14 research outputs found
Scenario description and parameter definition.
a<p>Parameters definition: <i>m,</i> growth rate of GDP per capita (%); <i>r</i>, population growth rate (%); <i>k</i>, technology progress rate (%); <i>f</i>, energy structure optimization rate (%).</p>b<p>Data sources: The values of parameters are calculated or assumed based on the references from CCAP <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0077699#pone.0077699-Center1" target="_blank">[44]</a>, <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0077699#pone.0077699-Center2" target="_blank">[45]</a>, CAS <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0077699#pone.0077699-Study1" target="_blank">[46]</a>, SCPRC <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0077699#pone.0077699-State1" target="_blank">[47]</a>, <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0077699#pone.0077699-State2" target="_blank">[48]</a>.</p
China’s GDP growth under BAU, EEI, LC and ELC scenarios (Scenarios are defined in Table 2).
<p>China’s GDP growth under BAU, EEI, LC and ELC scenarios (Scenarios are defined in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0077699#pone-0077699-t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a>).</p
China’s energy intensity under BAU, EEI, LC and ELC scenarios. (Scenarios are defined in Table 2).
<p>China’s energy intensity under BAU, EEI, LC and ELC scenarios. (Scenarios are defined in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0077699#pone-0077699-t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a>).</p
China’s total energy consumption under BAU, EEI, LC and ELC scenarios. (Scenarios are defined in Table 2).
<p>China’s total energy consumption under BAU, EEI, LC and ELC scenarios. (Scenarios are defined in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0077699#pone-0077699-t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a>).</p
China’s energy-related CO<sub>2</sub> emissions under BAU, EEI, LC and ELC scenarios.
<p>(Scenarios are defined in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0077699#pone-0077699-t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a>).</p
Prediction result of scenario indicators (2007–2020).
c<p>Indexes definition: <i>P</i>, Population (<i>10<sup>8</sup> persons</i>); <i>G</i>, GDP (<i>10<sup>12</sup> yuan</i>); <i>A</i>, GDP per capita (<i>10<sup>4</sup> yuan</i>); <i>E</i>, Total energy consumption (10<sup>8</sup> tce); <i>I</i>, Energy intensity (<i>tce/10<sup>4</sup>yuan</i>); <i>C</i>, CO<sub>2</sub> emissions (<i>10<sup>8</sup> tons</i>); <i>c</i>, CO<sub>2</sub> emission intensity (<i>tC/10<sup>4</sup>yuan</i>).</p
Definitions of each variable in Eq. (1–3).
<p>Definitions of each variable in Eq. (1–3).</p
Ecological Network Analysis on Global Virtual Water Trade
Global water interdependencies are likely to increase
with growing
virtual water trade. To address the issues of the indirect effects
of water trade through the global economic circulation, we use ecological
network analysis (ENA) to shed insight into the complicated system
interactions. A global model of virtual water flow among agriculture
and livestock production trade in 1995–1999 is also built as
the basis for network analysis. Control analysis is used to identify
the quantitative control or dependency relations. The utility analysis
provides more indicators for describing the mutual relationship between
two regions/countries by imitating the interactions in the ecosystem
and distinguishes the beneficiary and the contributor of virtual water
trade system. Results show control and utility relations can well
depict the mutual relation in trade system, and direct observable
relations differ from integral ones with indirect interactions considered.
This paper offers a new way to depict the interrelations between trade
components and can serve as a meaningful start as we continue to use
ENA in providing more valuable implications for freshwater study on
a global scale
How Does Predation Affect the Bioaccumulation of Hydrophobic Organic Compounds in Aquatic Organisms?
It is well-known that the body burden
of hydrophobic organic compounds
(HOCs) increases with the trophic level of aquatic organisms. However,
the mechanism of HOC biomagnification is not fully understood. To
fill this gap, this study investigated the effect of predation on
the bioaccumulation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), one
type of HOC, in low-to-high aquatic trophic levels under constant
freely dissolved PAH concentrations (1, 5, or 10 μg L<sup>–1</sup>) maintained by passive dosing systems. The tested PAHs included
phenanthrene, anthracene, fluoranthene, and pyrene. The test organisms
included zebrafish, which prey on <i>Daphnia magna</i>,
and cichlids, which prey on zebrafish. The results revealed that for
both zebrafish and cichlids, predation elevated the uptake and elimination
rates of PAHs. The increase of uptake rate constant ranged from 20.8%
to 39.4% in zebrafish with the amount of predation of 5 daphnids per
fish per day, and the PAH uptake rate constant increased with the
amount of predation. However, predation did not change the final bioaccumulation
equilibrium; the equilibrium concentrations of PAHs in fish only depended
on the freely dissolved concentration in water. Furthermore, the lipid-normalized
water-based bioaccumulation factor of each PAH was constant for fish
at different trophic levels. These findings infer that the final bioaccumulation
equilibrium of PAHs is related to a partition between water and lipids
in aquatic organisms, and predation between trophic levels does not
change bioaccumulation equilibrium but bioaccumulation kinetics at
stable freely dissolved PAH concentrations. This study suggests that
if HOCs have not reached bioaccumulation equilibrium, biomagnification
occurs due to enhanced uptake rates caused by predation in addition
to higher lipid contents in higher trophic organisms. Otherwise, it
is only due to the higher lipid contents in higher trophic organisms
Environmental DNA Biomonitoring Reveals the Interactive Effects of Dams and Nutrient Enrichment on Aquatic Multitrophic Communities
Dam construction and nutrient enrichment are two pervasive
stressors
in rivers worldwide, which trigger a sharp decline in biodiversity
and ecosystem services. However, the interactive effects of both stressors
on multitrophic taxonomic groups remain largely unclear. Here, we
used the multitrophic datasets captured by the environmental DNA (eDNA)
approach to reveal the interactions between dams and nutrient enrichment
on aquatic communities from the aspects of taxonomic α diversity,
β diversity, and food webs. First, our data showed that dams
and nutrient enrichment jointly shaped a unique spatial pattern of
aquatic communities across the four river systems, and the dissimilarity
of community structure significantly declined (i.e., structural homogenization)
under both stressors. Second, dams and nutrients together explained
40–50% of the variations in aquatic communities, and dams had
a stronger impact on fish, aquatic insects, and bacteria, yet nutrients
had a stronger power to drive protozoa, fungi, and eukaryotic algae.
Finally, we found that additive, synergistic, and antagonistic interactions
of dams and nutrient enrichment were common and coexisted in river
systems and led to significantly simplified aquatic food webs, with
decreases in modularity (synergistic) and robustness (additive) and
an increase in coherence (synergistic). Overall, our study highlights
that eDNA-based datasets can provide multitrophic perspectives for
fostering the understanding of the interactive effects of multiple
stressors on rivers