27 research outputs found
Epiregulin (EPR) and amphiregulin (AR) inhibited cell death in Neuro2a cells.
<p>The cells were pretreated with EPR (0.01, 0.03, 0.1, and 1 nM) and AR (0.001, 0.01, 0.03, 0.1, and 1 nM) for 1 h and subsequently treated according to the indicated conditions. (A) EPR reduced the release of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) at 48 h after Tm (1 μg/mL) treatment. (B) AR reduced the release of LDH at 48 h after Tm (1 μg/mL) treatment. The LDH released into the medium was expressed as a percentage of the control value. The data represent the average of 4 independent experiments for each sample. *p < 0.05.</p
Stress-Induced Neuroprotective Effects of Epiregulin and Amphiregulin
<div><p>Members of the epidermal growth factor family play important roles in the regulation of cell growth, proliferation, and survival. However, the specific roles of each epidermal growth factor family member with respect to brain injury are not well understood. Gene chip assay screens have revealed drastic increases in the expression of the epidermal growth factor family members amphiregulin and epiregulin following lipopolysaccharide stimulation, which activates an immune response. Both immune activity and endoplasmic reticulum stress are activated during cerebral ischemia. We found that the expression levels of amphiregulin and epiregulin were significantly increased under conditions of cerebral ischemia. Because endoplasmic reticulum stress increased the expression of amphiregulin and epiregulin in glial cells, endoplasmic reticulum stress may be a key mediatory factor of pathophysiological activity. Recombinant epiregulin and amphiregulin proteins effectively inhibited endoplasmic reticulum stress and the subsequent induction of neuronal cell death. Therefore, the upregulation of the epidermal growth factor family members epiregulin and amphiregulin may play a critical role in preventing endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced cell death, thus providing a potential therapy for brain injury.</p></div
Characteristics of Male and Female subjects sorted by 5-HTTLPR genotypes.
<p>HIT, responding to Go stimuli. CER: Commission error rate, responding to NoGo stimuli. OER: Omission error rate, not responding to Go stimuli</p><p>Characteristics of Male and Female subjects sorted by 5-HTTLPR genotypes.</p
Epiregulin (EPR) and amphiregulin (AR) inhibited cell death in Neuro2a cells.
<p>The cells were pretreated with EPR (0.01, 0.03, 0.1, and 1 nM) and AR (0.001, 0.01, 0.03, 0.1, and 1 nM) for 1 h and subsequently treated according to the indicated conditions. (A) EPR reduced the release of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) at 48 h after Tm (1 μg/mL) treatment. (B) AR reduced the release of LDH at 48 h after Tm (1 μg/mL) treatment. The LDH released into the medium was expressed as a percentage of the control value. The data represent the average of 4 independent experiments for each sample. *p < 0.05.</p
Fold changes in EGF family member expression following LPS stimulation.
<p>Fold changes in EGF family member expression following LPS stimulation.</p
Epiregulin (EPR) and amphiregulin (AR) inhibited endoplasmic reticulum stress in Neuro2a cells.
<p>Neuro2a cells were pre-incubated with (A) EPR or (B) AR for 1 h and then treated with tunicamycin (Tm) for 24 h. GRP78 and CHOP expression was detected via western blotting. Protein quantification is expressed as the mean ± standard error of 3 independent experiments. *p < 0.05 compared with the Tm-treated group.</p
Commission error rates in the “Nogo” conditions.
<p>Mean (± standard error) commission error rates (%) under two “Nogo” conditions for each of the two allele groups (s/s and s/l). P-Nogo: “punishment Nogo” conditions, where participants were punished for pushing the button in response to a “Nogo” stimulus; R-Nogo: “reward Nogo” conditions, where participants were rewarded for withholding responses to a “Nogo” stimulus. *<i>p</i> < 0.05.</p
Fold changes in pro-inflammatory cytokines expression following LPS stimulation.
<p>Fold changes in pro-inflammatory cytokines expression following LPS stimulation.</p
Induction of epiregulin (EPR) and amphiregulin (AR) mRNA expression in primary glial cells following lipopolysaccharide (LPS) treatment (time course and dose course).
<p>(A) Total RNA was isolated from cells exposed to LPS (1 μg/ml) for the indicated time periods and subjected to RT-PCR. (B) Total RNA was isolated from cells exposed to LPS (4 h) at the indicated concentrations and subjected to RT-PCR. Data are presented as the means ± standard errors from 3 separate experiments. *p < 0.05 compared with the control.</p
Induction of epiregulin (EPR) and amphiregulin (AR) mRNA expression in primary glial cells following Tm treatment.
<p>Total RNA was isolated from cells exposed to Tm (3 μg/ml) for the indicated periods and subjected to RT-PCR. Data are presented as the means ± standard errors from 3 separate experiments. *p < 0.05 compared with the control.</p