 ± 0.06 where
the errors are a combination in quadrature of statistical errors at
the 2σ level and an estimated 10% systematic error. The branching
ratios <i>r</i><sub>αC–H</sub> for OH reacting
with (CH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>NH and CH<sub>3</sub>CH<sub>2</sub>NH<sub>2</sub> are in agreement with those obtained for the OD reaction
with (CH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>ND (<i>d</i>-DMA) and CH<sub>3</sub>CH<sub>2</sub>ND<sub>2</sub> (<i>d</i>-EA): <i>r</i><sub>αC–H,d‑DMA</sub> = 0.71 ±
0.12 and <i>r</i><sub>αC–H,d‑EA</sub> = 0.54 ± 0.07. A master equation analysis (using the MESMER
package) based on potential energy surfaces from G4 theory was used
to demonstrate that the experimental determinations are unaffected
by formation of stabilized peroxy radicals and to estimate atmospheric
pressure yields. The branching ratio for imine formation through the
reaction of O<sub>2</sub> with α carbon-centered radicals at
1 atm of N<sub>2</sub> are estimated as <i>r</i><sub>CH2NH2</sub> = 0.79 ± 0.15, <i>r</i><sub>CH2NHCH3</sub> = 0.72
± 0.19, and <i>r</i><sub>CH3CHNH2</sub> = 0.50 ±
0.18. The implications of this work on the potential formation of
nitrosamines and nitramines are briefly discussed