24 research outputs found

    Correlations between subtype and clinicopathological parameters in 48 PMC patients<sup>$</sup>.

    No full text
    Correlations between subtype and clinicopathological parameters in 48 PMC patients$.</p

    Logistic regression analysis results of factors predicting LN metastasis.

    No full text
    <p>Logistic regression analysis results of factors predicting LN metastasis.</p

    Table_5_ADAMTS9-AS1 Constrains Breast Cancer Cell Invasion and Proliferation via Sequestering miR-301b-3p.xlsx

    No full text
    Objective: For determination of how ADAMTS9-AS1/miR-301b-3p/TGFBR2/JAK STAT signaling axis modulates progression of breast cancer cells.Methods: Target lncRNA was determined by differential analysis of breast cancer expression data and survival analysis. Differentially expressed miRNAs and target mRNAs that had binding sites with target lncRNA were predicted. GSEA software was used to carry out pathway enrichment analysis for mRNAs. Binding of the researched genes were tested with RNA binding protein immunoprecipitation (RIP). How miR-301b-3p bound TGFBR2 mRNA was tested by dual-luciferase method. Transwell, colony formation, EdU approaches were employed for verification of invasion and proliferation of breast cancer cells in each treatment group.Results: Markedly inactivated ADAMTS9-AS1 in breast cancer pertained to patient’s prognosis. MiR-301b-3p was capable of binding TGFBR2/ADAMTS9-AS1. However, overexpression of ADAMTS9-AS1 stimulated miR-301b-3p binding ADAMTS9-AS1 and repressed miR-301b-3p binding TGFBR2 mRNA. ADAMTS9-AS1 interference enhanced cancer proliferation and invasion, facilitated levels of KI67, PCNA, MMP-9 and MMP-2, and activated the JAK STAT signaling pathway. While silencing miR-301b-3p reversed the effect of ADAMTS9-AS1 interference. In addition, TGFBR2 interference or restraining JAK STAT signaling counteracted the effect of ADAMTS9-AS1.Conclusion: ADAMTS9-AS1 could sequester miR-301b-3p to inhibit progression of breast cancer via TGFBR2/JAK STAT pathway. This study supplies a rationale for incremental apprehension of ADAMTS9-AS1 in breast cancer progression.</p

    A 51-year-old woman with stage IIA pT2N0M0 PMC.

    No full text
    <p>Pathological diagnosis was made using H&E staining, which showed PMC—hypocellular variant, sparse nests or individual cells floating in a large amount of mucin, segmented by fibers. ER (3+), PR (3+), CerbB-2 (-). All images had an original magnification of ×40 and were H&E stained unless otherwise indicated. A (arrow) shows mucinous breast carcinoma. Abbreviations: H&E, hematoxylin and eosin; PMC, pure mucinous breast carcinoma; staging was performed according to the seventh edition of the TNM Classification for Breast Cancer.</p

    Clinical, histopathological and immunohistochemical findings of PMC in comparison with pMMC and mMMC<sup>¶</sup>.

    No full text
    <p>Clinical, histopathological and immunohistochemical findings of PMC in comparison with pMMC and mMMC<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0155132#t002fn001" target="_blank"><sup>¶</sup></a>.</p

    A 53-year-old woman with stage IIB pT3N0M0 MMC.

    No full text
    <p>Pathological diagnosis was determined by H&E staining and showed MMC—mucinous carcinoma mixed with invasive ductal breast carcinoma. ER (3+), PR (-), CerbB-2 (+). All images had an original magnification of ×40 and were H&E stained unless otherwise indicated. A (arrow) indicates invasive ductal breast carcinoma. B (arrow) indicates mucinous breast carcinoma. Abbreviations: H&E, hematoxylin and eosin; MMC, mixed mucinous breast carcinoma; staging according to the seventh edition of the TNM classification for breast cancer.</p

    Image_1_ADAMTS9-AS1 Constrains Breast Cancer Cell Invasion and Proliferation via Sequestering miR-301b-3p.TIF

    No full text
    Objective: For determination of how ADAMTS9-AS1/miR-301b-3p/TGFBR2/JAK STAT signaling axis modulates progression of breast cancer cells.Methods: Target lncRNA was determined by differential analysis of breast cancer expression data and survival analysis. Differentially expressed miRNAs and target mRNAs that had binding sites with target lncRNA were predicted. GSEA software was used to carry out pathway enrichment analysis for mRNAs. Binding of the researched genes were tested with RNA binding protein immunoprecipitation (RIP). How miR-301b-3p bound TGFBR2 mRNA was tested by dual-luciferase method. Transwell, colony formation, EdU approaches were employed for verification of invasion and proliferation of breast cancer cells in each treatment group.Results: Markedly inactivated ADAMTS9-AS1 in breast cancer pertained to patient’s prognosis. MiR-301b-3p was capable of binding TGFBR2/ADAMTS9-AS1. However, overexpression of ADAMTS9-AS1 stimulated miR-301b-3p binding ADAMTS9-AS1 and repressed miR-301b-3p binding TGFBR2 mRNA. ADAMTS9-AS1 interference enhanced cancer proliferation and invasion, facilitated levels of KI67, PCNA, MMP-9 and MMP-2, and activated the JAK STAT signaling pathway. While silencing miR-301b-3p reversed the effect of ADAMTS9-AS1 interference. In addition, TGFBR2 interference or restraining JAK STAT signaling counteracted the effect of ADAMTS9-AS1.Conclusion: ADAMTS9-AS1 could sequester miR-301b-3p to inhibit progression of breast cancer via TGFBR2/JAK STAT pathway. This study supplies a rationale for incremental apprehension of ADAMTS9-AS1 in breast cancer progression.</p

    Table_4_ADAMTS9-AS1 Constrains Breast Cancer Cell Invasion and Proliferation via Sequestering miR-301b-3p.xlsx

    No full text
    Objective: For determination of how ADAMTS9-AS1/miR-301b-3p/TGFBR2/JAK STAT signaling axis modulates progression of breast cancer cells.Methods: Target lncRNA was determined by differential analysis of breast cancer expression data and survival analysis. Differentially expressed miRNAs and target mRNAs that had binding sites with target lncRNA were predicted. GSEA software was used to carry out pathway enrichment analysis for mRNAs. Binding of the researched genes were tested with RNA binding protein immunoprecipitation (RIP). How miR-301b-3p bound TGFBR2 mRNA was tested by dual-luciferase method. Transwell, colony formation, EdU approaches were employed for verification of invasion and proliferation of breast cancer cells in each treatment group.Results: Markedly inactivated ADAMTS9-AS1 in breast cancer pertained to patient’s prognosis. MiR-301b-3p was capable of binding TGFBR2/ADAMTS9-AS1. However, overexpression of ADAMTS9-AS1 stimulated miR-301b-3p binding ADAMTS9-AS1 and repressed miR-301b-3p binding TGFBR2 mRNA. ADAMTS9-AS1 interference enhanced cancer proliferation and invasion, facilitated levels of KI67, PCNA, MMP-9 and MMP-2, and activated the JAK STAT signaling pathway. While silencing miR-301b-3p reversed the effect of ADAMTS9-AS1 interference. In addition, TGFBR2 interference or restraining JAK STAT signaling counteracted the effect of ADAMTS9-AS1.Conclusion: ADAMTS9-AS1 could sequester miR-301b-3p to inhibit progression of breast cancer via TGFBR2/JAK STAT pathway. This study supplies a rationale for incremental apprehension of ADAMTS9-AS1 in breast cancer progression.</p

    Image_2_ADAMTS9-AS1 Constrains Breast Cancer Cell Invasion and Proliferation via Sequestering miR-301b-3p.TIF

    No full text
    Objective: For determination of how ADAMTS9-AS1/miR-301b-3p/TGFBR2/JAK STAT signaling axis modulates progression of breast cancer cells.Methods: Target lncRNA was determined by differential analysis of breast cancer expression data and survival analysis. Differentially expressed miRNAs and target mRNAs that had binding sites with target lncRNA were predicted. GSEA software was used to carry out pathway enrichment analysis for mRNAs. Binding of the researched genes were tested with RNA binding protein immunoprecipitation (RIP). How miR-301b-3p bound TGFBR2 mRNA was tested by dual-luciferase method. Transwell, colony formation, EdU approaches were employed for verification of invasion and proliferation of breast cancer cells in each treatment group.Results: Markedly inactivated ADAMTS9-AS1 in breast cancer pertained to patient’s prognosis. MiR-301b-3p was capable of binding TGFBR2/ADAMTS9-AS1. However, overexpression of ADAMTS9-AS1 stimulated miR-301b-3p binding ADAMTS9-AS1 and repressed miR-301b-3p binding TGFBR2 mRNA. ADAMTS9-AS1 interference enhanced cancer proliferation and invasion, facilitated levels of KI67, PCNA, MMP-9 and MMP-2, and activated the JAK STAT signaling pathway. While silencing miR-301b-3p reversed the effect of ADAMTS9-AS1 interference. In addition, TGFBR2 interference or restraining JAK STAT signaling counteracted the effect of ADAMTS9-AS1.Conclusion: ADAMTS9-AS1 could sequester miR-301b-3p to inhibit progression of breast cancer via TGFBR2/JAK STAT pathway. This study supplies a rationale for incremental apprehension of ADAMTS9-AS1 in breast cancer progression.</p

    Table_2_ADAMTS9-AS1 Constrains Breast Cancer Cell Invasion and Proliferation via Sequestering miR-301b-3p.xlsx

    No full text
    Objective: For determination of how ADAMTS9-AS1/miR-301b-3p/TGFBR2/JAK STAT signaling axis modulates progression of breast cancer cells.Methods: Target lncRNA was determined by differential analysis of breast cancer expression data and survival analysis. Differentially expressed miRNAs and target mRNAs that had binding sites with target lncRNA were predicted. GSEA software was used to carry out pathway enrichment analysis for mRNAs. Binding of the researched genes were tested with RNA binding protein immunoprecipitation (RIP). How miR-301b-3p bound TGFBR2 mRNA was tested by dual-luciferase method. Transwell, colony formation, EdU approaches were employed for verification of invasion and proliferation of breast cancer cells in each treatment group.Results: Markedly inactivated ADAMTS9-AS1 in breast cancer pertained to patient’s prognosis. MiR-301b-3p was capable of binding TGFBR2/ADAMTS9-AS1. However, overexpression of ADAMTS9-AS1 stimulated miR-301b-3p binding ADAMTS9-AS1 and repressed miR-301b-3p binding TGFBR2 mRNA. ADAMTS9-AS1 interference enhanced cancer proliferation and invasion, facilitated levels of KI67, PCNA, MMP-9 and MMP-2, and activated the JAK STAT signaling pathway. While silencing miR-301b-3p reversed the effect of ADAMTS9-AS1 interference. In addition, TGFBR2 interference or restraining JAK STAT signaling counteracted the effect of ADAMTS9-AS1.Conclusion: ADAMTS9-AS1 could sequester miR-301b-3p to inhibit progression of breast cancer via TGFBR2/JAK STAT pathway. This study supplies a rationale for incremental apprehension of ADAMTS9-AS1 in breast cancer progression.</p
    corecore