Additional file 1 of Targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 enhances radiosensitivity and reduces the metastatic potential of Lewis lung carcinoma cells

Additional file 1: Figure S1. LLC cells divided into HER2-knockdown group and vector-control group were seeded in the Matrigel-coated inserts of Boyden chambers, and treated with sham radiation (no RT) or radiation 7.5Gy (RT) and with or without zoledronic acid (ZA, 30 μM). After 24 h the invading cells were fixed, stained, and viewed by microscope (200X). Invading cells were counted. The effect of MMP9 inhibition on reducing invasiveness were presented by the ratio of invaded cell counts in groups with ZA to groups without ZA

DataSheet_1_Radiosensitization effect by HDAC inhibition improves NKG2D-dependent natural killer cytotoxicity in hepatocellular carcinoma.docx

BackgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Radiotherapy (RT) controls HCC unsatisfactorily and temporarily. Histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) is a heterogeneous group of epigenetic therapeutics with promising anticancer effects and synergism in combination with RT. HDACi modulates natural killer (NK) cell ligand expression on tumor cells, and leads to immune evasion of cancer cells. Expressions of NK group 2D (NKG2D) ligands on cancer cells determine the cytotoxic effect by interacting with NKG2D receptor on NK cells. However, the role of NKG2D signaling in HCC upon combined RT and HDACi remains unclear.MethodIn vitro co-culture system with NK cells was tested for human and murine HCC cell lines. Pan-HDACi (panobinostat) and specific HDAC4 knockdown (HDAC4-KD) were used for HDAC inhibition. Clonogenic assay and flow cytometry examined HCC cell survival and NKG2D ligand expression, respectively. Syngeneic mouse model was used to validate the radiosensitizing effect in vivo.ResultsCombined RT and HDACi/HDAC4-KD significantly enhanced NK cell-related cytotoxicity and increased NKG2D ligands, MICA/MICB expressions in human and RAE-1/H60 expressions in murine HCC cells. Delayed tumor growth in vivo by the combinational treatment of RT and HDACi/HDAC4-KD was shown with the associated NKG2D ligand expressions. However, NKG2D receptor did not significantly change among tumors.ConclusionRadiosensitizing effect with combined RT and HDAC inhibition increased the expression of NKG2D ligands in HCC cells and enhanced their susceptibility to NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity. These findings imply the potential use of combined RT/HDACi and NK cell-directed immunotherapy.</p

Table_1_Competing Risk Analysis of Outcomes of Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer Patients Undergoing Definitive Radiotherapy.docx

PurposeWe investigated potential factors, including clinicopathological features, treatment modalities, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 level, tumor responses correlating with overall survival (OS), local progression (LP), and distant metastases (DMs), in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) who received definitive radiotherapy (RT).MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed demographic characteristics; biologically effective doses (BED10, calculated with an α/β of 10) of RT; and clinical outcomes of 57 unresectable LAPC (all pancreatic adenocarcinoma) patients receiving definitive RT using modern techniques with and without systemic therapy between January 2009 and March 2019 at our institution. We used Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 to evaluate the radiographic tumor response after RT. The association between prognostic factors and OS was assessed using the Kaplan–Meier analysis and a Cox regression model, whereas baseline characteristics and treatment details were collected for competing-risk regression of the association with LP and DM using the Fine–Gray model.ResultsA median BED10 of 67.1 Gy resulted in a disease control rate of 87.7%, and the median OS was 11.8 months after a median follow-up of 32.1 months. The 1-year OS rate, cumulative incidences of LP, and DM were 49.2%, 38.5%, and 62.9%, respectively. Multivariate analyses showed that pre-RT NLR ≥3.5 (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 8.245, p 10 ≥ 67.1 Gy (adjusted sHR = 0.297, p = 0.002), CA19-9 reduction rate ≥50% (adjusted sHR = 0.334, p = 0.023), and RT alone (adjusted sHR = 2.633, p = 0.047) were significant prognostic factors for DM.ConclusionOur results indicate that pre-RT NLR and post-RT monitoring of CA19-9 and tumor size reduction can help identify whether patients belong to the good or poor prognostic group of LAPC. The incorporation of new systemic treatments during and after a higher BED10 RT dose for LAPC patients is warranted.</p

Table_2_Competing Risk Analysis of Outcomes of Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer Patients Undergoing Definitive Radiotherapy.docx

PurposeWe investigated potential factors, including clinicopathological features, treatment modalities, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 level, tumor responses correlating with overall survival (OS), local progression (LP), and distant metastases (DMs), in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) who received definitive radiotherapy (RT).MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed demographic characteristics; biologically effective doses (BED10, calculated with an α/β of 10) of RT; and clinical outcomes of 57 unresectable LAPC (all pancreatic adenocarcinoma) patients receiving definitive RT using modern techniques with and without systemic therapy between January 2009 and March 2019 at our institution. We used Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 to evaluate the radiographic tumor response after RT. The association between prognostic factors and OS was assessed using the Kaplan–Meier analysis and a Cox regression model, whereas baseline characteristics and treatment details were collected for competing-risk regression of the association with LP and DM using the Fine–Gray model.ResultsA median BED10 of 67.1 Gy resulted in a disease control rate of 87.7%, and the median OS was 11.8 months after a median follow-up of 32.1 months. The 1-year OS rate, cumulative incidences of LP, and DM were 49.2%, 38.5%, and 62.9%, respectively. Multivariate analyses showed that pre-RT NLR ≥3.5 (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 8.245, p 10 ≥ 67.1 Gy (adjusted sHR = 0.297, p = 0.002), CA19-9 reduction rate ≥50% (adjusted sHR = 0.334, p = 0.023), and RT alone (adjusted sHR = 2.633, p = 0.047) were significant prognostic factors for DM.ConclusionOur results indicate that pre-RT NLR and post-RT monitoring of CA19-9 and tumor size reduction can help identify whether patients belong to the good or poor prognostic group of LAPC. The incorporation of new systemic treatments during and after a higher BED10 RT dose for LAPC patients is warranted.</p

Additional file 1 of Effectiveness of tutor shadowing on faculty development in problem-based learning

Additional file 1

Differences in toxicity and outcome associated with circadian variations between patients undergoing daytime and evening radiotherapy for prostate adenocarcinoma

<p>This retrospective study tested the hypothesis that disease control and treatment-related toxicity in patients undergoing high-dose radiotherapy (HDRT) for prostate cancer varies in a circadian manner. Patients with localized prostate adenocarcinoma receiving HDRT (median 78 Gy) to the prostate and involved seminal vesicle(s) without elective pelvic irradiation were divided into a daytime treatment (before 5 PM) group (<i>n</i> = 267) and evening treatment (after 5 PM) group (<i>n</i> = 142). Biochemical failure (Phoenix definition), acute and late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary toxicities (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4), biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS) and freedom from late toxicity were assessed. Analyses were performed by binary logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard regression. The median follow-up was 68 months, and 75% of patients were ≥70 years old. Evening HDRT was significantly associated with worse freedom from ≥grade 2 late GI complications (hazard ratio = 2.96; <i>p</i> < 0.001). The detrimental effect of evening HDRT was significant in patients older than 70 years old (<i>p</i> < 0.001) but not in younger patients (<i>p</i> = 0.63). In a subgroup of propensity score-matched cohort with T2b–T3 disease (<i>n</i> = 154), the 5-year BFFS was worse in the evening group than the daytime group (72% vs. 85%, hazard ratio = 1.95, <i>p</i> = 0.05). Our study indicates that evening HDRT may lead to more GI complications, especially in older patients, and worse BFFS in patients with T2b–T3 disease.</p