sj-tif-1-cll-10.1177_09636897231210069 – Supplemental material for Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells Improve the Status of Hypoxic/Ischemic Cerebral Palsy Rats by Downregulating NogoA/NgR/Rho Pathway

Supplemental material, sj-tif-1-cll-10.1177_09636897231210069 for Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells Improve the Status of Hypoxic/Ischemic Cerebral Palsy Rats by Downregulating NogoA/NgR/Rho Pathway by Yaoling Luo, Jiayang Qu, Zhengyi He, Minhong Zhang, Zhengwei Zou, Lincai Li, Yuxian Zhang and Junsong Ye in Cell Transplantation</p

Additional file 1 of Efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stem cell therapy in liver cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Additional file 1. Figure S1: Forest plot of secondary indicators: (A): ALT levels (B): AST levels. (C): TBIL levels. (D): INR levels. Figure S2: Time subgroup of ALT levels. Figure S3: Time subgroup of AST levels. Figure S4: Time subgroup of TBIL levels

Presentation_1_Efficacy and Safety of Stem Cell Therapy in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.PDF

AimThere is insufficient evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy for autism spectrum disorders. We performed the first meta-analysis of stem cell therapy for autism spectrum disorders in children to provide evidence for clinical rehabilitation.MethodsThe data source includes PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and China Academic Journal, from inception to 24th JULY 2021. After sifting through the literature, the Cochrane tool was applied to assess the risk of bias. Finally, we extracted data from these studies and calculated pooled efficacy and safety.Results5 studies that met the inclusion criteria were included in current analysis. Meta-analysis was performed using rehabilitation therapy as the reference standard. Data showed that the Childhood Autism Rating Scale score of stem cell group was striking lower than the control group (WMD: −5.96; 95%CI [−8.87, −3.06]; p ConclusionsThe results of this meta-analysis suggested that stem cell therapy for children with autism might be safe and effective. However, the evidence was compromised by the limitations in current study size, lacking standardized injection routes and doses of stem cells, as well as shortages in diagnostic tools and long period follow-up studies. Hence, it calls for more studies to systematically confirm the efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy for children with autism spectrum disorders.</p

Novel Thermosensitive Hydrogel Promotes Spinal Cord Repair by Regulating Mitochondrial Function

The repair of spinal cord injury (SCI) is still a tough clinical challenge and needs innovative therapies. Mitochondrial function is significantly compromised after SCI and has emerged as an important factor causing neuronal apoptosis and hindering functional recovery. In this study, umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (UCMSC), which are promising seed cells for nerve regeneration, and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) that have been demonstrated to have a variety of effects on neural regeneration were jointly immobilized in extracellular matrix (ECM) and heparin-poloxamer (HP) to create a polymer bioactive system that brings more hope and possibility for the treatment of SCI. Our results in vitro and in vivo showed that the UCMSC-bFGF-ECM-HP thermosensitive hydrogel has good therapeutic effects, mainly in reducing apoptosis and improving the mitochondrial function. It showed promising utility for the functional recovery of impaired mitochondrial function by promoting mitochondrial fusion, reducing pathological mitochondrial fragmentation, increasing mitochondrial energy supply, and improving the metabolism of MDA, LDH, and ROS. In addition, we uncovered a distinct molecular mechanism underlying the protective effects associated with activating p21-activated kinase 1 (PAK1) and mitochondrial sirtuin 4 (SIRT4) by the UCMSC-bFGF-ECM-HP hydrogel. The expansion of new insights into the molecular relationships between PAK1 and SIRT4, which links the mitochondrial function in SCI, can lay the foundation for future applications and help to provide promising interventions of stem-cell-based biological scaffold therapies and potential therapeutic targets for the clinical formulation of SCI treatment strategies

Image2_Efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy in cerebral palsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.TIF

Aim: Although the efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy for cerebral palsy has been demonstrated in previous studies, the number of studies is limited and the treatment protocols of these studies lack consistency. Therefore, we included all relevant studies to date to explore factors that might influence the effectiveness of treatment based on the determination of safety and efficacy.Methods: The data source includes PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, from inception to 2 January 2022. Literature was screened according to the PICOS principle, followed by literature quality evaluation to assess the risk of bias. Finally, the outcome indicators of each study were extracted for combined analysis.Results: 9 studies were included in the current analysis. The results of the pooled analysis showed that the improvements in both primary and secondary indicators except for Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development were more skewed towards stem cell therapy than the control group. In the subgroup analysis, the results showed that stem cell therapy significantly increased Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) scores of 3, 6, and 12 months. Besides, improvements in GMFM scores were more skewed toward umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells, low dose, and intrathecal injection. Importantly, there was no significant difference in the adverse events (RR = 1.13; 95% CI = [0.90, 1.42]) between the stem cell group and the control group.Conclusion: The results suggested that stem cell therapy for cerebral palsy was safe and effective. Although the subgroup analysis results presented guiding significance in the selection of clinical protocols for stem cell therapy, high-quality RCTs validations are still needed.</p

DataSheet1_Efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy in cerebral palsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PDF

Aim: Although the efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy for cerebral palsy has been demonstrated in previous studies, the number of studies is limited and the treatment protocols of these studies lack consistency. Therefore, we included all relevant studies to date to explore factors that might influence the effectiveness of treatment based on the determination of safety and efficacy.Methods: The data source includes PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, from inception to 2 January 2022. Literature was screened according to the PICOS principle, followed by literature quality evaluation to assess the risk of bias. Finally, the outcome indicators of each study were extracted for combined analysis.Results: 9 studies were included in the current analysis. The results of the pooled analysis showed that the improvements in both primary and secondary indicators except for Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development were more skewed towards stem cell therapy than the control group. In the subgroup analysis, the results showed that stem cell therapy significantly increased Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) scores of 3, 6, and 12 months. Besides, improvements in GMFM scores were more skewed toward umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells, low dose, and intrathecal injection. Importantly, there was no significant difference in the adverse events (RR = 1.13; 95% CI = [0.90, 1.42]) between the stem cell group and the control group.Conclusion: The results suggested that stem cell therapy for cerebral palsy was safe and effective. Although the subgroup analysis results presented guiding significance in the selection of clinical protocols for stem cell therapy, high-quality RCTs validations are still needed.</p

Table1_Efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy in cerebral palsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.DOCX

Aim: Although the efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy for cerebral palsy has been demonstrated in previous studies, the number of studies is limited and the treatment protocols of these studies lack consistency. Therefore, we included all relevant studies to date to explore factors that might influence the effectiveness of treatment based on the determination of safety and efficacy.Methods: The data source includes PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, from inception to 2 January 2022. Literature was screened according to the PICOS principle, followed by literature quality evaluation to assess the risk of bias. Finally, the outcome indicators of each study were extracted for combined analysis.Results: 9 studies were included in the current analysis. The results of the pooled analysis showed that the improvements in both primary and secondary indicators except for Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development were more skewed towards stem cell therapy than the control group. In the subgroup analysis, the results showed that stem cell therapy significantly increased Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) scores of 3, 6, and 12 months. Besides, improvements in GMFM scores were more skewed toward umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells, low dose, and intrathecal injection. Importantly, there was no significant difference in the adverse events (RR = 1.13; 95% CI = [0.90, 1.42]) between the stem cell group and the control group.Conclusion: The results suggested that stem cell therapy for cerebral palsy was safe and effective. Although the subgroup analysis results presented guiding significance in the selection of clinical protocols for stem cell therapy, high-quality RCTs validations are still needed.</p

Table3_Efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy in cerebral palsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.XLS

Aim: Although the efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy for cerebral palsy has been demonstrated in previous studies, the number of studies is limited and the treatment protocols of these studies lack consistency. Therefore, we included all relevant studies to date to explore factors that might influence the effectiveness of treatment based on the determination of safety and efficacy.Methods: The data source includes PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, from inception to 2 January 2022. Literature was screened according to the PICOS principle, followed by literature quality evaluation to assess the risk of bias. Finally, the outcome indicators of each study were extracted for combined analysis.Results: 9 studies were included in the current analysis. The results of the pooled analysis showed that the improvements in both primary and secondary indicators except for Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development were more skewed towards stem cell therapy than the control group. In the subgroup analysis, the results showed that stem cell therapy significantly increased Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) scores of 3, 6, and 12 months. Besides, improvements in GMFM scores were more skewed toward umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells, low dose, and intrathecal injection. Importantly, there was no significant difference in the adverse events (RR = 1.13; 95% CI = [0.90, 1.42]) between the stem cell group and the control group.Conclusion: The results suggested that stem cell therapy for cerebral palsy was safe and effective. Although the subgroup analysis results presented guiding significance in the selection of clinical protocols for stem cell therapy, high-quality RCTs validations are still needed.</p

Image1_Efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy in cerebral palsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.TIF

Aim: Although the efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy for cerebral palsy has been demonstrated in previous studies, the number of studies is limited and the treatment protocols of these studies lack consistency. Therefore, we included all relevant studies to date to explore factors that might influence the effectiveness of treatment based on the determination of safety and efficacy.Methods: The data source includes PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, from inception to 2 January 2022. Literature was screened according to the PICOS principle, followed by literature quality evaluation to assess the risk of bias. Finally, the outcome indicators of each study were extracted for combined analysis.Results: 9 studies were included in the current analysis. The results of the pooled analysis showed that the improvements in both primary and secondary indicators except for Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development were more skewed towards stem cell therapy than the control group. In the subgroup analysis, the results showed that stem cell therapy significantly increased Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) scores of 3, 6, and 12 months. Besides, improvements in GMFM scores were more skewed toward umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells, low dose, and intrathecal injection. Importantly, there was no significant difference in the adverse events (RR = 1.13; 95% CI = [0.90, 1.42]) between the stem cell group and the control group.Conclusion: The results suggested that stem cell therapy for cerebral palsy was safe and effective. Although the subgroup analysis results presented guiding significance in the selection of clinical protocols for stem cell therapy, high-quality RCTs validations are still needed.</p

Table2_Efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy in cerebral palsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.XLS

Aim: Although the efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy for cerebral palsy has been demonstrated in previous studies, the number of studies is limited and the treatment protocols of these studies lack consistency. Therefore, we included all relevant studies to date to explore factors that might influence the effectiveness of treatment based on the determination of safety and efficacy.Methods: The data source includes PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, from inception to 2 January 2022. Literature was screened according to the PICOS principle, followed by literature quality evaluation to assess the risk of bias. Finally, the outcome indicators of each study were extracted for combined analysis.Results: 9 studies were included in the current analysis. The results of the pooled analysis showed that the improvements in both primary and secondary indicators except for Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development were more skewed towards stem cell therapy than the control group. In the subgroup analysis, the results showed that stem cell therapy significantly increased Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) scores of 3, 6, and 12 months. Besides, improvements in GMFM scores were more skewed toward umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells, low dose, and intrathecal injection. Importantly, there was no significant difference in the adverse events (RR = 1.13; 95% CI = [0.90, 1.42]) between the stem cell group and the control group.Conclusion: The results suggested that stem cell therapy for cerebral palsy was safe and effective. Although the subgroup analysis results presented guiding significance in the selection of clinical protocols for stem cell therapy, high-quality RCTs validations are still needed.</p