Metabolic Dysfunction and Dietary Interventions in Migraine Management: The Role of Insulin Resistance and Neuroinflammation—A Narrative and Scoping Review

Introduction: Migraine is a prevalent neurological disorder characterized by recurrent headaches with autonomic and neurological symptoms, significantly impacting quality of life globally. Its pathogenesis involves genetic, neurological, inflammatory, and metabolic factors, with insulin resistance and metabolic dysfunction increasingly recognized as important contributors. Historically, it has been known that certain foods can trigger migraine attacks, which led for many years to the recommendation of elimination diets—now understood to primarily target histamine-rich foods. Over the past two decades, attention has shifted toward underlying metabolic disturbances, leading to the development of dietary approaches specifically aimed at addressing these dysfunctions. Methods: A scoping literature review was conducted using PubMed and Embase to evaluate the relationships among migraine, insulin-related mechanisms, neurogenic inflammation, and dietary interventions. Initial searches focused on “MIGRAINE AND (neurogenic inflammation)” (2019–15 April 2025), followed by expanded searches from 1950 onward using terms such as “MIGRAINE AND (insulin, insulin resistance, hyperinsulinism)”, and “MIGRAINE AND (diet, dietary, nutrition, nutritional)”. A specific search also targeted “(INSULIN OR insulin resistance OR hyperinsulinism) AND (neurogenic inflammation)”. Abstracts were screened, full texts were retrieved, and duplicates or irrelevant publications were excluded. No filters were applied by article type or language. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were prioritized when available. Results: Migraine pathogenesis involves trigeminovascular system activation, neurogenic inflammation mediated by CGRP and PACAP, immune dysregulation, mast cell activation, and cortical spreading depression (CSD). Emerging evidence highlights significant associations between migraine, insulin resistance, and hyperinsulinism. Hyperinsulinism contributes to migraine through TRPV1 sensitization, increased CGRP release, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and systemic inflammation. Metabolic dysfunction, including obesity and insulin resistance, exacerbates migraine severity and frequency. Dietary interventions, particularly anti-inflammatory, Mediterranean, and ketogenic diets, show promise in reducing migraine frequency and severity through mechanisms involving reduced inflammation, oxidative stress, improved mitochondrial function, and glucose metabolism stabilization. Conclusions: The interplay between insulin resistance, metabolic dysfunction, and neuroinflammation is crucial in migraine pathophysiology. Targeted dietary interventions, including ketogenic and Mediterranean diets, demonstrate significant potential in managing migraines, emphasizing the need for personalized nutritional strategies to optimize therapeutic outcomes

Migraine in Systemic Autoimmune Diseases

Background and Objective: Migraine and systemic autoimmune diseases are 2-3-fold more common in women and various studies have reported an association between the two pathologies. Methods: This review takes into account epidemiological studies involving migraine and systemic lupus erythematosus, antiphospholipid syndrome, Sjogren's syndrome, and other diffuse connective tissue diseases. This scientific literature analysis consists of the main articles found in Medline with a search up to April 2017. Results: Many epidemiological studies were carried out on patients suffering from systemic lupus erythematosus. Results showed that headache and migraine are more prevalent in systemic lupus erythematosus patients compared to controls, especially migraine with aura. Patients with Lupus and migraine show a higher lupus activity and association with Raynaud and/or antiphospholipids in these populations are contradictory. There are not enough data to establish an association between antiphospholipid syndrome and migraine. However, data are more consistent between antiphospholipid carrier condition and migraine. Systemic sclerosis is a rare disease, for this reason the amount of available data on this disorder are scanty. However, some studies reported an association between headache, migraine and systemic sclerosis, especially where gliotic brain lesions and Raynaud are coexisting. Finally, large propensity cohort population based studies suggested that systemic autoimmune diseases are more frequent in patients suffering from migraine. Conclusion: An attempt at explaining the possible link between these disorders and migraine is discussed at the end of the review. Several autoimmune alterations are shared by most autoimmune diseases and headache types. Endothelial dysfunction is the only alteration that is common among all these disorders

Coexistence of antiphospholipid antibodies and cephalalgia

BackgroundThe occurrence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) and headache comorbidity in the presence or absence of underlying autoimmune diseases remains unclear.AimThe aim of this review was to summarize the relationship between headache and aPLs based on evidences from cohort studies and case reports, in addition to examining the treatment strategies that resolved headache in aPLs-positive individuals.MethodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted through PubMed, ISI Web of Science and Google Scholar. A total of 559 articles were screened and the appropriate articles were selected based on quality and level of evidence.ResultsCohort studies (n = 27) from Europe, North America and Asia demonstrated comorbidity of aPLs and headache in antiphospholipid syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and neuropsychiatric SLE patients. Significantly higher association between migraine and aPLs was observed (n = 170/779; p &lt; 0.0001) in individuals without any underlying diseases. Our analysis of shortlisted case reports (n = 17) showed that a higher frequency of anticardiolipin antibodies were present in subjects with different autoimmune disorders (70.6%). Corticosteroids were highly effective in resolving headache in aPLs-positive individuals.ConclusionHigher frequency of comorbidity between aPLs and headache was observed in healthy individuals and patient cases. Therefore, experimental studies are warranted to evaluate the aPLs-induced pathogenic mechanism of headache.</jats:sec

Melatonin and Sleep Disturbances in Alzheimer’s Disease

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by sleep, behavioral, memory, and cognitive deteriorations. Sleep disturbance (SD) is a major disease burden in AD, which has a reciprocal relationship with AD pathophysiology. It aggravates memory, behavioral, and cognitive complications in AD. Different studies have found that melatonin hormone levels reduce even in the pre-clinical stages of AD. Melatonin is the primary sleep-regulating hormone and a potent antioxidant with neuroprotective roles. The decrease in melatonin levels can thus promote SD and AD neuropathology. Exogenous melatonin has the potential to alleviate neuropathology and SD in AD by different mechanisms. Various studies have been conducted to assess the efficacy of exogenous melatonin to treat SD in AD. Though most of the studies suggest that melatonin is useful to ameliorate SD in AD, the remaining studies show opposite results. The timing, dosage, and duration of melatonin administration along with disease condition, genetic, environmental, and some other factors can be responsible for the discrepancies between the studies. More extensive trials with longer durations and higher dosage forms and studies including bright light therapy and melatonin agonists (ramelteon, agomelatine, and tasimelteon) should be performed to determine the efficacy of melatonin to treat SD in AD. </jats:sec

Prevalence of Headache in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 14,275 Patients

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) started to spread globally since December 2019 from Wuhan, China. Headache has been observed as one of the clinical manifestations in COVID-19 patients. We aimed to conduct a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the overall pooled prevalence of headache in COVID-19 patients.Methods: PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar databases were searched to identify studies published between December 2019 and March 2020. Adult (≥18 years) COVID-19 patients were considered eligible. We used random-effects model to estimate the pooled prevalence with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Quality assessment was done using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020182529).Results: We identified 2,055 studies, of which 86 studies (n = 14,275, 49.4% female) were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, the pooled prevalence of headache in COVID-19 patients was 10.1% [95% CI: 8.76–11.49]. There was no significant difference of headache prevalence in severe or critical vs. non-severe (RR: 1.05, p = 0.78), survived (recovered or discharged) vs. non-survived (RR: 1.36, p = 0.23), and ICU vs. non-ICU (RR: 1.06, p = 0.87) COVID-19 patients. We detected 64.0, 34.9, and 1.1% of the included studies as high, moderate, and low quality, respectively.Conclusions: From the first 4-month data of the outbreak, headache was detected in 10.1% of the adult COVID-19 patients.</jats:p

Prevalence of Headache in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 14,275 Patients

© 2020 The Authors. Published by Frontiers Media. This is an open access article available under a Creative Commons licence. The published version can be accessed at the following link on the publisher’s website: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.562634Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) started to spread globally since December 2019 from Wuhan, China. Headache has been observed as one of the clinical manifestations in COVID-19 patients. We aimed to conduct a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the overall pooled prevalence of headache in COVID-19 patients. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar databases were searched to identify studies published between December 2019 and March 2020. Adult (≥18 years) COVID-19 patients were considered eligible. We used random-effects model to estimate the pooled prevalence with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Quality assessment was done using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020182529). Results: We identified 2,055 studies, of which 86 studies (n = 14,275, 49.4% female) were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, the pooled prevalence of headache in COVID-19 patients was 10.1% [95% CI: 8.76–11.49]. There was no significant difference of headache prevalence in severe or critical vs. non-severe (RR: 1.05, p = 0.78), survived (recovered or discharged) vs. non-survived (RR: 1.36, p = 0.23), and ICU vs. non-ICU (RR: 1.06, p = 0.87) COVID-19 patients. We detected 64.0, 34.9, and 1.1% of the included studies as high, moderate, and low quality, respectively. Conclusions: From the first 4-month data of the outbreak, headache was detected in 10.1% of the adult COVID-19 patients.Published versio

Encephalitis in patients with COVID-19:a systematic evidence-based analysis

Although severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) predominantly infects the respiratory system, several investigations have shown the involvement of the central nervous system (CNS) along the course of the illness, with encephalitis being one of the symptoms. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the characteristics (clinical, neuro-radiological aspects, and laboratory features) and outcomes of encephalitis in COVID-19 patients. PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases were searched from 1 December 2019 until 21 July 2022 to identify case reports and case series published on COVID-19 associated with encephalitis. The quality of the included studies was assessed by the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklists. This systematic review included 79 studies, including 91 COVID-19 patients (52.7% male) experiencing encephalitis, where 85.6% were adults (49.3 ± 20.2 years), and 14.4% were children (11.2 ± 7.6 years). RT-PCR was used to confirm 92.2% of the COVID-19 patients. Encephalitis-related symptoms were present in 78.0% of COVID-19 patients at the time of diagnosis. In these encephalitis patients, seizure (29.5%), confusion (23.2%), headache (20.5%), disorientation (15.2%), and altered mental status (11.6%) were the most frequently reported neurologic manifestations. Looking at the MRI, EEG, and CSF findings, 77.6%, 75.5%, and 64.1% of the patients represented abnormal results. SARS-CoV-2-associated or -mediated encephalitis were the most common type observed (59.3%), followed by autoimmune encephalitis (18.7%). Among the included patients, 66.7% were discharged (37.8% improved and 28.9% fully recovered), whereas 20.0% of the reported COVID-19-positive encephalitis patients died. Based on the quality assessment, 87.4% of the studies were of high quality. Although in COVID-19, encephalitis is not a typical phenomenon, SARS-CoV-2 seems like a neuropathogen affecting the brain even when there are no signs of respiratory illness, causing a high rate of disability and fatality