Supplemental Material for Jiang, Schmidt, and Reif, 2018.

Figure S1 shows the prediction accuracies of GBLUP, EGBLUP, LEGBLUP and HGBLUP for simulated traits with heritability 0.5 and σ²_a/σ²_aa = 4:3. <br><br>Figure S2 shows the prediction accuracies of the four models for simulated traits with heritability 0.7 and σ²_a/σ²_aa = 3:1. <br><br>Table S1 provides the prediction accuracies of the four models for the 26 agronomic traits in the rice data set. <br><br>File S1 contains the R code used to generate the data for the simulation study. <br><br>File S2 and S3 contain sample genomic and physical map data sets for running the code

Table1_Identification of differentially expressed genes at the single-cell level and prognosis prediction through bulk RNA sequencing data in breast cancer.XLSX

Background: The invention and development of single-cell technologies have contributed a lot to the understanding of tumor heterogeneity. The objective of this research was to investigate the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between normal and tumor cells at the single-cell level and explore the clinical application of these genes with bulk RNA-sequencing data in breast cancer.Methods: We collected single-cell, bulk RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and microarray data from two public databases. Through single-cell analysis of 23,909 mammary gland cells from seven healthy donors and 33,138 tumor cells from seven breast cancer patients, cell type-specific DEGs between normal and tumor cells were identified. With these genes and the bulk RNA-seq data, we developed a prognostic signature and validated the efficacy in two independent cohorts. We also explored the differences of immune infiltration and tumor mutational burden (TMB) between the different risk groups.Results: A total of 6,175 cell-type-specific DEGs were obtained through the single-cell analysis between normal and tumor cells in breast cancer, of which 1,768 genes intersected with the bulk RNA-seq data. An 18-gene signature was constructed to assess the outcomes in breast cancer patients. The efficacy of the signature was notably prominent in two independent cohorts. The low-risk group showed higher immune infiltration and lower TMB. Among the 18 genes in the signature, 16 were also differentially expressed in the bulk RNA-seq dataset.Conclusion: Cell-type-specific DEGs between normal and tumor cells were identified through single-cell transcriptome data. The signature constructed with these DEGs could stratify patients efficiently. The signature was also closely correlated with immune infiltration and TMB. Nearly all the genes in the signature were also differentially expressed at the bulk RNA-seq level.</p

Table4_Identification of differentially expressed genes at the single-cell level and prognosis prediction through bulk RNA sequencing data in breast cancer.XLSX

Background: The invention and development of single-cell technologies have contributed a lot to the understanding of tumor heterogeneity. The objective of this research was to investigate the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between normal and tumor cells at the single-cell level and explore the clinical application of these genes with bulk RNA-sequencing data in breast cancer.Methods: We collected single-cell, bulk RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and microarray data from two public databases. Through single-cell analysis of 23,909 mammary gland cells from seven healthy donors and 33,138 tumor cells from seven breast cancer patients, cell type-specific DEGs between normal and tumor cells were identified. With these genes and the bulk RNA-seq data, we developed a prognostic signature and validated the efficacy in two independent cohorts. We also explored the differences of immune infiltration and tumor mutational burden (TMB) between the different risk groups.Results: A total of 6,175 cell-type-specific DEGs were obtained through the single-cell analysis between normal and tumor cells in breast cancer, of which 1,768 genes intersected with the bulk RNA-seq data. An 18-gene signature was constructed to assess the outcomes in breast cancer patients. The efficacy of the signature was notably prominent in two independent cohorts. The low-risk group showed higher immune infiltration and lower TMB. Among the 18 genes in the signature, 16 were also differentially expressed in the bulk RNA-seq dataset.Conclusion: Cell-type-specific DEGs between normal and tumor cells were identified through single-cell transcriptome data. The signature constructed with these DEGs could stratify patients efficiently. The signature was also closely correlated with immune infiltration and TMB. Nearly all the genes in the signature were also differentially expressed at the bulk RNA-seq level.</p

Table3_Identification of differentially expressed genes at the single-cell level and prognosis prediction through bulk RNA sequencing data in breast cancer.XLSX

Background: The invention and development of single-cell technologies have contributed a lot to the understanding of tumor heterogeneity. The objective of this research was to investigate the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between normal and tumor cells at the single-cell level and explore the clinical application of these genes with bulk RNA-sequencing data in breast cancer.Methods: We collected single-cell, bulk RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and microarray data from two public databases. Through single-cell analysis of 23,909 mammary gland cells from seven healthy donors and 33,138 tumor cells from seven breast cancer patients, cell type-specific DEGs between normal and tumor cells were identified. With these genes and the bulk RNA-seq data, we developed a prognostic signature and validated the efficacy in two independent cohorts. We also explored the differences of immune infiltration and tumor mutational burden (TMB) between the different risk groups.Results: A total of 6,175 cell-type-specific DEGs were obtained through the single-cell analysis between normal and tumor cells in breast cancer, of which 1,768 genes intersected with the bulk RNA-seq data. An 18-gene signature was constructed to assess the outcomes in breast cancer patients. The efficacy of the signature was notably prominent in two independent cohorts. The low-risk group showed higher immune infiltration and lower TMB. Among the 18 genes in the signature, 16 were also differentially expressed in the bulk RNA-seq dataset.Conclusion: Cell-type-specific DEGs between normal and tumor cells were identified through single-cell transcriptome data. The signature constructed with these DEGs could stratify patients efficiently. The signature was also closely correlated with immune infiltration and TMB. Nearly all the genes in the signature were also differentially expressed at the bulk RNA-seq level.</p

Image1_Identification of differentially expressed genes at the single-cell level and prognosis prediction through bulk RNA sequencing data in breast cancer.TIF

Background: The invention and development of single-cell technologies have contributed a lot to the understanding of tumor heterogeneity. The objective of this research was to investigate the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between normal and tumor cells at the single-cell level and explore the clinical application of these genes with bulk RNA-sequencing data in breast cancer.Methods: We collected single-cell, bulk RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and microarray data from two public databases. Through single-cell analysis of 23,909 mammary gland cells from seven healthy donors and 33,138 tumor cells from seven breast cancer patients, cell type-specific DEGs between normal and tumor cells were identified. With these genes and the bulk RNA-seq data, we developed a prognostic signature and validated the efficacy in two independent cohorts. We also explored the differences of immune infiltration and tumor mutational burden (TMB) between the different risk groups.Results: A total of 6,175 cell-type-specific DEGs were obtained through the single-cell analysis between normal and tumor cells in breast cancer, of which 1,768 genes intersected with the bulk RNA-seq data. An 18-gene signature was constructed to assess the outcomes in breast cancer patients. The efficacy of the signature was notably prominent in two independent cohorts. The low-risk group showed higher immune infiltration and lower TMB. Among the 18 genes in the signature, 16 were also differentially expressed in the bulk RNA-seq dataset.Conclusion: Cell-type-specific DEGs between normal and tumor cells were identified through single-cell transcriptome data. The signature constructed with these DEGs could stratify patients efficiently. The signature was also closely correlated with immune infiltration and TMB. Nearly all the genes in the signature were also differentially expressed at the bulk RNA-seq level.</p

Table2_Identification of differentially expressed genes at the single-cell level and prognosis prediction through bulk RNA sequencing data in breast cancer.XLSX

Background: The invention and development of single-cell technologies have contributed a lot to the understanding of tumor heterogeneity. The objective of this research was to investigate the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between normal and tumor cells at the single-cell level and explore the clinical application of these genes with bulk RNA-sequencing data in breast cancer.Methods: We collected single-cell, bulk RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and microarray data from two public databases. Through single-cell analysis of 23,909 mammary gland cells from seven healthy donors and 33,138 tumor cells from seven breast cancer patients, cell type-specific DEGs between normal and tumor cells were identified. With these genes and the bulk RNA-seq data, we developed a prognostic signature and validated the efficacy in two independent cohorts. We also explored the differences of immune infiltration and tumor mutational burden (TMB) between the different risk groups.Results: A total of 6,175 cell-type-specific DEGs were obtained through the single-cell analysis between normal and tumor cells in breast cancer, of which 1,768 genes intersected with the bulk RNA-seq data. An 18-gene signature was constructed to assess the outcomes in breast cancer patients. The efficacy of the signature was notably prominent in two independent cohorts. The low-risk group showed higher immune infiltration and lower TMB. Among the 18 genes in the signature, 16 were also differentially expressed in the bulk RNA-seq dataset.Conclusion: Cell-type-specific DEGs between normal and tumor cells were identified through single-cell transcriptome data. The signature constructed with these DEGs could stratify patients efficiently. The signature was also closely correlated with immune infiltration and TMB. Nearly all the genes in the signature were also differentially expressed at the bulk RNA-seq level.</p

Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma patients with bile duct tumor thrombus after hepatic resection or liver transplantation in Asian populations: A meta-analysis

<div><p>Background</p><p>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with bile duct tumor thrombus (BDTT) in the clinic is rare, and surgical treatment is currently considered the most effective treatment. However, the influence of BDTT on the prognosis of HCC patients who underwent surgery remains controversial in previous studies. Therefore, this paper uses meta-analysis method to elucidate this controversy.</p><p>Methods</p><p>In this study, we conducted a literature search on databases PubMed, Embase and Web of Science from inception until September 2016. Each study was evaluated with Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The pooled effect was calculated, and the association between BDTT and overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS) was reevaluated using meta-analysis for hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).</p><p>Results</p><p>A total of 11 studies was included containing 5295 patients. The (HR) for OS and DFS was 3.21 and 1.81, 95%CI was 2.34–4.39 and 1.17–2.78 respectively.</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>The results showed that HCC patients with BDTT had a worse prognosis than those without BDTT after hepatic resection or liver transplantation (LT).</p></div

Image2_Identification of differentially expressed genes at the single-cell level and prognosis prediction through bulk RNA sequencing data in breast cancer.TIF

Background: The invention and development of single-cell technologies have contributed a lot to the understanding of tumor heterogeneity. The objective of this research was to investigate the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between normal and tumor cells at the single-cell level and explore the clinical application of these genes with bulk RNA-sequencing data in breast cancer.Methods: We collected single-cell, bulk RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and microarray data from two public databases. Through single-cell analysis of 23,909 mammary gland cells from seven healthy donors and 33,138 tumor cells from seven breast cancer patients, cell type-specific DEGs between normal and tumor cells were identified. With these genes and the bulk RNA-seq data, we developed a prognostic signature and validated the efficacy in two independent cohorts. We also explored the differences of immune infiltration and tumor mutational burden (TMB) between the different risk groups.Results: A total of 6,175 cell-type-specific DEGs were obtained through the single-cell analysis between normal and tumor cells in breast cancer, of which 1,768 genes intersected with the bulk RNA-seq data. An 18-gene signature was constructed to assess the outcomes in breast cancer patients. The efficacy of the signature was notably prominent in two independent cohorts. The low-risk group showed higher immune infiltration and lower TMB. Among the 18 genes in the signature, 16 were also differentially expressed in the bulk RNA-seq dataset.Conclusion: Cell-type-specific DEGs between normal and tumor cells were identified through single-cell transcriptome data. The signature constructed with these DEGs could stratify patients efficiently. The signature was also closely correlated with immune infiltration and TMB. Nearly all the genes in the signature were also differentially expressed at the bulk RNA-seq level.</p

The Relationship between Oxygen Permeability and Phase Separation Morphology of the Multicomponent Silicone Hydrogels

In this article, the multicomponent copolymers were prepared by the copolymerization of two hydrophobic silicon-containing monomers bis­(trimethylsilyloxy) methylsilylpropyl glycerol methacrylate (SiMA) and tris­(trimethylsiloxy)-3-methacryloxypropylsilane (TRIS) with three hydrophilic monomers 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate, <i>N</i>-vinylpyrrolidone, and <i>N</i>,<i>N</i>-dimethyl acrylamide. The copolymers were hydrated to form transparent silicone hydrogels. The oxygen permeability coefficients (Dk) of hydrogels were measured, and their relationships with the equilibrium water contents (EWC) and the types and contents of silicon containing monomers as well as the phase separation structures of silicone hydrogels were analyzed in detail. The results showed that the EWC decreased as the increase of SiMA content. The relationship between Dk and SiMA content, as well as that between Dk and EWC, showed inverted bell curve distributions, which meant two main factors, i.e., silicon–oxygen bond in silicone and water in hydrogel, contributed to oxygen permeation and followed a mutual inhibition competition mechanism. The internal morphologies of the hydrogels were observed by transmission electron microscope, and the results showed that the hydrogels presented two different phase separation structures depending on the types of the silicon-containing monomers. The silicone phase in SiMA containing hydrogel presented to be a granular texture, while the silicone phase in TRIS containing hydrogel formed a fibrous texture which resulted in a higher Dk value. These results could help to design a silicone hydrogel with better properties and wider application

Sensitivity analysis for the evaluation of heterogeneity.

<p>Sensitivity analysis for the evaluation of heterogeneity.</p