11 research outputs found

    Supplemental Dataset 2

    No full text
    “Informative” Genes Obtained from PSOL-based ML Analysis for Gene Co-expression Network Construction under Six Studied Stresses in Two Tissue

    Supplemental Dataset 5

    No full text
    Detailed Information for Gene Ontology (GO) Modules Enriched with Salt Stress-related Gene

    Classification of TARs based on physical location relative to the predicted genes

    No full text
    Pie charts showing percentage of all identified TARs in different genome components relative to the predicted gene structures in barrel medic and soybean. Number of non-exonic TARs in different sub-genic regions in barrel medic and soybean.<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Transcriptional analysis of highly syntenic regions between and using tiling microarrays"</p><p>http://genomebiology.com/2008/9/3/R57</p><p>Genome Biology 2008;9(3):R57-R57.</p><p>Published online 19 Mar 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2397509.</p><p></p

    Tiling microarray detection of the predicted genes in the 1 Mb region syntenic between barrel medic and soybean

    No full text
    Pie charts showing the number and percentage of genes detected by tiling arrays in at least one of the six examined organ types. Tiling array detection rates of predicted genes in the six organ types in barrel medic and soybean.<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Transcriptional analysis of highly syntenic regions between and using tiling microarrays"</p><p>http://genomebiology.com/2008/9/3/R57</p><p>Genome Biology 2008;9(3):R57-R57.</p><p>Published online 19 Mar 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2397509.</p><p></p

    Summary of characterization of non-exonic TARs in <i>japonica</i> rice.

    No full text
    <p>Transcription of the non-exonic TARs was determined by the re-array. The non-exonic TARs were linked to various putative functional or structural elements of the rice genome based on current annotations. Number of non-exonic TARs corresponding to each group of functional elements was extrapolated to the full genome based on experimental confirmation rates where applicable and the physical sizes of the annotated regions relative to that of the genome.</p>1<p>This number excludes 13,666 TARs intersecting with annotated exons.</p>2<p>Transcription levels exhibiting a Pearson correlation coefficient <−0.4;</p>3<p>Redundant with expressed antisense transcripts and not included in the total.</p

    Figure 6

    No full text
    <p>Analysis of non-coding intergenic TARs. (A) Scatterplot of GC2 versus GC3 in all gene models (n = 46,976), FL-cDNA-supported PASA gene models (n = 11,494), and intergenic TARs (n = 5256). The intergenic TARs were distal (>1Kb) to a gene model excluding those with a hit in the ProSite database. (B) Overlapping TARs with putative non-coding transcripts. A 5-Kb region represented by the high-resolution tiling array is shown. The interrogating probes are aligned to the chromosomal coordinates, with the fluorescence intensity value depicted as a vertical line. Gene models, no-exonic TARs and putative non-coding transcripts are depicted as horizontal arrows, which point to the direction of transcription. A portion of the region containing four non-coding transcripts and a pair of TARs is enlarged and shown at the bottom. (C) Predicted secondary structure of the TAR Chr10fwd_10524178. The sequence corresponding to the putative nc-RNA ts_342 is highlighted.</p
    corecore