144 research outputs found

    Replies

    Get PDF
    This paper responds to the contributions by Alexander Bird, Nathan Wildman, David Yates, Jennifer McKitrick, Giacomo Giannini & Matthew Tugby, and Jennifer Wang. I react to their comments on my 2015 book Potentiality: From Dispositions to Modality, and in doing so expands on some of the arguments and ideas of the book

    Adaptive abilities

    Get PDF
    Abilities, in contrast to mere dispositions, propensities, or tendencies, abilities seem to be features of agents that put the agent herself in control. But what is the distinguishing feature of abilities vis-à-vis other kinds of powers? Our aim in this paper is to point, in answer to this question, to a crucial feature of abilities that existing accounts have tended to neglect: their adaptivity. Adaptivity is a feature of how abilities are exercised. The main reason for its relative neglect has been that most extant accounts have focused solely on whether abilities are exercised successfully in certain possible situations and have mostly understood the exercise of an ability in terms of complete successful performance. We begin by pointing out two aspects of abilities with regard to which current accounts seem (at best) incomplete: control and exercise. We then introduce adaptivity as we understand it, and end by putting it to work in developing a fuller understanding of abilities that does better than current accounts

    On Linking Dispositions and Which Conditionals?

    Get PDF

    A plenitude of powers

    Get PDF

    Williamsonian modal epistemology, possibility-based

    Get PDF

    Dispositions without Conditionals

    Get PDF

    Recent Work: Modality without Possible Worlds

    Get PDF

    Möglichkeit ohne mögliche Welten

    Get PDF

    Essence, Potentiality, and Modality

    Get PDF
    • …
    corecore