12 research outputs found
Facile Synthesis of Ultrasmall SnO<sub>2</sub>/Sn Nanoparticles Grown on the N‑Doped Carbon Framework as a Long-Life Anode Material
The development of SnO2-based negative materials
possessing
a long cyclic life is troubled by their huge volume change in the
Li+ insertion and detachment process. In our study, the
SnO2/Sn/NC composite was successfully prepared by an uncomplicated
and controllable route. The ultrasmall SnO2/Sn nanoparticles
are fixed on the N-doped carbon framework, which prominently alleviate
its vast volume variation and improve its electrochemical reaction
kinetics. The above-mentioned feature of SnO2/Sn/NC endows
it with an exceptional cyclic lifespan and good rate capability. When
employed as the negative electrode for the Li-ion battery at 1.0 A
g–1, it releases a competent discharge capacity
of 344 mAh g–1 at the 995th cycle. New dawn would
be brought by the investigation of the synthesis and utilization of
Sn-based compounds
Figure S3 from Combination of Metformin and Gefitinib as First-Line Therapy for Nondiabetic Advanced NSCLC Patients with EGFR Mutations: A Randomized, Double-Blind Phase II Trial
Impact of the IL-6 cutoff level on progression-free survival (A) and overall survival (B).</p
Figure S2 from Combination of Metformin and Gefitinib as First-Line Therapy for Nondiabetic Advanced NSCLC Patients with EGFR Mutations: A Randomized, Double-Blind Phase II Trial
Kaplan-Meier analyses of PFS for patients with normal and elevated ({greater than or equal to}7 pg/ml) baseline IL-6 levels.</p
Figure S1 from Combination of Metformin and Gefitinib as First-Line Therapy for Nondiabetic Advanced NSCLC Patients with EGFR Mutations: A Randomized, Double-Blind Phase II Trial
Kaplan-Meier curves for progression-free survival in subgroups.</p
Figure S4 from Combination of Metformin and Gefitinib as First-Line Therapy for Nondiabetic Advanced NSCLC Patients with EGFR Mutations: A Randomized, Double-Blind Phase II Trial
Dynamics of IL-6 levels in the two treatment groups at different time points (A) and comparison of the IL-6 levels between the two arms at each time point (B).</p
SRSF1 is required for tumorigenecity of SCLC.
(a) and (b): DMS114 cells were transfected with non-targeting control or SRSF1-directed siRNAs for 48 hrs, then treated with cisplatin (2.5ug/ml) or topotecan (2.5ug/ml) for 24 hrs. Cell growth (a) and Caspase-3/7 activities (b) were assessed and normalized against non-targeting ctrl siRNA-transfected cells as 100% control. (c): DMS114 cells were transfected with non-targeting and SRSF1 siRNAs for 48 hrs and then seeded in sphere forming media and allowed to grow for 4 days. Phase-contrast images of the sphere formation under each condition were captured and viable cell mass quantitated by CTG assay. (d): Reconstitution of SRSF1 expression using a siRNA-resistant Flag-tagged SRSF1 expression construct was carried out in SRSF1 siRNA transfected cells. Impact on sphere growth rate was assessed by CTG assay, and successful SRSF1 protein re-expression was confirmed using either anti-SRSF1 antibody or anti-Flag antibody. (e) DMS114 cells transfected with non-targeting control siRNA or SRSF1 siRNA were implanted into immunocompromised mice and tumor formation rates were monitored and measured as described in Materials and Methods.</p
Genomic Landscape Survey Identifies <i>SRSF1</i> as a Key Oncodriver in Small Cell Lung Cancer
<div><p>Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive disease with poor survival. A few sequencing studies performed on limited number of samples have revealed potential disease-driving genes in SCLC, however, much still remains unknown, particularly in the Asian patient population. Here we conducted whole exome sequencing (WES) and transcriptomic sequencing of primary tumors from 99 Chinese SCLC patients. Dysregulation of tumor suppressor genes <i>TP53</i> and <i>RB1</i> was observed in 82% and 62% of SCLC patients, respectively, and more than half of the SCLC patients (62%) harbored <i>TP53</i> and <i>RB1</i> mutation and/or copy number loss. Additionally, Serine/Arginine Splicing Factor 1 (<i>SRSF1</i>) DNA copy number gain and mRNA over-expression was strongly associated with poor survival using both discovery and validation patient cohorts. Functional studies <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> demonstrate that SRSF1 is important for tumorigenicity of SCLC and may play a key role in DNA repair and chemo-sensitivity. These results strongly support SRSF1 as a prognostic biomarker in SCLC and provide a rationale for personalized therapy in SCLC.</p></div
Mechanism of action for SRSF1 in SCLC.
a) SRSF1 prevents DNA-damage. DMS114 cells were transfected with control or SRSF1 siRNA and then treated with topotecan or Cisplatin for the indicated times. SRSF1, phosphor-H2AX and phosphor-Chk2 were probed with their corresponding antibodies. b) c) SRSF1 mediates the activation of AKT and ERK pathways. DMS114 cells transfected with ctrl or SRSF1 siRNAs were lysed and applied to the phospho-kinase array as detailed in Materials and Methods. The dot blot result was further confirmed by western blot in both DMS114 and NCI-H1048 cells.</p
Mutations in <i>CDH10</i> associate with poor survival in Chinese SCLC patients.
<p>a) Schematic representation of amino acid consequences from mutations identified in SCLC patients in human CDH10 protein b) Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves comparing survival between patients harboring at least one nonsilent mutation in <i>CDH10</i> (n = 12) and those not (n = 84).p* = log-rank test; p = Cox PH regression model; HR = hazard ratio</p
<i>SRSF1</i> CN gain and mRNA expression correlates with survival.
<p>A: The time-to-event analysis schema with available patient specimens. In the time-to-event analyses, 96 Chinese primary SCLC patients with clinical outcome were divided into training and test cohorts according to the availabilities of matched normal, RNAseq and survival outcome information. The training set includes 22 patients with each patient having tumor and normal WES data and survival outcome. The test set includes 74 patient tumors only. Each patient has WES data from tumor and survival outcome. Among those patients, 48 patients have WES, RNAseq data, and survival outcome. <b>b</b>) <i>SRSF1</i> mRNA expression in CN gain group and no CN gain group (p = Welch’s t-test). <b>c</b>) Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves comparing survival between <i>SRSF1</i> low and high mRNA expression groups (n = 48). Similarly, KM curves used to evaluate the difference of survival between different <i>SRSF1</i> CN statuses in <b>d)</b> discovery set (n = 22), <b>e</b>) validation set (n = 74), and <b>f</b>) combination of discovery set and validation set (n = 96). p* = log-rank test; p = Cox PH regression model; HR = hazard ratio.</p
