18 research outputs found
AMOVA analysis of differences in diversity of endophytic bacteria in different host plant species.
AMOVA analysis of differences in diversity of endophytic bacteria in different host plant species.</p
Variation of relative abundances of dominant bacterial groups with the host plant species and sampling months.
<p>Relative abundances of the dominant phyla in the leaf endophytic bacterial communities from different host plants (A); Relative abundances of the dominant bacterial genera across different host plant species (B) and across different sampling months (C).</p
AMOVA analysis of differences in diversity of endophytic bacteria in different.
<p>sampling months.</p
LEfSe analysis identification of biomarker microbes for endophytic bacterial communities for different host plant species.
<p>LEfSe analysis identification of biomarker microbes for endophytic bacterial communities for different host plant species.</p
LEfSe analysis identification of biomarker microbes for endophytic bacterial communities for different months of sample collection.
<p>LEfSe analysis identification of biomarker microbes for endophytic bacterial communities for different months of sample collection.</p
Standard curves and graphs generated using 10-fold diluted genomic DNA and genomic DNA mixed with orange rind extract or insect crude DNA.
<p>A1/A2, A3/A4 & A5/A6: Graphs/standard curve generated using primer and probe set Xf.CVC.fim1 with genomic DNA, genomic DNA mixed with orange rind extract and genomic DNA mixed with insect crude DNA, respectively; B1/B2, B3/B4 & B5/B6: Graphs/standard curve generated using primer/ probe set Xf.CVC.pib4 with genomic DNA, genomic DNA mixed with orange rind extract and genomic DNA mixed with insect crude DNA, respectively; C1/C2, C3/C4 & C5/C6: Graphs/standard curve generated using primer/ probe set Xf.csp6 with genomic DNA, genomic DNA mixed with orange rind extract and genomic DNA mixed with insect crude DNA, respectively.</p
Razor Ex BioDetection system graph obtained after amplification of plasmid DNA (carrying the target gene sequence of corresponding primer set) and <i>Xylella fastidiosa</i> subsp. <i>pauca</i> genomic DNA (CVC50031) using primer and probe sets Xf.CVC.fim1, Xf.CVC.pib4 and Xf.csp6.
<p>A1, B1 and C1 are positive controls with estimated Ct values of 23, 26 and 20 for primer/probe sets Xf.CVC.fim1, Xf.CVC.pib4 and Xf.csp6, respectively. <i>X. fastidiosa</i> genomic DNA tested in two replicates with primer/probe sets Xf.CVC.fim1 (A2 & A3), Xf.CVC.pib4 (B2 & B3) and Xf.csp6 (C2 & C3) with estimated Ct value of 24, 24 and 20, respectively. N shows the non-template controls (water) for each primer/probe set. </p
Standard graph showing 10-fold serial dilutions of plasmid DNA (carrying the target gene sequence of corresponding primer set) using primer and probe sets.
<p>Xf.CVC.fim1 (A), Xf.CVC.pib4 (B), and Xf.csp6 (C). R2 = linear correlation; Ex = reaction efficiency; Y = slope.</p
Graph from the Razor Ex BioDetection system after amplification of plasmid DNA (carrying the target gene sequence of corresponding primer set) and <i>Xylella fastidiosa</i> infected grape and oak plant samples (two samples for each plant), using the primer and probe set Xf.csp6.
<p>A: positive controls; estimated Ct value 24; B: <i>X. fastidiosa</i> infected grape (sample G1 and G2) and oak (sample O1 and O2) genomic DNA; estimated Ct values 33-35; N: non-template control (water). Each reaction was performed in two replicates. </p
Bar code generated to upload the fast PCR cycling program for detection of <i>Xylella fastidiosa</i> and <i>Xylella fastidiosa</i> subsp. <i>pauca</i> in Razor Ex BioDetection system.
<p>Bar code generated to upload the fast PCR cycling program for detection of <i>Xylella fastidiosa</i> and <i>Xylella fastidiosa</i> subsp. <i>pauca</i> in Razor Ex BioDetection system.</p