23 research outputs found
Registros novos e adicionais de Agalliinae, Gyponinae e Nirvaniinae (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) para o Estado de Minas Gerais, Brasil
Coelho LBN, Da-Silva ER, Ferreira PSF. 2001. Registros novos e
adicionais de Agalliinae, Gyponinae e Nirvaniinae (Homoptera:
Cicadellidae) para o Estado de Minas Gerais, Brasil. Entomotropica
16(2):131-135 . Agallia alvarengai , A. configurata, A. cucata,
Agalliopsis ornaticollis (Agalliinae), Curtara antica , C. atomaria,
Gypona validana , Hecalapona ferosa (Gyponinae) e Neonirvana hyalina
(Nirvaniinae) s\ue3o pela primeira vez registradas para o Estado de
Minas Gerais, Brasil. Agallia albidula , A. cezia (Agalliinae) e
Acuera gloma (Gyponinae) s\ue3o pela primeira vez registradas para
o munic\uedpio de Vi\ue7osa.Coelho LBN, Da-Silva ER, Ferreira PSF. 2001. New and additional records
of Agalliinae, Gyponinae e Nirvaniinae (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) from
State of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Entomotropica 16(2):131-135. Agallia
alvarengai , A. configurata, A. cucata, Agalliopsis ornaticollis
(Agalliinae), Curtara antica , C. atomaria, Gypona validana ,
Hecalapona ferosa (Gyponinae) and Neonirvana hyalina (Nirvaniinae)
are for the first time recorded from Minas Gerais State, Brazil.
Agallia albidula , A. cezia (Agalliinae) and Acuera gloma
(Gyponinae) are for the first time recorded from the county of
Vi\ue7osa
Miridae (Heteroptera) fitófagos e predadores de Minas Gerais, Brasil, com ênfase em espécies com potencial econômico
Habitat heterogeneity on feeding habit of two sympatric and congeneric characidae fishes in two tropical reservoirs
Pervasive gaps in Amazonian ecological research
Biodiversity loss is one of the main challenges of our time,1,2 and attempts to address it require a clear understanding of how ecological communities respond to environmental change across time and space.3,4 While the increasing availability of global databases on ecological communities has advanced our knowledge of biodiversity sensitivity to environmental changes,5,6,7 vast areas of the tropics remain understudied.8,9,10,11 In the American tropics, Amazonia stands out as the world's most diverse rainforest and the primary source of Neotropical biodiversity,12 but it remains among the least known forests in America and is often underrepresented in biodiversity databases.13,14,15 To worsen this situation, human-induced modifications16,17 may eliminate pieces of the Amazon's biodiversity puzzle before we can use them to understand how ecological communities are responding. To increase generalization and applicability of biodiversity knowledge,18,19 it is thus crucial to reduce biases in ecological research, particularly in regions projected to face the most pronounced environmental changes. We integrate ecological community metadata of 7,694 sampling sites for multiple organism groups in a machine learning model framework to map the research probability across the Brazilian Amazonia, while identifying the region's vulnerability to environmental change. 15%–18% of the most neglected areas in ecological research are expected to experience severe climate or land use changes by 2050. This means that unless we take immediate action, we will not be able to establish their current status, much less monitor how it is changing and what is being lost
Pervasive gaps in Amazonian ecological research
Biodiversity loss is one of the main challenges of our time,1,2 and attempts to address it require a clear understanding of how ecological communities respond to environmental change across time and space.3,4 While the increasing availability of global databases on ecological communities has advanced our knowledge of biodiversity sensitivity to environmental changes,5,6,7 vast areas of the tropics remain understudied.8,9,10,11 In the American tropics, Amazonia stands out as the world's most diverse rainforest and the primary source of Neotropical biodiversity,12 but it remains among the least known forests in America and is often underrepresented in biodiversity databases.13,14,15 To worsen this situation, human-induced modifications16,17 may eliminate pieces of the Amazon's biodiversity puzzle before we can use them to understand how ecological communities are responding. To increase generalization and applicability of biodiversity knowledge,18,19 it is thus crucial to reduce biases in ecological research, particularly in regions projected to face the most pronounced environmental changes. We integrate ecological community metadata of 7,694 sampling sites for multiple organism groups in a machine learning model framework to map the research probability across the Brazilian Amazonia, while identifying the region's vulnerability to environmental change. 15%–18% of the most neglected areas in ecological research are expected to experience severe climate or land use changes by 2050. This means that unless we take immediate action, we will not be able to establish their current status, much less monitor how it is changing and what is being lost
Ants in the Ant-Man movie, with biological notes
Da-Silva, E.R.; de Campos, T.R.M. (2017) Ants in the Ant-Man movie, with biological notes. Journal of Geek Studies 4(2): 21-30
Oligoneuria macabaiba sp. nov. (Insecta: Ephemeroptera) from Brazil
The former monotypic genus Oligoneuria Pictet was known solely by a female subimago of the type-species Oligoneuria anomala Pictet. A new species of the genus Oligoneuria from the Atlantic rainforest of Macaé, Rio de Janeiro is described. The description was based in males and females imagos of Oligoneuria macabaiba sp. nov. caught with light traps. This species presents similar wing venation, abdominal posterolateral spines, as well as a membranous extension on anterior portion of the head as seen in the genus. Based on features of the new species, the genus is herein redefined. The species represents the first record of the genus from Southeastern Brazil. Rev. Biol. Trop. 59 (4): 1553-1557. Epub 2011 December 01
Thraulodes jones Gonçalves, Da-Silva & Nessimian, 2010, sp. nov.
Thraulodes jones sp. nov. Gonçalves, Da-Silva & Nessimian Male Imago (Holotype): Length: body 12.0 mm; forewing 12.4 mm; hind wing 2.0 mm. General coloration light brown, with dark brown markings. First abdominal segments whitish. Wings hyaline. Head: Area between eyes and ocelli dark brown. Anterior margin of head yellowish, translucent. Ocelli white surrounded by black ring. Upper portion of turbinate eyes orange brown. Base of antenna surrounded by dark brown; scape with dark brown ring and pedicel dark brown; flagellum yellowish. Thorax: Pronotum yellowish bearing two median dark marks extending to posterior margin. General color of mesonotum and metanotum light brown. Posterior area of mesonotum yellowish, apex dark brown. Prosternum and mesosternum dark brown. Mesosternum with two median longitudinal light brown lines. Metasternum whitish with two dark brown markings. Thoracic pleura whitish with dark brown marks. Legs: Femora of foreleg whitish with a blackish subtriangular basal mark; blackish median band, well marked centrally and inconspicuous toward margins; inner margin of femora with apical half blackish; apical margin of femora blackish; area between median band and apex orange brown. Tibia light orange brown, distal fourth blackish. Tarsus brown with base and apex whitish; last tarsal segment and tarsal claws blackish (Fig. 1). Median and hind legs similar to foreleg in color, except for lack of basal blackish mark on femora; tarsi yellowish, with last tarsomere blackish. Wings: Membrane of wings hyaline with dark brown stain at base (Figs. 2–3). Forewing veins brownish, hind wing veins whitish. Area between C, Sc and R 1 of forewing whitish toward apex. Five basal and 17–18 cross-veins distal to bullae. Abdomen: Tergum I whitish with wide anteromedian blackish mark. Terga II–VI whitish translucent bearing 3 pairs of sub apical marks: median, sublateral and lateral. Terga VII–X orange brown. Terga VII–IX possessing one lateral sub apical blackish mark; anterior and posterior margins dark brown, except for anterior margin of tergum IX. All terga possessing a blackish dash on lateral margins (Fig. 4). Sterna whitish translucent. Sterna I–VII with pair of median, sub apical and apical-lateral blackish spots. Sterna VIII–IX without marks. Genitalia: Styliger plate whitish bearing very subtle grooves, posterior median projection present with rounded apex. Forceps whitish, first segment with distal half washed with gray, second segment with rounded internal distal projection. Penes long and slender, without lateral pouch. Inner margin sclerotized; apicolateral area with acute projection directed externally and posterioly; subapical spines long and projected internally and posteriorly (Fig. 5). Caudal filaments whitish, with wide and narrow dark brown bands irregularly distributed. Variations: Body measurements were smaller in some specimens, about 10.0 mm body length; 11.0 mm forewing; and 2.0 mm hind wing; Paratypes showed scape whitish and flagella shaded with dark brown. In one male paratype, the triangular mark at base of fore femora was absent and only 4 cross-veins basal to bullae were found. The dashes on lateral margins of abdominal terga were less conspicuous at first abdominal segments on one paratype. Female Imago: Length: body 10.0–11.0 mm; forewing 11.5–12.7 mm; hind wing 1.4 –2.0 mm. General coloration light brown, abdomen shaded with dark brown. Wings hyaline. Head: Area between eyes and ocelli shaded with dark brown. Eyes black. Ocelli white surrounded by black. Anterior margin of head yellowish. Scape yellowish, pedicel dark brown and flagellum shaded with dark brown. Thorax: Pronotum yellowish; anterior and posterior margins of pronotum dark brown; median mark shaded with dark brown from which 2 pairs of marks arise, one on each side of pronotum. General color of mesonotum and metanotum as in male. Prosternum and metasternum whitish. Mesosternum dark brown with two median longitudinal light brown lines. Legs: Legs similar to male. Wings: Wings similar to male, except for having 3–4 cross-veins basal to bullae and C, Sc and R 1 area of forewing not whitish toward apex. Abdomen: Terga I–III shaded with dark brown; tergum IV also shaded except for yellowish median triangular mark extending from middle to posterior margin; terga V–VI yellowish shaded with dark brown on anterior area; tergum VII yellowish with anterior and posterior margins shaded with dark brown; tergum VIII yellowish, shaded with dark brown on anterior margin; terga IX–X yellowish; terga III–VI with a pair of sub apical dark brown marks; all terga possessing a dark brown dash on lateral margins. Sterna I–VI with a pair of apico-lateral dark brown marks, remaining sterna yellowish. Apex of female sternum cleft, V-shaped. Caudal filaments whitish, with wide and narrow dark brown bands irregularly distributed. Variations: Some females showed terga VII–IX more heavily shaded with dark brown. Females collected at Macaé de Cima, Nova Friburgo, were found to be slightly bigger: body 11.5 –12.0 mm; forewing: 15.0– 16.2 mm; hind wing: 2.0– 2.1 mm. They also showed a color pattern more intense than described above, prosternum with dark brown median mark and abdominal sterna with color pattern as in males. Mature Nymph (male): Length: body: 10.0–11.0 mm; caudal filaments: more than 13.0 mm (broken). General color dark brown with light brown areas. Head: Ocelli black; area surrounding ocelli light brown. Eyes black; turbinated portion dark brown reddish. Antennae about 2.6–2.7 times the size of the head, scape and pedicel dark brown, flagellum light brown. Labrum brown with basal lateral area light brown, wider than clypeus; its width about 3 times its length; presence of apical and sub-apical rows of whitish long setae (Fig. 6); anterior margin straight; with five very subtle emarginations (Fig. 7); lateral margins rounded. Mandibles with row of whitish setae on outer margin extending to level of outer incisor; setae long on distal half and short on basal half; outer margin projected; inner margin of outer incisor and both margins of inner incisor serrate; molars with serrate ridges; prosthecae well developed. Incisors, outer margin and basal third of mandibles brown; apical third whitish; molars and prosthecae light brown (Figs. 8–9). Right mandible outer incisor with three apical denticles; inner incisor with two denticles (Fig. 10); setae near molars light brown. Left mandible possessing 3 denticles on inner and outer incisors (Fig. 11). Maxilla whitish, flattened and rectangular; apical margin brown with row of apical long brown setae, simple and pectinated, and sub-apical interrupted row of shorter but thicker setae; inner margin bordered by long light brown setae, culminating on single pectinated setae; outer margin brown, dark brown basal to palpi insertion; posterior margin light brown, with light brown setae; palpi brown with outer margin bordered by long whitish setae, denser on segment III; inner margin of segment III and apical third of segment II with row of long setae (Fig. 12). Hypopharynx whitish with light brown setae; superlingua bearing long setae on apical margin and at base (Fig. 13); apex of lingua ventrally covered by short setae; outer margin more densely setose so that the region appears to be somewhat darkened. Labium yellowish white; densely covered by long light brown setae on glossa and apical third of paraglossa; first segment of palpi with scattered whitish setae on inner and outer margins; second segment with denser setae at apical third, outer margin with long setae and inner margin bearing short, spine-like setae (Fig. 14). Thorax: Pronotum brown with several scattered light brown spots; lateral margins light brown with sublateral dark brown stripe, posterior margin with light brown border not reaching lateral margins. General coloration of mesonotum dark brown, scattered with several brown spots; two brown longitudinal lines one on each side of median suture. Wing pads light brown, veins dark brown. Thoracic sterna yellowish. Legs: Femora of all legs brown with light brown marks, tibia, tarsi and claw light brown. Foreleg (Fig. 15): coxa with wide dark brown margin, outer margin bordered by long simple setae; femora dark brown with one basal, one sub-median and one sub-apical light brown marks; basal mark lighter, with inner grayish spot; outer margin with row of simple long setae and fewer shorter clavate setae, inner margin with few long simple setae, not as long as those of outer margin; margins and dorsal area of femora presenting short bristles; outer margin and dorsal region of tibia with row of simple setae, not as long as those on femora; inner margin with row of spines; apical half of tibia and tarsus somewhat shaded with brown; tarsus bearing simple setae. Tarsal claws with seven denticles, apical denticle over twice longer than subapical denticle (Fig. 16). Mid leg (Fig. 17): similar to foreleg except femora with one basal and one sub apical light brown mark and inner margin with row of strong short spines; outer margin of tibia with fringe of long simple setae; inner margin without setae. Hind leg (Fig. 18): similar to foreleg except basal mark of femora less conspicuous than in other legs, reduced to a line; inner margin with row of strong short spines, slightly longer than those of mid leg; outer margin of tibia fringed with long simple setae, short bristles and few clavate setae, inner margin with row of short bristles and row of long simple setae, although not as long as those of femora; outer margin of tarsus with row of simple long setae, some clavate setae and short bristles; Abdomen: Terga I–VII mainly dark brown, postero-lateral areas light brown; terga VIII–X light brown, somewhat yellowish. Tergum X with median mark and lateral margins dark brown (Fig. 19). Caudal filaments brownish. Posterior margin of terga and caudal filaments with row of spines, longer on caudal filaments. Gills purplish gray, with symmetrical lamellae; main trachea strongly pigmented but branches are visible although weakly marked; gills broad, tapering toward apex (Fig. 20). Variations: Body length was higher on female mature nymphs, reaching 12.0 mm. Some specimens showed different abdominal color pattern, with dark brown anterior margin on tergum VIII and on tergum IX, this coloration was interrupted on median region. Aside that, subtle variations on color intensity were found, with specimens overall darker or lighter on their color patterns. Type material: Holotype: Brazil, Rio de Janeiro: Nova Friburgo, Lumiar, Rio Boa Vista, Cachoeira Indiana Jones, 900 m, 22 o 19 '02.1"S / 42 o 17 ' 28.5 "W, 15.xi. 2008, Gonçalves, I.C. leg. 1 male imago (DZRJ 800); Alotype: Nova Friburgo, Lumiar, tributário de primeira ordem do Córrego Santa Margarida, 844 m, 22 o 20 ' 35.5 "S / 42 o 18 '00.0"W, 16.xi. 2008, Gonçalves, I.C. leg. (Light trap) 1 female imago (alotype; DZRJ 807). Paratypes: same data, 2 nymphs (MZUSP); same data, 1 nymph (DZRJ 802); same locality and date, Alecrim, V.P. leg. 6 nymphs (DZRJ 803); same data, 1 nymph (DZRJ 804); Nova Friburgo, Lumiar, Rio Boa Vista, 583 m, 22 o 23 ' 57.9 "S / 42 o 19 ' 14.6 "W, 15.xi. 2008, Alecrim, V.P. leg. 1 nymph (DZRJ 805); Nova Friburgo, Lumiar, first order tributary of Córrego Santa Margarida, 844 m, 22 o 20 ' 35.5 "S / 42 o 18 '00.0"W, 16.xi. 2008, Gonçalves, I.C. leg. (Light trap), 1 male and 3 female imagos (MZUSP); same data, 1 male imago (DZRJ 806); Additional material: Brazil, Rio de Janeiro: Nova Friburgo, Macaé de Cima, Rio Macaé, 935 m, 22 o 24 ' 46 "S / 42 o 31 ' 16.2 "W, 12.ix. 2009, Alecrim, V.P. leg., 4 female imagos (DZRJ 812); same data, Gonçalves, I.C. leg., 1 nymph (MZUSP); same locality, 13.ix. 2009, Gonçalves, I.C. leg., 1 female imago (DZRJ 809); same data, 1 female subimago (DZRJ 810); same data, 5 nymphs (DZRJ 811); same locality, 14.ix. 2009, Alecrim, V.P. leg., 3 female imagos (MZUSP); same locality, 18.ix. 2008, Alecrim, V.P. leg., 4 nymphs (DZRJ 808); Nova Friburgo, Macaé de Cima, Rio Macaé, 977 m, 22 º 25 ’ 30.6 ’’S / 42 º 32 ’00.7’’W, 13.ix. 2009, Gonçalves, I.C. leg., 3 nymphs (MZUSP); Teresópolis, Parque Nacional da Serra dos Órgãos, Rio Paquequer, 933 m, 22 ° 27 ' 8.13 "S / 42 ° 59 ' 31.77 "W, 10.v. 2008, Henriques-Oliveira, A.L., Santos, A.P.M. & Ferreira-Jr., N. leg. (light trap), 1 male subimago (DZRJ 816); Macaé, Sana, Córrego do Colégio, 294 m, 22 ° 20 ' 23.4 "S / 42 ° 12 ' 13.5 "W, 19.ii. 2009, Gonçalves, I.C. leg. (light trap), one female subimago (DZRJ 818); same data, 1 male and 2 female imagos (DZRJ 819); São Paulo: Ubatuba, Parque Estadual da Serra do Mar – Núcleo Picinguaba, Rio da Fazenda, 41 m, 23 ° 20 ' 16.7 "S / 44 ° 50 ' 10.9 "W, 02.x. 2005, Santos, A.P.M. & Dumas, L.L. leg. (Light trap), 1 male and 2 female subimagos (DZRJ 821); same locality and date, Santos, A.P.M. leg. (Light trap), 1 male subimago (DZRJ 822). Etymology: The name jones is a reference to the type locality, the Boa Vista river at Indiana Jones waterfall. Life cycle associations: Nymphs and adults were associated from one male nymph (Holotype) and two female nymphs reared to adult stage. Biology: Nymphs were found on rocky stream bottoms in areas of moderate current.Published as part of Gonçalves, Inês C., Da-Silva, Elidiomar R. & Nessimian, Jorge L., 2010, A new species of Thraulodes Ulmer (Ephemeroptera: Leptophlebiidae) from Southeastern Brazil, pp. 61-68 in Zootaxa 2438 on pages 62-67, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19489