8 research outputs found

    Who will follow the leader? Managers' perceptions of management development activities: an international comparison: SKOPE Research Paper No. 51, Autumn 2004

    No full text
    This article contributes to the on-going debate surrounding management education and development through an examination of the development experiences of managers studying for an MBA by distance learning at Warwick Business School. It analyses the extent to which management development opportunities, both formal and informal, are seen to support managers in their day-to-day roles and deliver those skills necessary for the future. The research also provides the opportunity to compare responses from UK managers with those from managers in other countries. The survey evidence shows that in some respects the experience of UK and Overseas respondents are quite similar; they both receive large amounts of training and development from their employers and show a preference for more ‘non-formal’ routes of learning. In other ways their experiences are quite different: UK managers take up their first full-time job and their first managerial appointment earlier than the overseas respondents and overseas respondents placed much more emphasis on networking and learning from outside their own organisations than did UK managers. The research also suggests that integrating management development activities with other human resource policies and practices, such as performance evaluation and reward remains problematic and that there is a strong perception amongst managers both in the UK and overseas that their organisations do not view management development in a strategic way. When looking at future development needs respondents from both the UK and overseas highlighted the need for leadership skills as a priority for themselves but focused on more general management and operational skills as the main priority for their colleagues. One possible explanation for this is that the respondents were only to well aware of the fact that that leaders need followers. This is, however, a view at which is at odds with current policy arguments in the UK where leadership skills are seen to be necessary for all managers

    Large-Scale Evaluation of Maize Germplasm for Low-Phosphorus Tolerance

    No full text
    <div><p>Low-phosphorus (LP) stress is a global problem for maize production and has been exacerbated by breeding activities that have reduced the genetic diversity of maize. Although LP tolerance in maize has been previously evaluated, the evaluations were generally performed with only a small number of accessions or with samples collected from a limited area. In this research, 826 maize accessions (including 580 tropical/subtropical accessions and 246 temperate accessions) were evaluated for LP tolerance under field conditions in 2011 and 2012. Plant height (PH) and leaf number were measured at three growth stages. The normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and fresh ear weight (FEW) were also measured. Genetic correlation analysis revealed that FEW and NDVI were strongly correlated with PH, especially at later stages. LP-tolerant and -sensitive accessions were selected based on the relative trait values of all traits using principal component analysis, and all the 14 traits of the tolerant maize accessions showed less reduction than the sensitive accessions under LP conditions. LP tolerance was strongly correlated with agronomic performance under LP stress conditions, and both criteria could be used for genetic analysis and breeding of LP tolerance. Temperate accessions showed slightly better LP tolerance than tropical/subtropical ones, although more tolerant accessions were identified from tropical/subtropical accessions, which could be contributed by their larger sample size. This large-scale evaluation provides useful information, LP-tolerant germplasm resources and evaluation protocol for genetic analysis and developing maize varieties for LP tolerance.</p></div

    Classification of 826 maize accessions for their responses to LP stress based on LPTI and LPPI.

    No full text
    <p>LPPI: LP performance index; LPTI: LP tolerance index; TG: tolerant and good-performance group; SG: sensitive and good-performance group; TP: tolerant and poor-performance group; SP: sensitive and poor-performance group. The number in the bracketsis the number of maize accessions in each group.</p

    Distribution of all traits measured for 826 maize accessions.

    No full text
    <p>PH: plant height; LN: leaf number; NDVI: normalized difference vegetation index; FEW: fresh ear weight; DAP: days after planting; LP: low-P; NP: normal-P; Percentage: the number of accessions in each interval divided by the total number of accessions.</p
    corecore