sj-pdf-1-smm-10.1177_09622802221080753 - Supplemental material for A Bayesian phase I/II biomarker-based design for identifying subgroup-specific optimal dose for immunotherapy

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-smm-10.1177_09622802221080753 for A Bayesian phase I/II biomarker-based design for identifying subgroup-specific optimal dose for immunotherapy by Beibei Guo and Yong Zang in Statistical Methods in Medical Research</p

Supplemental material for A Bayesian adaptive phase II clinical trial design accounting for spatial variation

Supplemental material for A Bayesian adaptive phase II clinical trial design accounting for spatial variation by Beibei Guo and Yong Zang in Statistical Methods in Medical Research</p

Characterization of Proteoform Post-Translational Modifications by Top-Down and Bottom-Up Mass Spectrometry in Conjunction with Annotations

Many proteoforms can be produced from a gene due to genetic mutations, alternative splicing, post-translational modifications (PTMs), and other variations. PTMs in proteoforms play critical roles in cell signaling, protein degradation, and other biological processes. Mass spectrometry (MS) is the primary technique for investigating PTMs in proteoforms, and two alternative MS approaches, top-down and bottom-up, have complementary strengths. The combination of the two approaches has the potential to increase the sensitivity and accuracy in PTM identification and characterization. In addition, protein and PTM knowledge bases, such as UniProt, provide valuable information for PTM characterization and verification. Here, we present a software pipeline PTM-TBA (PTM characterization by Top-down and Bottom-up MS and Annotations) for identifying and localizing PTMs in proteoforms by integrating top-down and bottom-up MS as well as PTM annotations. We assessed PTM-TBA using a technical triplicate of bottom-up and top-down MS data of SW480 cells. On average, database search of the top-down MS data identified 2000 mass shifts, 814.5 (40.7%) of which were matched to 11 common PTMs and 423 of which were localized. Of the mass shifts identified by top-down MS, PTM-TBA verified 435 mass shifts using the bottom-up MS data and UniProt annotations

Characterization of Proteoform Post-Translational Modifications by Top-Down and Bottom-Up Mass Spectrometry in Conjunction with Annotations

Many proteoforms can be produced from a gene due to genetic mutations, alternative splicing, post-translational modifications (PTMs), and other variations. PTMs in proteoforms play critical roles in cell signaling, protein degradation, and other biological processes. Mass spectrometry (MS) is the primary technique for investigating PTMs in proteoforms, and two alternative MS approaches, top-down and bottom-up, have complementary strengths. The combination of the two approaches has the potential to increase the sensitivity and accuracy in PTM identification and characterization. In addition, protein and PTM knowledge bases, such as UniProt, provide valuable information for PTM characterization and verification. Here, we present a software pipeline PTM-TBA (PTM characterization by Top-down and Bottom-up MS and Annotations) for identifying and localizing PTMs in proteoforms by integrating top-down and bottom-up MS as well as PTM annotations. We assessed PTM-TBA using a technical triplicate of bottom-up and top-down MS data of SW480 cells. On average, database search of the top-down MS data identified 2000 mass shifts, 814.5 (40.7%) of which were matched to 11 common PTMs and 423 of which were localized. Of the mass shifts identified by top-down MS, PTM-TBA verified 435 mass shifts using the bottom-up MS data and UniProt annotations

Characterization of Proteoform Post-Translational Modifications by Top-Down and Bottom-Up Mass Spectrometry in Conjunction with Annotations

Many proteoforms can be produced from a gene due to genetic mutations, alternative splicing, post-translational modifications (PTMs), and other variations. PTMs in proteoforms play critical roles in cell signaling, protein degradation, and other biological processes. Mass spectrometry (MS) is the primary technique for investigating PTMs in proteoforms, and two alternative MS approaches, top-down and bottom-up, have complementary strengths. The combination of the two approaches has the potential to increase the sensitivity and accuracy in PTM identification and characterization. In addition, protein and PTM knowledge bases, such as UniProt, provide valuable information for PTM characterization and verification. Here, we present a software pipeline PTM-TBA (PTM characterization by Top-down and Bottom-up MS and Annotations) for identifying and localizing PTMs in proteoforms by integrating top-down and bottom-up MS as well as PTM annotations. We assessed PTM-TBA using a technical triplicate of bottom-up and top-down MS data of SW480 cells. On average, database search of the top-down MS data identified 2000 mass shifts, 814.5 (40.7%) of which were matched to 11 common PTMs and 423 of which were localized. Of the mass shifts identified by top-down MS, PTM-TBA verified 435 mass shifts using the bottom-up MS data and UniProt annotations

Characterization of Proteoform Post-Translational Modifications by Top-Down and Bottom-Up Mass Spectrometry in Conjunction with Annotations

Many proteoforms can be produced from a gene due to genetic mutations, alternative splicing, post-translational modifications (PTMs), and other variations. PTMs in proteoforms play critical roles in cell signaling, protein degradation, and other biological processes. Mass spectrometry (MS) is the primary technique for investigating PTMs in proteoforms, and two alternative MS approaches, top-down and bottom-up, have complementary strengths. The combination of the two approaches has the potential to increase the sensitivity and accuracy in PTM identification and characterization. In addition, protein and PTM knowledge bases, such as UniProt, provide valuable information for PTM characterization and verification. Here, we present a software pipeline PTM-TBA (PTM characterization by Top-down and Bottom-up MS and Annotations) for identifying and localizing PTMs in proteoforms by integrating top-down and bottom-up MS as well as PTM annotations. We assessed PTM-TBA using a technical triplicate of bottom-up and top-down MS data of SW480 cells. On average, database search of the top-down MS data identified 2000 mass shifts, 814.5 (40.7%) of which were matched to 11 common PTMs and 423 of which were localized. Of the mass shifts identified by top-down MS, PTM-TBA verified 435 mass shifts using the bottom-up MS data and UniProt annotations

TopFD: A Proteoform Feature Detection Tool for Top–Down Proteomics

Top-down liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) analyzes intact proteoforms and generates mass spectra containing peaks of proteoforms with various isotopic compositions, charge states, and retention times. An essential step in top-down MS data analysis is proteoform feature detection, which aims to group these peaks into peak sets (features), each containing all peaks of a proteoform. Accurate protein feature detection enhances the accuracy in MS-based proteoform identification and quantification. Here, we present TopFD, a software tool for top-down MS feature detection that integrates algorithms for proteoform feature detection, feature boundary refinement, and machine learning models for proteoform feature evaluation. We performed extensive benchmarking of TopFD, ProMex, FlashDeconv, and Xtract using seven top-down MS data sets and demonstrated that TopFD outperforms other tools in feature accuracy, reproducibility, and feature abundance reproducibility

Characterization of Proteoform Post-Translational Modifications by Top-Down and Bottom-Up Mass Spectrometry in Conjunction with Annotations

Many proteoforms can be produced from a gene due to genetic mutations, alternative splicing, post-translational modifications (PTMs), and other variations. PTMs in proteoforms play critical roles in cell signaling, protein degradation, and other biological processes. Mass spectrometry (MS) is the primary technique for investigating PTMs in proteoforms, and two alternative MS approaches, top-down and bottom-up, have complementary strengths. The combination of the two approaches has the potential to increase the sensitivity and accuracy in PTM identification and characterization. In addition, protein and PTM knowledge bases, such as UniProt, provide valuable information for PTM characterization and verification. Here, we present a software pipeline PTM-TBA (PTM characterization by Top-down and Bottom-up MS and Annotations) for identifying and localizing PTMs in proteoforms by integrating top-down and bottom-up MS as well as PTM annotations. We assessed PTM-TBA using a technical triplicate of bottom-up and top-down MS data of SW480 cells. On average, database search of the top-down MS data identified 2000 mass shifts, 814.5 (40.7%) of which were matched to 11 common PTMs and 423 of which were localized. Of the mass shifts identified by top-down MS, PTM-TBA verified 435 mass shifts using the bottom-up MS data and UniProt annotations

sj-pdf-1-smm-10.1177_09622802231215801 - Supplemental material for A Bayesian adaptive biomarker stratified phase II randomized clinical trial design for radiotherapies with competing risk survival outcomes

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-smm-10.1177_09622802231215801 for A Bayesian adaptive biomarker stratified phase II randomized clinical trial design for radiotherapies with competing risk survival outcomes by Jina Park, Wenjing Hu, Ick Hoon Jin, Hao Liu and Yong Zang in Statistical Methods in Medical Research</p

Evaluation of Machine Learning Models for Proteoform Retention and Migration Time Prediction in Top-Down Mass Spectrometry

Reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RPLC) and capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) are two primary proteoform separation methods in mass spectrometry (MS)-based top-down proteomics. Proteoform retention time (RT) prediction in RPLC and migration time (MT) prediction in CZE provide additional information for accurate proteoform identification and quantification. While existing methods are mainly focused on peptide RT and MT prediction in bottom-up MS, there is still a lack of methods for proteoform RT and MT prediction in top-down MS. We systematically evaluated eight machine learning models and a transfer learning method for proteoform RT prediction and five models and the transfer learning method for proteoform MT prediction. Experimental results showed that a gated recurrent unit (GRU)-based model with transfer learning achieved a high accuracy (R = 0.978) for proteoform RT prediction and that the GRU-based model and a fully connected neural network model obtained a high accuracy of R = 0.982 and 0.981 for proteoform MT prediction, respectively