32 research outputs found

    Home-range sizes of resident coyotes regressed against the percentages of agricultural habitats within home ranges (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.39, <i>P</i> < 0.001).

    No full text
    <p>Home-range sizes of resident coyotes regressed against the percentages of agricultural habitats within home ranges (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.39, <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p

    Habitat availability and habitat proportions of space used by resident and transient coyotes in northeastern North Carolina during 2009–2011.

    No full text
    <p>Asterisks above the bars represent statistical differences among areas within habitat classes (<i>P</i> < 0.05, Tukey’s test). Study area proportions are shown for reference.</p

    Map of the Albemarle Peninsula of northeastern North Carolina with primary habitat types during 2009–2011.

    No full text
    <p>Map of the Albemarle Peninsula of northeastern North Carolina with primary habitat types during 2009–2011.</p

    Relative probability of 3<sup>rd</sup>-order habitat selection by transient coyotes across the Albemarle Peninsula in northeastern North Carolina during 2009–2011.

    No full text
    <p>Relative probability of 3<sup>rd</sup>-order habitat selection by transient coyotes across the Albemarle Peninsula in northeastern North Carolina during 2009–2011.</p

    Mean (± SE) body mass, age, and space use of resident and transient coyotes in northeastern North Carolina during 2009–2011.

    No full text
    <p><sup>1</sup>Growing season space use was defined as areas used during March through August.</p><p><sup>2</sup>Harvest season space use was defined as areas used during September through February.</p><p><sup>3</sup>Composite space use was defined as the total area used.</p><p><sup>4</sup>95% probability contour calculated from dynamic Brownian bridge movement models used to estimate the sizes of resident home ranges and transient ranges.</p><p><sup>5</sup>50% probability contour calculated from dynamic Brownian bridge movement models used to estimate the sizes of resident core areas and transient biding areas.</p><p>Mean (± SE) body mass, age, and space use of resident and transient coyotes in northeastern North Carolina during 2009–2011.</p

    Relative probability of 3<sup>rd</sup>-order habitat selection by resident coyotes across the Albemarle Peninsula in northeastern North Carolina during 2009–2011.

    No full text
    <p>Relative probability of 3<sup>rd</sup>-order habitat selection by resident coyotes across the Albemarle Peninsula in northeastern North Carolina during 2009–2011.</p

    Transient locations and estimated home ranges of coyotes 505M and 613M in eastern North Carolina.

    No full text
    <p>Coyote 505M was monitored as a transient from 16 April 2009 until 31 May 2009. Coyote 505M established a territory approximately 1 June 2009 and maintained it until 27 October 2009 when he was displaced by a neighboring red wolf pack. Coyote 613M was monitored as a transient from 7 January 2011 until 4 April 2011. Coyote 613M established a territory approximately 5 April 2011 after the resident red wolf pack dissolved after the death of a breeder. Coyote 613M was monitored as a resident from 5 April 2011 until 16 August 2012 when his GPS collar failed.</p

    Locations of mammalian carnivore surveys and kernel density surface of Getis-Ord Gi* <i>z</i> scores of weighted ranking of IUCN red list categories for recorded species locations in Peninsular Malaysia, 1948–2014.

    No full text
    <p>Hillshade layer derived from Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (STRM) 90-m Digital Elevation Data from Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) and reprinted under a CC BY license, with permission from International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), original copyright 2004. Protected areas mentioned in the text are labeled; reprinted from World Database on Protected Areas (http://<a href="http://www.protectedplanet.net/" target="_blank">www.protectedplanet.net</a>) under a CC BY license, with permission from the United Nations Environmental Programme-World Conservation Monitoring Centre, original copyright 2010.</p

    Kamath et al_Yellowstone grizzly bear input files

    No full text
    Input files used to evaluate grizzly bear recent trends in diversity, generation interval and effective population size

    Number of records of Carnivora species in Peninsular Malaysia.

    No full text
    <p>Data were obtained from surveys that used conventional trapping, direct observation, sign, remote cameras, or road kills collected during 1991–2014. Species are grouped by family and ranked by number of records.</p
    corecore