34 research outputs found

    HIV-1 Vpr Abrogates the Effect of TSG101 Overexpression to Support Virus Release

    No full text
    <div><p>HIV-1 budding requires interaction between Gag and cellular TSG101 to initiate viral particle assembly and release via the endosomal sorting complexes required for transport (ESCRT) pathway. However, some reports show that overexpression of TSG101 inhibits virus release by disruption of Gag targeting process. Since a HIV-1 accessory protein, Vpr binds to Gag p6 domain at the position close to the binding site for TSG101, whether Vpr implicates TSG101 overexpression effect has not been investigated. Here, we found that Vpr abrogates TSG101 overexpression effect to rescue viral production. Co-transfection of TSG101 and Gag with Vpr prevented TSG101-induced Gag accumulation in endosomes and lysosomes. In addition, Vpr rescued virus-like particle (VLP) production in a similar manner as a lysosomal inhibitor, Bafilomycin A1 indicating that Vpr inhibits TSG101-induced Gag downregulation via lysosomal pathway. Vpr and Gag interaction is required to counteract TSG101 overexpression effect since Vpr A30F mutant which is unable to interact with Gag and incorporate into virions, reduced ability to prevent Gag accumulation and to rescue VLP production. In addition, GST pull-down assays and Biacore analysis revealed that Vpr competed with TSG101 for Gag binding. These results indicate that Vpr overcomes the effects of TSG101 overexpression to support viral production by competing with TSG101 to bind Gag.</p></div

    Vpr competes with TSG101 for binding to Gag.

    No full text
    <p>(A) GST or GST-Gag protein were immobilized on Glutathione Sepharose beads prior to overnight incubation with purified FLAG-TSG101 protein in the absence/presence of 48.3 μg/ml of PTAP short peptide (a positive control which targets the UEV domain of TSG101), 48.3 μg/ml of BSA (negative control), or 2.0 or 4.0 μg/ml of purified HA-Vpr protein. The beads were pulled-down, washed, and subjected to western blotting with anti-FLAG and anti-GST antibodies. The bottom panel represents mean ± SD intensity values of Gag-bound TSG101 from western blot analysis of four independent performs. *, P < 0.05 (unpaired t-test). (B) GST-Gag was co-incubated with purified FLAG-TSG101 and 48.3 μg/ml of PTAP short peptide or 2 μg/ml of HA-Vpr protein (competitive incubation, c.i.), or allowed to bind with PTAP short peptide or HA-Vpr protein for 3 h before co-incubation with FLAG-TSG101 protein (pre-incubation, p.i.). After overnight incubation, the beads were pulled-down, washed, and subjected to western blotting with anti-FLAG and anti-GST antibodies. The bottom panel represents intensity of Gag-bound TSG101 from western blot analysis of two independent performs. (C-D) GST-Gag protein was immobilized on Biacore sensor chip CM5 and the surface was injected with purified FLAG-TSG101 or FLAG-Vpr protein at different concentrations by Biacore T100 instrument. Kinetic sensorgrams of Gag-bound TSG101 at 0, 15.6, 31.3, 62.5, and 500.0 nM (C, left panel) and Gag-bound Vpr at 0, 15.6, 31.3, 62.5, 125.0, and 250.0 nM (C, right panel) are showed. (D) Steady stage affinity fitting curves of Gag/TSG101 (left panel) and Gag/Vpr (right panel) binding at equilibrium (4 s before injection stop). Black and red vertical lines represent equilibrium dissociation constant (KD) of Gag/TSG101 and Gag/Vpr binding affinity, representatively. Data represents the result of one representative experiment from two independent performs.</p

    Vpr rescues VLP production by inhibition of TSG101-induced Gag degradation via lysosomal pathway.

    No full text
    (A) HEK293T cells were transfected with 0.8 μg of pCAGGS/Gag, or with 0.8 μg of pCAGGS/Gag plus 1.5 μg of pCAGGS/FLAG-TSG101 either without/with different amounts of pCAGGS/Vpr for 48 h. VLPs in the cultured medium were collected by a 20% sucrose cushion. Whole cell lysates were prepared and samples were subjected to western blot analysis with anti-Gag, anti-Vpr, anti-FLAG, and anti-β-actin antibodies. The bottom panel represents intensity of VLP Gag from western blot analysis. Data represent the result of one representative experiment from three independent performs. (B-C) HEK293T cells were transfected with 0.8 μg of pCAGGS/Gag, or with 0.8 μg of pCAGGS/Gag and 1.5 μg of pCAGGS/FLAG-TSG101, for 24 h, before addition of Bafilomycin A1 (B) or Clasto-lactacystin β-lactone (C), followed by further culture for 16 h. VLPs and whole cell lysates were prepared and subjected to western blot analysis with anti-Gag, anti-Vpr, anti-FLAG, and anti-β-actin antibodies. Data represent the result of one representative experiment from two independent performs. (D) HeLa cells were transfected with 0.8 μg of pCAGGS/Gag-Venus, or with 0.8 μg of pCAGGS/Gag-Venus plus 1.5 μg of pCAGGS/eCFP-TSG101, for 48 h, followed by immunofluorescence staining anti-LAMP1, anti-EEA1, anti-Rab7, or anti-Rab11 antibody with a secondary antibody, Alexa Fluor 594 goat anti-rabbit antibody. Co-localization of Gag/LAMP1, Gag/EEA1, Gag/Rab7, or Gag/Rab11 was analyzed by Pearson’s correlation coefficients. Data represent means ± SD of the result of one representative experiment. *, P < 0.05 (unpaired t-test).</p

    Antiviral activity of bovine BST-2s against VSV.

    No full text
    <p>Expression plasmid for bBST-2A1, bBST-2A2, bBST-2B or hBST-2 was transfected into MDCK cells by electroporation. (A) Cells were dissolved at 16 h after transfection and then subjected to 12.5% SDS-PAGE. Intracellular expression of BST-2s was confirmed by Western blotting using anti-FLAG antibody. (B) At 24 h after transfection, cells were infected with VSV at MOI of 0.001. At 12 h after infection, culture supernatants were collected and virus production was determined by plaque assay. The experiments were conducted in triplicate, and the data are shown as the means ± standard deviation.</p

    Multiple alignment of bBST-2A1, bBST-2A2 and the corresponding regions in the bovine genome.

    No full text
    <p>The coloured boxes of bBST-2A1 and bBST-2A2 indicate nucleotide differences. The coloured boxes in the genomic sequences (GenBank, GCA_000003055.3) show the exon structures. The numbers at the top or bottom of the alignment indicate the relative positions or the absolute genomic positions on chromosome 7, respectively.</p

    Posttranslational modifications for bovine BST-2s.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Expression plasmid for FLAG-tagged bBST-2A1, bBST-2A2 or bBST-2B was transfected into HEK 293T cells. Cells were dissolved 24 h after transfection and subjected to 12.5% SDS-PAGE. Western blotting was performed with anti-FLAG or anti-Actin antibody. (B) Bovine BST-2s expressed in HEK 293T cells were treated with (+) or without (−)PNGase F for de-<i>N</i>-glycosylated reaction, and then subjected to 12.5% SDS-PAGE. Reaction conditions with PNGase F were as described in the Materials and Methods. BST-2 was detected with anti-FLAG antibody by Western blotting analysis.</p

    Vpr rescues the TSG101-mediated inhibition of viral particle release.

    No full text
    <p>(A) HeLa cells were transfected with 0.3 μg of pNL43 Luc E<sup>-</sup> R<sup>+</sup> (Vpr<sup>+</sup>) or pNL43 Luc E<sup>-</sup> R<sup>-</sup> (Vpr<sup>-</sup>) either without/with 0.1 μg of pCAGGS/mRFP-TSG101 and 0.1 μg of pcDNA/YFP-Vpr for 16 h prior to immunofluorescence staining with an anti-Gag AG3.0 antibody followed by a FITC-conjugated sheep anti-mouse antibody. White arrows indicate Gag/TSG101 co-localized on/near the plasma membrane observed by total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy. Data represents the result of one representative experiment from two independent performs. (B-C) HEK293T cells were transfected with 0.2 μg of pNL43 Luc E<sup>-</sup> R<sup>+</sup> (Vpr<sup>+</sup>) (B) or pNL43 Luc E<sup>-</sup> R<sup>-</sup> (Vpr<sup>-</sup>) (C), together with 1 μg of pCAGGS/FLAG-TSG101 and different amounts of pCAGGS/Vpr for 48 h. Viral particles in the culture medium were collected by PEG precipitation. Whole cell lysates were prepared and samples were subjected to western blotting with anti-Gag, anti-Vpr, anti-FLAG, and anti-β-actin antibodies. Data represents the result of one representative experiment from two independent performs.</p

    Vpr and Gag interaction is required to abrogate the effect of TSG101 overexpression.

    No full text
    <p>(A) HeLa cells were co-transfected with 0.8 μg of pCAGGS/Gag and 1.5 μg of pCAGGS/eCFP-TSG101 either without/with 0.5 μg of pCAGGS/HA-Vpr or pCAGGS/HA-Vpr A30F for 48 h prior to immunofluorescence staining with an anti-Gag and anti-HA antibodies, followed by an Alexa Fluor 594 goat anti-rabbit antibody and an Alexa Fluor 633 goat anti-mouse antibody. Co-localization of Gag/TSG101 was analyzed by Pearson’s correlation coefficients (B). Data represent the means ± SD of the result of two independent experiments. *, P < 0.05 (unpaired t-test). (C) HEK293T cells were transfected with 0.8 μg of pCAGGS/Gag, or with 0.8 μg of pCAGGS/Gag plus 1.5 μg of pCAGGS/FLAG-TSG101 either without/with different amounts of pCAGGS/Vpr A30F or 0.08 μg of pCAGGS/Vpr (positive control). After 48 h, VLPs in the cultured medium were collected by a 20% sucrose cushion. Whole cell lysates were prepared and samples were subjected to western blot analysis with anti-Gag, anti-Vpr, anti-FLAG, and anti-β-actin antibodies. The bottom panel represents intensity of VLP Gag from western blot analysis. Data represent the result of one representative experiment from two independent performs.</p

    Subcellular localization of bovine BST-2s.

    No full text
    <p>FLAG-tagged bBST-2s expressed in MDBK cells (left two lines) and HeLa cells (right two lines) were stained with FITC-conjugated anti-FLAG antibody (showed green) and then observed by fluorescence microscopy. Nuclei stained with DAPI are shown in blue the merged panels.</p

    Fluorescent Image Analysis of HIV-1 and HIV-2 Uncoating Kinetics in the Presence of Old World Monkey TRIM5α

    No full text
    <div><p>Uncoating of Human Immunodeficiency Virus type 1 (HIV-1) and type 2 (HIV-2) conical cores is an important early step for establishment of infection. In Old World Monkey (OWM) cells, the TRIM5α cellular factor potently suppresses an early step of infection by HIV-1. Previously, biochemical studies using whole cell lysates of infected cells revealed that OWM TRIM5α accelerates the uncoating of HIV-1, leading to premature reverse transcription. In the present study, we re-evaluated uncoating kinetics of HIV-1 in the presence of OWM TRIM5α by using an <i>in situ</i> uncoating assay, which allowed us to differentiate productive HIV-1 entry from simple (non-productive) endocytosis. Results showed that the uncoating kinetics of HIV-1 was indeed accelerated in the presence of OWM TRIM5α. Furthermore, we adapted an <i>in situ</i> uncoating assay to HIV-2, which showed wide variations in TRIM5α sensitivity among different isolates. HIV-2 isolate GH123, whose infectivity was suppressed by cynomolgus monkey (CM) TRIM5α, showed accelerated uncoating in the presence of CM TRIM5α. In contrast, mutant HIV-2 ASA, whose infectivity was unaltered by CM TRIM5α, showed no change in uncoating kinetics in the presence of CM TRIM5α. These results confirmed and further extended the previous notion that accelerated uncoating is associated with restriction activity of TRIM5α against lentiviruses.</p></div
    corecore