8,085 research outputs found

    Study of scalar meson a_0(1450) from B \to a_0(1450)K^* Decays

    Full text link
    In the two-quark model supposition for the meson a0(1450)a_0(1450), which can be viewed as either the first excited state (scenario I) or the lowest lying state (scenario II), the branching ratios and the direct CP-violating asymmetries for decays Bβˆ’β†’a00(1450)Kβˆ—βˆ’,a0βˆ’(1450)Kβˆ—0B^-\to a^{0}_0(1450)K^{*-}, a^{-}_0(1450)K^{*0} and BΛ‰0β†’a0+(1450)Kβˆ—βˆ’,a00(1450)KΛ‰βˆ—0\bar B^0\to a^{+}_0(1450)K^{*-}, a^{0}_0(1450)\bar K^{*0} are studied by employing the perturbative QCD factorization approach. We find the following results: (a) For the decays Bβˆ’β†’a0βˆ’(1450)Kβˆ—0,BΛ‰0β†’a0+(1450)Kβˆ—βˆ’,a00(1450)KΛ‰βˆ—0B^-\to a^{-}_0(1450)K^{*0}, \bar B^0\to a^{+}_0(1450)K^{*-}, a^{0}_0(1450)\bar K^{*0}, their branching ratios in scenario II are larger than those in scenario I about one order. So it is easy for the experiments to differentiate between the scenario I and II for the meson a0(1450)a_0(1450). (b)For the decay Bβˆ’β†’a00(1450)Kβˆ—βˆ’B^-\to a^{0}_0(1450)K^{*-}, due to not receiving the enhancement from the Kβˆ—βˆ’K^*-emission factorizable diagrams, its penguin operator contributions are the smallest in scenario II, which makes its branching ratio drop into the order of 10βˆ’610^{-6}. Even so, its branching ratio in scenario II is still larger than that in scenario I about 2.5 times. (c) Even though our predictions are much larger than those from the QCD factorization results, they are still consistent with each other within the large theoretical errors from the annihilation diagrams. (d) We predict the direct CP- violating asymmetry of the decay Bβˆ’β†’a0βˆ’(1450)Kβˆ—0B^-\to a^{-}_0(1450)K^{*0} is small and only a few percent.Comment: 15 Pages, 5 Figure

    Perturbative QCD for B_s \to a_1(1260)(b_1(1235))P(V) Decays

    Full text link
    Within the framework of perturbative QCD approach, we study the charmless two-body decays Bsβ†’a1(1260)(b1(1235))P(V)B_s \to a_1(1260)(b_1(1235))P(V) (P,VP, V represent the light pseudo-scalar and vector mesons, respectively.). Using the decays constants and the light-cone distribution amplitudes for these mesons derived from the QCD sum rule method, we find the following results: (a) The decays BΛ‰s0β†’a1βˆ’K+(Kβˆ—+)\bar B^0_s\to a^{-}_1K^{+}(K^{*+}) have the contributions from the factorization emission diagrams with a large Wilson coefficient C2+C1/3C_2+C_1/3 (order of 1), so they have the largest branching ratios and arrive at 10βˆ’510^{-5} order. While for the decays BΛ‰s0β†’a10K0(Kβˆ—0)\bar B^0_s\to a^{0}_1 K^{0}(K^{*0}), the Wilson coefficient is C1+C2/3C_1+C_2/3 in tree level and color suppressed, so their branching ratios are small and fall in the order of 10βˆ’7∼10βˆ’810^{-7}\sim10^{-8}. For the decays BΛ‰s0β†’b1K(Kβˆ—)\bar B^0_s\to b_1K(K^*), all of their branching ratios are of order few times 10βˆ’610^{-6}. (b) For the pure annihilation type decays BΛ‰s0β†’a1(b1)ρ\bar B^0_s\to a_1(b_1)\rho except the decays BΛ‰s0β†’a1Ο€\bar B^0_s\to a_1\pi having large branching ratios of order few times 10βˆ’610^{-6}, the most other decays have the branching ratios of 10βˆ’710^{-7} order. The branching ratios of the decays BΛ‰s0β†’a10(b10)Ο‰\bar B^0_s\to a^0_1(b^0_1)\omega are the smallest and fall in the order of 10βˆ’8∼10βˆ’910^{-8}\sim10^{-9}. (c)The branching ratios and the direct CP-asymmetries of decays BΛ‰s0β†’a10(b10)Ξ·(β€²)\bar B^0_s\to a^0_1(b_1^0)\eta^{(\prime)} are very sensitive to take different Gegenbauer moments for Ξ·(β€²)\eta^{(\prime)}. (d) Except for the decays BΛ‰s0β†’a10Kβˆ—0,a10Ο‰,b10Ο‰\bar B^0_s\to a^{0}_1 K^{*0}, a^{0}_1\omega, b^{0}_1\omega, the longitudinal polarization fractions of other BΛ‰s0β†’a1(b1)V\bar B^0_s\to a_1(b_1)V decays are very large and more than 90%. (e) Compared with decays BΛ‰s0β†’a1(b1)P\bar B^0_s\to a_1(b_1)P, most of BΛ‰s0β†’a1(b1)V\bar B^0_s\to a_1(b_1)V decays have smaller direct CP asymmetries.Comment: 17 pages, 5 figure

    Study of scalar meson f_0(980) and K_0^*(1430) from B \to f_0(980)\rho(\omega, \phi) and B \to K^*_0(1430)\rho(\omega) Decays

    Full text link
    In the two-quark model supposition for f0(980)f_0(980) and K0βˆ—(1430)K_0^{*}(1430), the branching ratios and the direct CP-violating asymmetries for decays BΛ‰0β†’f0(980)ρ0(Ο‰,Ο•),K0βˆ—0(1430)ρ0(Ο‰),K0βˆ—βˆ’(1430)ρ+\bar{B}^0\to f_0(980)\rho^0(\omega,\phi), K^{*0}_0(1430)\rho^0(\omega), K^{*-}_0(1430)\rho^+ and Bβˆ’β†’f0(980)Οβˆ’,K0βˆ—0(1430)Οβˆ’,K0βˆ—βˆ’(1430)ρ0(Ο‰)B^-\to f_0(980)\rho^-, K^{*0}_0(1430)\rho^-, K^{*-}_0(1430)\rho^0(\omega) are studied by employing the perturbative QCD (PQCD)factorization approach. we find the following results: (a) if the scalar meson f0(980)f_0(980) is viewed as a mixture of ssΛ‰s\bar s and (uuΛ‰+ddΛ‰)/2(u\bar u+d\bar d)/\sqrt{2}, the branching ratios of the decays BΛ‰0β†’f0(980)ρ0(Ο‰,Ο•)\bar{B}^0\to f_0(980)\rho^0(\omega,\phi) and Bβˆ’β†’f0(980)Οβˆ’B^-\to f_0(980)\rho^-, which are induced by bβ†’db\to d transition, are smaller than the currently experimental upper limits, and the predictions for the decay BΛ‰0β†’f0(980)Ο‰,Bβˆ’β†’f0(980)Οβˆ’\bar{B}^0\to f_0(980)\omega, B^-\to f_0(980)\rho^- are not far away from their limits; (b) in the decays Bβ†’K0βˆ—(1430)ρ(Ο‰)B\to K^*_0(1430)\rho(\omega), which are induced by bβ†’sb\to s transition, the branch ratio of BΛ‰0β†’K0βˆ—0(1430)ρ0\bar B^0\to K^{*0}_0(1430)\rho^0 is the smallest one in two scenarios, at the order of 10βˆ’710^{-7} for scenario I, about 4.8Γ—10βˆ’64.8\times10^{-6} for scenario II; (c) the direct CP-asymmetries of the decays Bβ†’f0(980)ρ(Ο‰)B\to f_0(980)\rho(\omega) have a strong dependent on the mixing angle ΞΈ\theta: they are large in the range of 25∘<ΞΈ<40∘25^\circ<\theta<40^\circ, and small in the range of 140∘<ΞΈ<165∘140^\circ<\theta<165^\circ, while the direct CP-asymmetries of the decays Bβ†’K0βˆ—(1430)ρ(Ο‰)B\to K^{*}_0(1430)\rho(\omega) are not large in both scenarios and most of them are less than 20% in size.Comment: 17 pages, 5 figures, minor corrections, typos removed, accepted for publication in Phys. Rev.

    The decays B→Ψ(2S)π(K),ηc(2S)π(K)B\to \Psi(2S)\pi(K),\eta_c(2S)\pi(K) in the pQCD approach beyond the leading-order

    Full text link
    Two body BB meson decays involving the radially excited meson ψ(2S)/Ξ·c(2S)\psi(2S)/\eta_c(2S) in the final states are studied by using the perturbative QCD (pQCD) approach. We find that: (a) The branching ratios for the decays involving KK meson are predicted as Br(B+β†’Οˆ(2S)K+)=(5.37βˆ’2.22+1.85)Γ—10βˆ’4,Br(B0β†’Οˆ(2S)K0)=(4.98βˆ’2.06+1.71)Γ—10βˆ’4,Br(B+β†’Ξ·c(2S)K+)=(3.54βˆ’3.09+3.18)Γ—10βˆ’4Br(B^+\to\psi(2S)K^+)=(5.37^{+1.85}_{-2.22})\times10^{-4}, Br(B^0\to\psi(2S)K^0)=(4.98^{+1.71}_{-2.06})\times10^{-4}, Br(B^+\to\eta_c(2S)K^+)=(3.54^{+3.18}_{-3.09})\times10^{-4}, which are consistent well with the present data when including the next-to-leading-order (NLO) effects. Here the NLO effects are from the vertex corrections and the NLO Wilson coefficients. The large errors in the decay B+β†’Ξ·c(2S)K+B^+\to\eta_c(2S)K^+ are mainly induced by using the decay constant fΞ·c(2S)=0.243βˆ’0.111+0.079f_{\eta_c(2S)}=0.243^{+0.079}_{-0.111} GeV with large uncertainties. (b) While there seems to be some room left for other higher order corrections or the non-perturbative long distance contributions in the decays involving Ο€\pi meson, Br(B+β†’Οˆ(2S)Ο€+)=(1.17βˆ’0.50+0.42)Γ—10βˆ’5,Br(B0β†’Οˆ(2S)Ο€0)=0.54βˆ’0.23+0.20Γ—10βˆ’5Br(B^+\to\psi(2S)\pi^+)=(1.17^{+0.42}_{-0.50})\times10^{-5}, Br(B^0\to\psi(2S)\pi^0)=0.54^{+0.20}_{-0.23}\times10^{-5}, which are smaller than the present data. The results for other decays can be tested at the running LHCb and forthcoming Super-B experiments. (c) There is no obvious evidence of the direct CP violation being seen in the decays Bβ†’Οˆ(2S)Ο€(K),Ξ·c(2S)Ο€(K)B\to \psi(2S)\pi(K), \eta_c(2S)\pi(K) in the present experiments, which is supported by our calculations. If a few percent value is confirmed in the future , it would indicate new physics definitely.Comment: 11 pages, 3 figures. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1705.0052

    Three body radiative decay Bs→ϕKˉ0γB_s\to \phi \bar K^0 \gamma in the PQCD approach

    Full text link
    We study the three body radiative decay Bsβ†’Ο•KΛ‰0Ξ³B_s\to \phi \bar K^0 \gamma by introducing the Ο•K\phi K pair distribution amplitudes (DAs) in the perturbative QCD approach. This nonperturbative inputs, the two meson DAs, is very important to simplify the calculations. Besides the dominant electromagnetic penguin operator O7Ξ³O_{7\gamma}, the subleading contributions from chromomagnetic penguin operator O8gO_{8g}, quark-loop corrections and annihilation type amplitudes are also considered. We find that the branching ratio for the decay Bsβ†’Ο•KΛ‰0Ξ³B_s\to \phi \bar K^0 \gamma is about (9.26βˆ’1.61βˆ’3.86βˆ’0.49+1.79+3.12+0.64)Γ—10βˆ’8(9.26^{+1.79+3.12+0.64}_{-1.61-3.86-0.49})\times10^{-8}, which is much smaller compared with that for the decay B0β†’Ο•K0Ξ³B^0\to \phi K^0\gamma. It is mainly because that the former decay induces by bβ†’dΞ³b\to d\gamma with small CKM matrix element being proportional to Ξ»3\lambda^3. The prediction for the direct CP asymmetry is ACPdir(Bsβ†’Ο•KΛ‰0Ξ³)=(βˆ’4.1βˆ’0.6βˆ’1.2βˆ’0.1+0.4+1.7+0.2)%A^{dir}_{CP}(B_s\to \phi \bar K^0 \gamma)=(-4.1^{+0.4+1.7+0.2}_{-0.6-1.2-0.1})\%, which is well consistent with the result from the U-spin symmetry approach. we also predict the Bsβ†’Ο•KΛ‰0Ξ³B_s \to\phi \bar K^0\gamma decay spectrum, which exhibits a maximu at the Ο•K\phi K invariant masss around 1.95 GeV.Comment: 17 pages,6 figures, Accepted for publication in EPJ

    B\to K_1\pi(K) decays in the perturbative QCD approach

    Full text link
    Within the framework of the perturbative QCD approach, we study the two-body charmless decays Bβ†’K1(1270)(K1(1400))Ο€(K)B\to K_1(1270)(K_1(1400))\pi(K). We find the following results: (i) The decays BΛ‰0β†’K1(1270)+Ο€βˆ’,K1(1400)+Ο€βˆ’\bar B^0\to K_1(1270)^+\pi^-, K_1(1400)^+\pi^- are incompatible with the present experimental data. There exists a similar situation for the decays BΛ‰0β†’a1(1260)+Kβˆ’,b1(1235)+Kβˆ’\bar B^0\to a_1(1260)^+K^-, b_1(1235)^+K^-, which are usually considered that the nonperturbative contributions are needed to explain the data. But the difference is that the nonperturbative contributions seem to play opposite roles in these two groups of decays.(ii) The pure annihilation type decays BΛ‰0β†’K1Β±(1270)Kβˆ“,K1Β±(1400)Kβˆ“\bar B^0\to K_1^{\pm}(1270)K^{\mp}, K_1^{\pm}(1400)K^{\mp} are good channels to test whether an approach can be used to calculate correctly the strength of the penguin-annihilation amplitudes. Their branching ratios are predicted at 10βˆ’710^{-7} order, which are larger than the QCDF results. (iii) The dependence of the direct CP-violating asymmetries of these decays on the mixing angle ΞΈK1\theta_{K_1} are also considered.Comment: 18 pages, 4 figure
    • …
    corecore