13 research outputs found

    Relationship among sympathetic nerve activity at 2 min before defecation, symptoms, and quality of life.

    No full text
    Sympathetic nerve activity was evaluated by the sum of Δlow frequency/high frequency (LF/HF). (a) Intensity of abdominal pain, (b) satisfaction levels of defecation, (c) gastrointestinal symptom rating scale (GSRS) diarrhea score, (d) GSRS constipation score, (e) the Japanese version of the 8-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-8) role physical, and (f) the SF-8 role emotional score were significantly correlated with the sum of ΔLF/HF at 2 min before defecation. Data were analyzed by Spearman test.</p

    Autonomic nervous activities before and after defecation.

    No full text
    (a, b) Changes in sympathetic nerve activities before and after defecation were evaluated by the sum of Δlow frequency/high frequency (LF/HF) and the sum of LF/HF, respectively. (c, d) Changes in parasympathetic nerve activities before and after defecation were evaluated by the sum of ΔHF and the sum of HF, respectively. Data represents the median. Statistical significance was calculated by Mann–Whitney test (*p < 0.05).</p

    T-shirt-type wearable device and smartphone application software.

    No full text
    Heart rate variability (HRV) was measured using a T-shirt wearable device attached to a transmitter in front of the T-shirt. The HRV data were transferred and recorded on a smartphone using Bluetooth. At the same time, life events, such as abdominal symptoms, defecation, eating, and awakening or sleep, were recorded in real time using a smartphone application software during HRV recording.</p

    The graph of obtained data and measuring method of ANS activity.

    No full text
    (a) The real graph of obtained data about autonomic nervous system (ANS) activity and life events. The results of low frequency (LF) (yellow line) and high frequency (HF) (green line) represented in a graph. Life events, such as defecation and eating (the enclosed area with orange line) and period with positive symptoms (the enclosed area with pink line), were recorded. (b) Measuring method of ANS activity. The baseline LF/HF was defined as the value included in the range of the mean ± 2 standard deviations (dashed line) of LF/HF measured in the period with no symptoms. The sum of LF/HF was the area under the curve of LF/HF measured in the period with positive symptoms (upward diagonal). The sum of ΔLF/HF was the sum of variation from the mean value of baseline measured in the period with positive symptoms (dots). The maximum variation of ΔLF/HF indicated the maximum variation from the mean value of baseline measured in the period with positive symptoms (arrow). HF was analyzed in the same way.</p

    Hypothesized mechanism of exacerbated symptoms and increased sympathetic nerve activity before defecation.

    No full text
    The stress of abdominal pain activates the amygdala to release corticotrophin-releasing hormone (CRH), resulting in further exacerbation of abdominal pain by increasing colonic motility. These cascades “exacerbate the circle of pain.” Two minutes before defecation, the stress also activates sympathetic nerves as a stress response against abdominal pain. Increased sympathetic nerve activity can decrease colonic motility, which may have a protective role to hold back the defecation. This situation may be under competition between the accelerator of colonic motility caused by CRH and the brake caused by sympathetic nerve activation.</p

    What Kind of Capsule Endoscope Is Suitable for a Controllable Self-Propelling Capsule Endoscope? Experimental Study Using a Porcine Stomach Model for Clinical Application (with Videos)

    No full text
    <div><p>Background</p><p>We have been developing the Self-Propelling Capsule Endoscope (SPCE) that allows for controllability from outside of the body and real-time observation. What kind of capsule endoscope (CE) is suitable for a controllable SPCE is unclear and a very critical point for clinical application. We compared observing ability of three kinds of SPCEs with different viewing angles and frame rates.</p><p>Methods</p><p>Eleven buttons were sewed in an excised porcine stomach. Four examiners controlled the SPCE using PillCamSB2, -ESO2, and -COLON2 (Given Imaging Ltd., Israel), for 10 minutes each with the aim of detecting as many buttons and examining them as closely as possible. The ability to find lesions was assessed based on the number of detected buttons. The SPCE-performance score (SPS) was used to evaluate the ability to examine the lesions in detail.</p><p>Results</p><p>The SPCE-ESO2, -COLON2, and -SB2 detected 11 [interquartile range (IQR): 0], 10.5 (IQR, 0.5), and 8 (IQR, 1.0) buttons, respectively. The SPCE-ESO2 and -COLON2 had a significantly better ability to detect lesions than the -SB2 (p < 0.05). The SPCE-ESO2, -COLON2, and -SB2 had significantly different SPS values of 22 (IQR, 0), 16.5 (IQR, 1.5), and 14 (IQR, 1.0), respectively (p < 0.05 for all comparisons; SPCE-SB2 vs. -ESO2, -SB2 vs. -COLON2, and -ESO2 vs. -COLON2).</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>PillCamESO2 is most suitable in different three CEs for SPCE for examining lesions in detail of the stomach.</p></div
    corecore