8 research outputs found
Facile Synthesis of Surface-Modified Nanosized 뱉Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> as Efficient Visible Photocatalysts and Mechanism Insight
In this study, α-Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> nanoparticles
with high visible photocatalytic activity for degrading liquid-phase
phenol and gas-phase acetaldehyde have been controllably synthesized
by a simple one-pot water-organic two-phase separated hydrolysis-solvothermal
(HST) method. Further, the visible photocatalytic activity is enhanced
greatly after modification with a proper amount of phosphate. The
enhanced activity is attributed to the increased charge separation
by promoting photogenerated electrons captured by the adsorbed O<sub>2</sub> by means of the atmosphere-controlled surface photovoltage
spectra, along with the photoelectrochemical IâV curves. On
the basis of the O<sub>2</sub> temperature-programmed desorption measurements,
it is suggested for the first time that the promotion effect results
from the increase in the amount of O<sub>2</sub> adsorbed on the surfaces
of Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> by the partial substitution of âFeâOH
with âFeâOâPâOH surface ends. Expectedly,
the positive strategy would be also applicable to other visible-response
nanosized oxides as efficient photocatalysts. This work will provide
us with a feasible route to synthesize oxide-based nanomaterials with
good photocatalytic performance
Flow chart of articles identified, included and exclude.
<p>Flow chart of articles identified, included and exclude.</p
Reporting of checklists for ARRIVE Guidelines.
<p>Reporting of checklists for ARRIVE Guidelines.</p
The number of included SRs MAs on acupuncture.
<p>The number of included SRs MAs on acupuncture.</p
Characteristics of included studies.
<p>Characteristics of included studies.</p
Flow chart of articles identified, included and excluded.
<p>Flow chart of articles identified, included and excluded.</p
Characteristics of included studies.
<p>* Reported both âsystematic reviewâ and âmeta-analysisâ.</p><p>Characteristics of included studies.</p
The comparison for Reporting of checklists for SRs/MAs on PRISMA statement.
$<p>nâ=â169,</p>#<p>nâ=â260,</p>&<p>nâ=â157.</p><p>*: there were statistical differences compared with non-SCI journals/>2009 y and SCI journals/2009 y, respectively.</p><p>The comparison for Reporting of checklists for SRs/MAs on PRISMA statement.</p