132 research outputs found

    Convergence of Unregularized Online Learning Algorithms

    Full text link
    In this paper we study the convergence of online gradient descent algorithms in reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces (RKHSs) without regularization. We establish a sufficient condition and a necessary condition for the convergence of excess generalization errors in expectation. A sufficient condition for the almost sure convergence is also given. With high probability, we provide explicit convergence rates of the excess generalization errors for both averaged iterates and the last iterate, which in turn also imply convergence rates with probability one. To our best knowledge, this is the first high-probability convergence rate for the last iterate of online gradient descent algorithms without strong convexity. Without any boundedness assumptions on iterates, our results are derived by a novel use of two measures of the algorithm's one-step progress, respectively by generalization errors and by distances in RKHSs, where the variances of the involved martingales are cancelled out by the descent property of the algorithm

    Convergence of Online Mirror Descent

    Full text link
    In this paper we consider online mirror descent (OMD) algorithms, a class of scalable online learning algorithms exploiting data geometric structures through mirror maps. Necessary and sufficient conditions are presented in terms of the step size sequence {ηt}t\{\eta_t\}_{t} for the convergence of an OMD algorithm with respect to the expected Bregman distance induced by the mirror map. The condition is limtηt=0,t=1ηt=\lim_{t\to\infty}\eta_t=0, \sum_{t=1}^{\infty}\eta_t=\infty in the case of positive variances. It is reduced to t=1ηt=\sum_{t=1}^{\infty}\eta_t=\infty in the case of zero variances for which the linear convergence may be achieved by taking a constant step size sequence. A sufficient condition on the almost sure convergence is also given. We establish tight error bounds under mild conditions on the mirror map, the loss function, and the regularizer. Our results are achieved by some novel analysis on the one-step progress of the OMD algorithm using smoothness and strong convexity of the mirror map and the loss function.Comment: Published in Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, 202

    Multi-class SVMs: From Tighter Data-Dependent Generalization Bounds to Novel Algorithms

    Full text link
    This paper studies the generalization performance of multi-class classification algorithms, for which we obtain, for the first time, a data-dependent generalization error bound with a logarithmic dependence on the class size, substantially improving the state-of-the-art linear dependence in the existing data-dependent generalization analysis. The theoretical analysis motivates us to introduce a new multi-class classification machine based on p\ell_p-norm regularization, where the parameter pp controls the complexity of the corresponding bounds. We derive an efficient optimization algorithm based on Fenchel duality theory. Benchmarks on several real-world datasets show that the proposed algorithm can achieve significant accuracy gains over the state of the art

    Local Rademacher Complexity-based Learning Guarantees for Multi-Task Learning

    Full text link
    We show a Talagrand-type concentration inequality for Multi-Task Learning (MTL), using which we establish sharp excess risk bounds for MTL in terms of distribution- and data-dependent versions of the Local Rademacher Complexity (LRC). We also give a new bound on the LRC for norm regularized as well as strongly convex hypothesis classes, which applies not only to MTL but also to the standard i.i.d. setting. Combining both results, one can now easily derive fast-rate bounds on the excess risk for many prominent MTL methods, including---as we demonstrate---Schatten-norm, group-norm, and graph-regularized MTL. The derived bounds reflect a relationship akeen to a conservation law of asymptotic convergence rates. This very relationship allows for trading off slower rates w.r.t. the number of tasks for faster rates with respect to the number of available samples per task, when compared to the rates obtained via a traditional, global Rademacher analysis.Comment: In this version, some arguments and results (of the previous version) have been corrected, or modifie
    corecore