Hybrid social positions of 30 most cited DJs.

This figure is a magnified cut-out of the upper right quadrant of Fig 2. The name-tagged DJs are well-known representatives of each musical style.</p

Distribution of DJs by social positions.

The axes are the social position variables. We take the log on both social position variables: Betweenness Centrality and Clustering Coefficient. The red lines are the medians of both variables.</p

Negative binomial regressions predicting the number of citations per track _t+1 (CEM sample).

Negative binomial regressions predicting the number of citations per track t+1 (CEM sample).</p

Location of 30 most cited DJs in the citation network.

The figure is an enlargement of the central part of Fig 4. The name-tagged DJs are the same as in Fig 3.</p

Approximate numbers of visitor and performing DJs at the selected festivals.

Approximate numbers of visitor and performing DJs at the selected festivals.</p

Genre distribution of detected groups.

A total of 6 groups are detected using the fast greedy optimization algorithm: Group 1 (blue/Progressive House), Group 2 (orange/Dubstep, Drum, & Bass), Group 3 (green/Electro House), Group 4 (pink/Trance), Group 5 (brown/Techno, Tech House) and Group 6 (yellow/Hardcore, Hard Dance).</p

The data for the negative binomial fixed-effects regression model.

(CSV)</p

Negative binomial regressions predicting the number of citations per track _t+1.

Negative binomial regressions predicting the number of citations per track t+1.</p

Descriptive statistics of variables.

(N = 288,491). (DOCX)</p

Construction of the DJ citation network.

Construction of the DJ citation network.</p