201 research outputs found

    Parking functions on toppling matrices

    Full text link
    Let Δ\Delta be an integer n×nn \times n-matrix which satisfies the conditions: detΔ0\det \Delta\neq 0, Δij0 for ij,\Delta_{ij}\leq 0\text{ for }i\neq j, and there exists a vector r=(r1,,rn)>0{\bf r}=(r_1,\ldots,r_n)>0 such that rΔ0{\bf r}\Delta \geq 0. Here the notation r>0{\bf r}> 0 means that ri>0r_i>0 for all ii, and rr{\bf r}\geq {\bf r}' means that ririr_i\geq r'_i for every ii. Let R(Δ)\mathscr{R}(\Delta) be the set of vectors r{\bf r} such that r>0{\bf r}>0 and rΔ0{\bf r}\Delta\geq 0. In this paper, (Δ,r)(\Delta,{\bf r})-parking functions are defined for any rR(Δ){\bf r}\in\mathscr{R}(\Delta). It is proved that the set of (Δ,r)(\Delta,{\bf r})-parking functions is independent of r{\bf r} for any rR(Δ){\bf r}\in\mathscr{R}(\Delta). For this reason, (Δ,r)(\Delta,{\bf r})-parking functions are simply called Δ\Delta-parking functions. It is shown that the number of Δ\Delta-parking functions is less than or equal to the determinant of Δ\Delta. Moreover, the definition of (Δ,r)(\Delta,{\bf r})-recurrent configurations are given for any rR(Δ){\bf r}\in\mathscr{R}(\Delta). It is proved that the set of (Δ,r)(\Delta,{\bf r})-recurrent configurations is independent of r{\bf r} for any rR(Δ){\bf r}\in\mathscr{R}(\Delta). Hence, (Δ,r)(\Delta,{\bf r})-recurrent configurations are simply called Δ\Delta-recurrent configurations. It is obtained that the number of Δ\Delta-recurrent configurations is larger than or equal to the determinant of Δ\Delta. A simple bijection from Δ\Delta-parking functions to Δ\Delta-recurrent configurations is established. It follows from this bijection that the number of Δ\Delta-parking functions and the number of Δ\Delta-recurrent configurations are both equal to the determinant of Δ\Delta
    corecore