3 research outputs found

    Radiotherapy Trends and Variations in Invasive Non-metastatic Breast Cancer Treatment in the Netherlands:A Nationwide Overview From 2008 to 2019

    No full text
    Aims: This nationwide study provides an overview of trends and variations in radiotherapy use as part of multimodal treatment of invasive non-metastatic breast cancer in the Netherlands in 2008–2019. Materials and Methods: Women with invasive non-metastatic breast cancer were selected from the population-based Netherlands Cancer Registry. Treatments trends were presented over time. Factors associated with (1) boost irradiation in breast-conserving therapy and (2) regional radiotherapy instead of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in N+ disease were identified using multilevel logistic regression analyses. Results: Radiotherapy use increased from 61% (2008) to 70% (2016), caused by breast-conserving therapy instead of mastectomy, increased post-mastectomy radiotherapy, and increased regional radiotherapy (32% in 2011 to 61% in 2019) instead of ALND in N+ disease. Omission of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in 2016–2019 (4–9%, respectively), mainly in elderly, decreased overall radiotherapy use to 67%. Radiotherapy treatment was further de-escalated by decreased boost irradiation in breast-conserving therapy (66% in 2011 to 37% in 2019) and partial (1% in 2011 to 6% in 2019) instead of whole breast irradiation following BCS. Boost irradiation was associated with high-risk features: younger age (OR&gt;75 vs &lt;50:0.04, 95%CI:0.03–0.05), higher grade (OR grade III vs I:11.46, 95%CI:9.90–13.26) and residual disease (OR focal residual vs R0-resection:28.08, 95%CI:23.07–34.17). Variation across the country was found for both boost irradiation use (OR South vs North:0.58, 95%CI:0.49–0.68), and regional radiotherapy instead of ALND (OR Southwest vs North:0.55, 95%CI:0.37–0.80). Conclusion: Overall radiotherapy use increased in 2008–2016, while a decreasing trend was observed after 2016, caused by post-BCS radiotherapy omission. Boost irradiation in breast-conserving therapy became omitted in low-risk patients, and regional radiotherapy use increased as an alternative for ALND in N+ disease.</p

    Physical activity levels of women with breast cancer during and after treatment, a comparison with the Dutch female population

    No full text
    Background: Physical activity has been shown to reduce side-effects of breast cancer and its treatment. As physical activity levels of patients with breast cancer are largely unknown, we investigated these levels and compared them to women from the general population. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, physical activity levels of women with breast cancer participating in the UMBRELLA cohort were assessed at radiotherapy intake and thereafter every 6 months up to 3 years with the SQUASH questionnaire, which was also used in a random sample of the Dutch population. We compared physical activity levels (no activity, low, moderate or high levels of sports, leisure time or total activity) between patients and the Dutch female population using multinomial logistic regression. Standardized Prevalence Ratios (SPR) were calculated to compare adherence to Dutch physical activity guidelines. Results: Women with breast cancer (n baseline = 1655, n 6 months = 1414, n 12 months = 1186, n 18 months = 957, n 24 months = 744, n 30 months = 555, and n 36 months = 377) were less likely to spend time in physical activity compared to the general population (n = 11,710) until 3 years post-diagnosis, especially after 6 months (OR high-vs.-no activity = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.28–0.41). From 12 months onwards, patients were more likely to perform sports compared to the general population, especially patients who underwent systemic therapy. Guideline adherence was significantly lower in patients at baseline and 6 months (SPR baseline = 89, 95% CI: 82–97; SPR 6 months = 88, 95% CI: 81–96), and comparable to the general population at 12–36 months, especially in older women. Conclusions: Physical activity levels in women with breast cancer during and after treatment were lower compared to the Dutch female population. Three years post-treatment, they were still less physically active, although they spend more time in sport activities. As about half of the patients did not perform any sports, physical activity needs to be stimulated during and after treatment
    corecore