17 research outputs found
Synthesis and Catalytic Property of Iron Pincer Complexes Generated by C<sub>sp<sup>3</sup></sub>–H Activation
When
the diphosphinito PCP ligand (Ph<sub>2</sub>PÂ(C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>))<sub>2</sub>CH<sub>2</sub> (<b>1</b>) was treated
with FeÂ(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub> and FeMe<sub>2</sub>(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub>, the
C<sub>sp<sup>3</sup></sub>–H activation products [(Ph<sub>2</sub>PÂ(C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>))<sub>2</sub>CH]ÂFeÂ(H)Â(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> (<b>2</b>) and [(Ph<sub>2</sub>PÂ(C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>))Â(PhPÂ(C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>)ÂCH]ÂFeÂ(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> (<b>3</b>) were obtained at room temperature.
The generation of product <b>3</b> underwent one C<sub>sp<sup>3</sup></sub>–H and one C<sub>sp<sup>2</sup></sub>–H
bond activation process. The new iron hydride complex <b>2</b> showed good activity in the catalytic hydrosilylation of aldehydes
and ketones by using (EtO)<sub>3</sub>SiH as the hydrogen source under
mild conditions. Complexes <b>2</b> and <b>3</b> were
characterized by spectroscopic methods and X-ray diffraction analysis
Synthesis and Catalytic Property of Iron Pincer Complexes Generated by C<sub>sp<sup>3</sup></sub>–H Activation
When
the diphosphinito PCP ligand (Ph<sub>2</sub>PÂ(C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>))<sub>2</sub>CH<sub>2</sub> (<b>1</b>) was treated
with FeÂ(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub> and FeMe<sub>2</sub>(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub>, the
C<sub>sp<sup>3</sup></sub>–H activation products [(Ph<sub>2</sub>PÂ(C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>))<sub>2</sub>CH]ÂFeÂ(H)Â(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> (<b>2</b>) and [(Ph<sub>2</sub>PÂ(C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>))Â(PhPÂ(C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>)ÂCH]ÂFeÂ(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> (<b>3</b>) were obtained at room temperature.
The generation of product <b>3</b> underwent one C<sub>sp<sup>3</sup></sub>–H and one C<sub>sp<sup>2</sup></sub>–H
bond activation process. The new iron hydride complex <b>2</b> showed good activity in the catalytic hydrosilylation of aldehydes
and ketones by using (EtO)<sub>3</sub>SiH as the hydrogen source under
mild conditions. Complexes <b>2</b> and <b>3</b> were
characterized by spectroscopic methods and X-ray diffraction analysis
Imine Nitrogen Bridged Binuclear Nickel Complexes via N–H Bond Activation: Synthesis, Characterization, Unexpected C,N-Coupling Reaction, and Their Catalytic Application in Hydrosilylation of Aldehydes
The
reactions of NiMe<sub>2</sub>(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub> with
2,6-difluoroarylimines were explored. As a result, a series of binuclear
nickel complexes (<b>5</b>–<b>8</b>,<b> 11</b>) were synthesized. Meanwhile, from the reactions of NiMe<sub>2</sub>(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub> with [2-CH<sub>3</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>-CÂ(î—»NH)-2,6-F<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>] (<b>9</b>) and [2,6-(CH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>-CÂ(î—»NH)-2,6-F<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>] (<b>10</b>), two unexpected C,N-coupling products (<b>12</b> and <b>13</b>) were obtained. It is believed that
these coupling reactions underwent activation of the N–H and
C–F bonds. The binuclear nickel complexes showed excellent
catalytic activity in the hydrosilylation of aldehydes. The mechanism
of the reaction was studied through stoichiometric reactions, and
the double-(η<sup>2</sup>-Si–H)–Ni<sup>II</sup> intermediate was detected by in situ <sup>1</sup>H NMR spectroscopy,
which may be the key point in the catalytic cycle
Acid-Promoted Selective Carbon–Fluorine Bond Activation and Functionalization of Hexafluoropropene by Nickel Complexes Supported with Phosphine Ligands
The
electron-rich complex NiÂ(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub> was utilized
to react with perfluoropropene to obtain NiÂ(CF<sub>2</sub>î—»CFCF<sub>3</sub>)Â(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub> (<b>1</b>). The selective
C–F bond activation process of the π-coordinated perfluoropropene
in <b>1</b> was conducted with the promotion of Lewis acids
(ZnCl<sub>2</sub>, LiBr, and LiI) under mild conditions to afford
the products NiÂ(CF<sub>3</sub>Cî—»CF<sub>2</sub>)Â(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>X (X = Cl (<b>2</b>), Br (<b>3</b>), I (<b>4</b>)). The structures of complexes <b>2</b> and <b>3</b> determined by X-ray single-crystal diffraction confirmed
that the C–F bond activation occurred at the geminal position
of the trifluoromethyl group. Surprisingly, CF<sub>3</sub>COOH as
a protonic acid could also carry out a similar activation reaction
to give rise to NiÂ(CF<sub>3</sub>Cî—»CF<sub>2</sub>)Â(CF<sub>3</sub>COO)Â(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> (<b>7</b>), while only the
addition products NiÂ(CF<sub>2</sub>CFHCF<sub>3</sub>)Â(CH<sub>3</sub>COO)Â(PMe<sub>3</sub>) (<b>5</b>) and NiÂ(CF<sub>2</sub>CFHCF<sub>3</sub>)Â(CH<sub>3</sub>SO<sub>3</sub>)Â(PMe<sub>3</sub>) (<b>6</b>) were obtained with CH<sub>3</sub>COOH and CH<sub>3</sub>SO<sub>3</sub>H. The transmetalation products NiÂ(CF<sub>3</sub>Cî—»CF<sub>2</sub>)ÂPhÂ(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> (<b>8</b>), NiÂ(CF<sub>3</sub>Cî—»CF<sub>2</sub>)Â(<i>p</i>-MeOPh)Â(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> (<b>9</b>), and NiÂ(CF<sub>3</sub>Cî—»CF<sub>2</sub>)Â(Cî—¼CPh)Â(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> (<b>10</b>) were obtained through the reactions of NiÂ(CF<sub>3</sub>Cî—»CF<sub>2</sub>)Â(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>Cl (<b>2</b>) with PhMgBr,
(<i>p</i>-MeOPh)ÂMgBr, and PhCî—¼CLi. In contrast, the
reaction of complex <b>2</b> with PhCH<sub>2</sub>CH<sub>2</sub>MgBr delivered complex <b>11</b>, NiÂ(CF<sub>3</sub>CHî—»C–CH<sub>2</sub>CH<sub>2</sub>Ph)Â(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>, via double
C–F bond activation. All of the CÂ(sp<sup>2</sup>)–F
bonds in complex <b>11</b> were activated and cleaved. The structures
of complexes <b>5</b> and <b>7</b>–<b>11</b> were determined by X-ray single-crystal structure analysis. A reasonable
mechanism was proposed and partially experimentally verified through
operando IR and <i>in situ</i> <sup>1</sup>H NMR spectroscopy
Synthesis and Reactivity of a Hydrido CNC Pincer Cobalt(III) Complex and Its Application in Hydrosilylation of Aldehydes and Ketones
Reaction
of the <i>N</i>-benzylidene-1-naphthylamine
with CoMeÂ(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub> afforded the hydrido CNC pincer
cobalt complex CoHÂ(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>Â[(C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>)ÂCHî—»NÂ(C<sub>10</sub>H<sub>6</sub>)] (<b>1</b>) via double C–H bond activation. In the <sup>1</sup>H NMR
spectrum, a triplet at −18.98 ppm is the typical signal of
the hydrido ligand (Co–H). Complex <b>1</b> reacted with
haloalkane (CH<sub>3</sub>I and EtBr) to deliver CoXÂ(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>((C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>)ÂCHî—»NÂ(C<sub>10</sub>H<sub>6</sub>)) (X = I (<b>2</b>); Br (<b>3</b>)). However,
the reactions of complex <b>1</b> with HCl and trifluoroacetic
acid (TFA) delivered HCoClÂ(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>((C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>)ÂCHî—»NÂ(C<sub>10</sub>H<sub>7</sub>)) (<b>4</b>) and HCoÂ(OCOCF<sub>3</sub>)Â(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>Â((C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>)ÂCHî—»NÂ(C<sub>10</sub>H<sub>7</sub>)) (<b>5</b>) with the cleavage of the Co–CÂ(naphthyl) bond. In
the <sup>1</sup>H NMR spectra, the signals of the hydrido ligands
were found at −21.31 (<b>4</b>) and −18.71 (<b>5</b>) ppm. A reaction of complex <b>1</b> with DCl was
carried out to prove that the hydrogen atom eliminated to the naphthyl
carbon comes from HCl. Complex <b>1</b> reacted with acetylacetone,
resulting in the formation of CoÂ(acac)Â(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>Â((C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>5</sub>)ÂCHNHÂ(C<sub>10</sub>H<sub>6</sub>)) (<b>7</b>). Complex <b>1</b> was found to be an efficient
catalyst for hydrosilylation of aldehydes and ketones. The molecular
structures of complex <b>1</b>, <b>2</b>, <b>4</b>, and <b>7</b> were determined by X-ray single-crystal diffraction
Acid-Promoted Selective Carbon–Fluorine Bond Activation and Functionalization of Hexafluoropropene by Nickel Complexes Supported with Phosphine Ligands
The
electron-rich complex NiÂ(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub> was utilized
to react with perfluoropropene to obtain NiÂ(CF<sub>2</sub>î—»CFCF<sub>3</sub>)Â(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub> (<b>1</b>). The selective
C–F bond activation process of the π-coordinated perfluoropropene
in <b>1</b> was conducted with the promotion of Lewis acids
(ZnCl<sub>2</sub>, LiBr, and LiI) under mild conditions to afford
the products NiÂ(CF<sub>3</sub>Cî—»CF<sub>2</sub>)Â(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>X (X = Cl (<b>2</b>), Br (<b>3</b>), I (<b>4</b>)). The structures of complexes <b>2</b> and <b>3</b> determined by X-ray single-crystal diffraction confirmed
that the C–F bond activation occurred at the geminal position
of the trifluoromethyl group. Surprisingly, CF<sub>3</sub>COOH as
a protonic acid could also carry out a similar activation reaction
to give rise to NiÂ(CF<sub>3</sub>Cî—»CF<sub>2</sub>)Â(CF<sub>3</sub>COO)Â(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> (<b>7</b>), while only the
addition products NiÂ(CF<sub>2</sub>CFHCF<sub>3</sub>)Â(CH<sub>3</sub>COO)Â(PMe<sub>3</sub>) (<b>5</b>) and NiÂ(CF<sub>2</sub>CFHCF<sub>3</sub>)Â(CH<sub>3</sub>SO<sub>3</sub>)Â(PMe<sub>3</sub>) (<b>6</b>) were obtained with CH<sub>3</sub>COOH and CH<sub>3</sub>SO<sub>3</sub>H. The transmetalation products NiÂ(CF<sub>3</sub>Cî—»CF<sub>2</sub>)ÂPhÂ(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> (<b>8</b>), NiÂ(CF<sub>3</sub>Cî—»CF<sub>2</sub>)Â(<i>p</i>-MeOPh)Â(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> (<b>9</b>), and NiÂ(CF<sub>3</sub>Cî—»CF<sub>2</sub>)Â(Cî—¼CPh)Â(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> (<b>10</b>) were obtained through the reactions of NiÂ(CF<sub>3</sub>Cî—»CF<sub>2</sub>)Â(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>Cl (<b>2</b>) with PhMgBr,
(<i>p</i>-MeOPh)ÂMgBr, and PhCî—¼CLi. In contrast, the
reaction of complex <b>2</b> with PhCH<sub>2</sub>CH<sub>2</sub>MgBr delivered complex <b>11</b>, NiÂ(CF<sub>3</sub>CHî—»C–CH<sub>2</sub>CH<sub>2</sub>Ph)Â(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>, via double
C–F bond activation. All of the CÂ(sp<sup>2</sup>)–F
bonds in complex <b>11</b> were activated and cleaved. The structures
of complexes <b>5</b> and <b>7</b>–<b>11</b> were determined by X-ray single-crystal structure analysis. A reasonable
mechanism was proposed and partially experimentally verified through
operando IR and <i>in situ</i> <sup>1</sup>H NMR spectroscopy
Transition-Metal-Free Synthesis of Fluorinated Arenes from Perfluorinated Arenes Coupled with Grignard Reagents
A simple
method to obtain organofluorine compounds from perfluorinated
arenes coupled with Grignard reagents in the absence of a transition-metal
catalyst was reported. In particular, the perfluorinated arenes could
react not only with aryl Grignard reagents but also with alkyl Grignard
reagents in moderate to good yields
Synthesis and Reactivity of N‑Heterocyclic PSiP Pincer Iron and Cobalt Complexes and Catalytic Application of Cobalt Hydride in Kumada Coupling Reactions
The new N-heterocyclic σ-silyl
pincer ligand HSiMeÂ(NCH<sub>2</sub>PPh<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub> (<b>1</b>) was designed. A series of tridentate
silyl pincer Fe and Co complexes were prepared. Most of them were
formed by chelate-assisted Si–H activation. The typical iron
hydrido complex FeHÂ(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>(SiMeÂ(NCH<sub>2</sub>PPh<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>) (<b>2</b>) was obtained by Si–H activation of compound <b>1</b> with FeÂ(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub>. The combination of compound <b>1</b> with CoMeÂ(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub> afforded the CoÂ(I)
complex CoÂ(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>(SiMeÂ(NCH<sub>2</sub>PPh<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>) (<b>3</b>).
The CoÂ(III) complex CoHClÂ(PMe<sub>3</sub>)Â(SiMeÂ(NCH<sub>2</sub>PPh<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>) (<b>5</b>)
was generated by the reaction of complex <b>1</b> with CoClÂ(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub> or the combination of complex <b>3</b> with HCl. However, when complex <b>3</b> was treated with
MeI, the CoÂ(II) complex CoIÂ(PMe<sub>3</sub>)Â(SiMeÂ(NCH<sub>2</sub>PPh<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>) (<b>4</b>),
rather than the CoÂ(III) complex, was isolated. The catalytic performance
of complex <b>5</b> for Kumada coupling reactions was explored.
With a catalyst loading of 5 mol %, complex <b>5</b> displayed
efficient catalytic activity for Kumada cross-coupling reactions of
aryl chlorides and aryl bromides with Grignard reagents. This catalytic
reaction mechanism is proposed and partially experimentally verified
Delay guaranteed joint user association and channel allocation for fog radio access networks
IEEE In the Fog Radio Access Networks (F-RANs), the local storage and computing capability of Fog Access Points (FAPs) provide new communication resources to address the latency and computing constraints for delay-sensitive applications. To achieve the ultra-low latency, a novel joint user association and channel allocation scheme is proposed in this paper, where the FAPs are clustered from a user-centric perspective. The delay performance is improved regarding both the control signaling procedure and the data transmission procedure. Specifically, the multiple access interference (MAI) between users is analyzed, where the closed-form expression for the effective rate of a typical user with multiple FAP connections and arbitrary interfering users is obtained. With the consideration of MAI, the proposed distributed joint user association and channel allocation algorithm provides a guaranteed delay violation probability. Moreover, the distributed algorithm can be conducted on individual FAPs, whose calculation is simplified by look-up tables. Simulation results show that the proposed algorithm is capable of providing statistical delay performance guarantee including both average delay and delay bound violation probability, which demonstrates its superiority in supporting delay-sensitive applications in F-RANs
Vinyl/Phenyl Exchange Reaction within Vinyl Nickel Complexes Bearing Chelate [P, S]-Ligands
Three nickelÂ(II)
hydrides, [2-Ph<sub>2</sub>PÂ(4-Me-C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>)ÂS]ÂNiHÂ(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> (<b>1</b>),
[2-Ph<sub>2</sub>PÂ(6-Me<sub>3</sub>Si-C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>)ÂS]ÂNiHÂ(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> (<b>2</b>), and [2-Ph<sub>2</sub>PÂ(4-Me<sub>3</sub>Si -C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>)ÂS]ÂNiHÂ(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> (<b>3</b>), were synthesized via S–H bond activation
through the reaction of NiÂ(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub> with (2-diphenylphosphanyl)Âthiophenols.
The reactions of nickelÂ(II) hydrides (<b>1</b>–<b>3</b>) with different alkynes were investigated. Although the
first step is the insertion of alkyne into the Ni–H bond for
each reaction, different final products were isolated. Normal vinyl
nickel complex [2-Ph<sub>2</sub>PÂ(4-Me-C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>)ÂS]ÂNiÂ(CPhî—»CH<sub>2</sub>)Â(PMe<sub>3</sub>) (<b>4</b>) was obtained by the reaction
of phenylacetylene with <b>1</b>. The nickelacyclopropane complexes
[2-Ph<sub>2</sub>PÂ(6-Me<sub>3</sub>Si-C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>)ÂS]ÂNiÂ[PhÂ(PMe<sub>3</sub>)ÂC–CH<sub>2</sub>] (<b>5</b>), [2-Ph<sub>2</sub>PÂ(4-Me<sub>3</sub>Si-C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>)ÂS]ÂNiÂ[PhÂ(PMe<sub>3</sub>)ÂC–CH<sub>2</sub>] (<b>6</b>), [2-Ph<sub>2</sub>PÂ(4-Me<sub>3</sub>-C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>)ÂS]ÂNiÂ[PhÂ(PMe<sub>3</sub>)ÂC–CHPh]
(<b>7</b>), [2-Ph<sub>2</sub>PÂ(6-Me<sub>3</sub>Si-C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>)ÂS]ÂNiÂ[PhÂ(PMe<sub>3</sub>)ÂC–CHPh] (<b>8</b>), [2-Ph<sub>2</sub>PÂ(4-Me<sub>3</sub>Si-C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>)ÂS]ÂNiÂ[PhÂ(PMe<sub>3</sub>)ÂC–CHPh] (<b>9</b>), [2-Ph<sub>2</sub>PÂ(4-Me-C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>)ÂS]ÂNiÂ[PhÂ(PMe<sub>3</sub>)ÂC–CHSiMe<sub>3</sub>] (<b>10</b>) or [2-Ph<sub>2</sub>PÂ(4-Me-C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>)ÂS]ÂNiÂ[Me<sub>3</sub>SiÂ(PMe<sub>3</sub>)ÂC–CHPh]
(<b>10</b>), [2-Ph<sub>2</sub>PÂ(6-Me<sub>3</sub>Si-C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>)ÂS]ÂNiÂ[PhÂ(PMe<sub>3</sub>)ÂC–CHSiMe<sub>3</sub>] (<b>11</b>) or [2-Ph<sub>2</sub>PÂ(6-Me<sub>3</sub>Si-C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>)ÂS]ÂNiÂ[Me<sub>3</sub>SiÂ(PMe<sub>3</sub>)ÂC–CHPh]
(<b>11</b>), and [2-Ph<sub>2</sub>PÂ(4-Me<sub>3</sub>Si-C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>)ÂS]ÂNiÂ[PhÂ(PMe<sub>3</sub>)ÂC–CHSiMe<sub>3</sub>] (<b>12</b>) or [2-Ph<sub>2</sub>PÂ(4-Me<sub>3</sub>Si-C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>)ÂS]ÂNiÂ[Me<sub>3</sub>SiÂ(PMe<sub>3</sub>)ÂC–CHPh] (<b>12</b>) containing a ylidic ligand were
formed by the reaction of phenylacetylene, diphenylacetylene, and
1-phenyl-2-(trimethylsilyl)Âacetylene with <b>1</b>, <b>2</b>, and <b>3</b>, respectively. The phenyl/vinyl exchange nickelÂ(II)
complexes [2-(PhÂ(CH<sub>2</sub>î—»CSiMe<sub>3</sub>)ÂPÂ(4-Me-C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>)ÂS]ÂNiÂ(Ph)Â(PMe<sub>3</sub>) (<b>13</b>),
[2-(PhÂ(CH<sub>2</sub>î—»CSiMe<sub>3</sub>)ÂPÂ((6-Me<sub>3</sub>Si-C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>)ÂS]ÂNiÂ(Ph)Â(PMe<sub>3</sub>) (<b>14</b>), and [2-(PhÂ(CH<sub>2</sub>î—»CSiMe<sub>3</sub>)ÂPÂ((4-Me<sub>3</sub>Si-C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>)ÂS]ÂNiÂ(Ph)Â(PMe<sub>3</sub>) (<b>15</b>) could be obtained by insertion of trimethylsilylacetylene
into Ni–H bonds of <b>1</b>, <b>2</b>, and <b>3</b>. To the best of our knowledge, this is a novel reaction
type between alkyne and nickel hydride. The results indicate that
whether increasing the electronegativity on the benzene ring or on
the alkyne leads to the instability of the vinyl nickel complex, and
is beneficial to the C–P reductive elimination to form nickelacyclopropane
complexes or phenyl nickel complexes via vinyl/phenyl exchange reaction
in the case of the more electronegative nickel center. All the nickel
complexes were fully detected by IR, NMR and the molecular structures
of complexes <b>1</b>, <b>2</b>, <b>7</b>, <b>9</b>, <b>13</b>, and <b>14</b> were confirmed by
single crystal X-ray diffraction