11 research outputs found

    Capsella_alignments.tar

    No full text
    Used alignements for the empirical application from Capsella. The sequences came from St Onge KR, Foxe JP, Li J et al. (2012, Molecular biology and evolution), Slotte T, Huang H, Lascoux M, Ceplitis A (2008, Molecular biology and evolution) and Foxe JP, Slotte T, Stahl EA et al. (2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America)

    Locations of each of the 10 sites used in this study.

    No full text
    <p>The arrow indicates the location of the study region in Spain. Grid lines indicate (decimal) degrees north and east.</p

    Variation in the frequency of females (grey bar segments), hermaphrodites (white bar segments), and males (black bar segments) at each high density (left panel) and low density (right panel) subsite.

    No full text
    <p>Subsites in each panel are ordered by the local frequency of females in the high-density subsites. Numbers at the top of each bar indicate the total sample size per subsite. Numbers at the bottom of each bar correspond with the site numbers in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0035597#pone-0035597-g001" target="_blank">Fig. 1</a>.</p

    Figure 5

    No full text
    <p>Parental and progeny sex ratios of females (squares), hermaphrodites (triangles), and males (circles) in high density treatments with males (A), without males (C), and low density treatments with males (B) and without males (D) (a small proportion of males were found in the low density with no males treatment, but this is not depicted). Results of the replicated goodness of fit tests from <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0035597#pone-0035597-t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a> (pooled for each density by male treatment combination) are shown in each panel (* <i>P</i><0.0001; <sup>NS </sup><i>P</i>>0.05).</p

    Frequency of males, hermaphrodites, and females among the progeny of plants grown under high- vs. low-density conditions and in the presence vs. absence of males.

    No full text
    <p>Shown are the relative pollen production of hermaphrodites versus males (<i>p</i><sub>h</sub>, where <i>p<sub>h</sub></i> = π<sub>h</sub>/π<sub>m</sub>), the relative seed production of hermaphrodites versus females (<i>o<sub>h</sub></i>, where <i>o<sub>h</sub></i> = σ<sub>h</sub>/σ<sub>f</sub>), the frequency of each sex in the next generation, and the sample size. <i>G</i> values are given for tests of independence of sex frequencies from the parental versus progeny generation for each plot. <i>G</i><sub>H</sub> refers to tests of heterogeneity between plots in the same treatment. <i>G</i><sub>P</sub> combines data from all plots, testing for overall changes in the frequency of the three sex phenotypes.</p>*<p><i>P</i><0.05;</p>**<p><i>P</i><0.01;</p>***<p><i>P</i><0.001.</p
    corecore