31 research outputs found

    Infinitely many cyclic solutions to the Hamilton-Waterloo problem with odd length cycles

    Full text link
    It is conjectured that for every pair (ℓ,m)(\ell,m) of odd integers greater than 2 with m≡1  (modℓ)m \equiv 1\; \pmod{\ell}, there exists a cyclic two-factorization of KℓmK_{\ell m} having exactly (m−1)/2(m-1)/2 factors of type ℓm\ell^m and all the others of type mℓm^{\ell}. The authors prove the conjecture in the affirmative when ℓ≡1  (mod4)\ell \equiv 1\; \pmod{4} and m≥ℓ2−ℓ+1m \geq \ell^2 -\ell + 1.Comment: 31 page

    A constructive solution to the Oberwolfach Problem with a large cycle

    Full text link
    For every 22-regular graph FF of order vv, the Oberwolfach problem OP(F)OP(F) asks whether there is a 22-factorization of KvK_v (vv odd) or KvK_v minus a 11-factor (vv even) into copies of FF. Posed by Ringel in 1967 and extensively studied ever since, this problem is still open. In this paper we construct solutions to OP(F)OP(F) whenever FF contains a cycle of length greater than an explicit lower bound. Our constructions combine the amalgamation-detachment technique with methods aimed at building 22-factorizations with an automorphism group having a nearly-regular action on the vertex-set.Comment: 11 page

    On the full automorphism group of a Hamiltonian cycle system of odd order

    Full text link
    It is shown that a necessary condition for an abstract group G to be the full automorphism group of a Hamiltonian cycle system is that G has odd order or it is either binary, or the affine linear group AGL(1; p) with p prime. We show that this condition is also sufficient except possibly for the class of non-solvable binary groups.Comment: 11 pages, 2 figure

    Constructing generalized Heffter arrays via near alternating sign matrices

    Full text link
    Let SS be a subset of a group GG (not necessarily abelian) such that S ∩−SS\,\cap -S is empty or contains only elements of order 22, and let h=(h1,…,hm)∈Nm\mathbf{h}=(h_1,\ldots, h_m)\in \mathbb{N}^m and k=(k1,…,kn)∈Nn\mathbf{k}=(k_1, \ldots, k_n)\in \mathbb{N}^n. A generalized Heffter array GHASλ(m,n;h,k)^{\lambda}_S(m, n; \mathbf{h}, \mathbf{k}) over GG is an m×nm\times n matrix A=(aij)A=(a_{ij}) such that: the ii-th row (resp. jj-th column) of AA contains exactly hih_i (resp. kjk_j) nonzero elements, and the list {aij,−aij∣aij≠0}\{a_{ij}, -a_{ij}\mid a_{ij}\neq 0\} equals λ\lambda times the set S ∪ −SS\,\cup\, -S. We speak of a zero sum (resp. nonzero sum) GHA if each row and each column of AA sums to zero (resp. a nonzero element), with respect to some ordering. In this paper, we use near alternating sign matrices to build both zero and nonzero sum GHAs, over cyclic groups, having the further strong property of being simple. In particular, we construct zero sum and simple GHAs whose row and column weights are congruent to 00 modulo 44. This result also provides the first infinite family of simple (classic) Heffter arrays to be rectangular (m≠nm\neq n) and with less than nn nonzero entries in each row. Furthermore, we build nonzero sum GHASλ(m,n;h,k)^{\lambda}_S(m, n; \mathbf{h}, \mathbf{k}) over an arbitrary group GG whenever SS contains enough noninvolutions, thus extending previous nonconstructive results where ±S=G∖H\pm S = G\setminus H for some subgroup HH~of~GG. Finally, we describe how GHAs can be used to build orthogonal decompositions and biembeddings of Cayley graphs (over groups not necessarily abelian) onto orientable surfaces.Comment: 29 pages, 1 figur

    Vertex-regular 11-factorizations in infinite graphs

    Full text link
    The existence of 11-factorizations of an infinite complete equipartite graph Km[n]K_m[n] (with mm parts of size nn) admitting a vertex-regular automorphism group GG is known only when n=1n=1 and mm is countable (that is, for countable complete graphs) and, in addition, GG is a finitely generated abelian group GG of order mm. In this paper, we show that a vertex-regular 11-factorization of Km[n]K_m[n] under the group GG exists if and only if GG has a subgroup HH of order nn whose index in GG is mm. Furthermore, we provide a sufficient condition for an infinite Cayley graph to have a regular 11-factorization. Finally, we construct 1-factorizations that contain a given subfactorization, both having a vertex-regular automorphism group

    A survey on constructive methods for the Oberwolfach problem and its variants

    Full text link
    The generalized Oberwolfach problem asks for a decomposition of a graph GG into specified 2-regular spanning subgraphs F1,…,FkF_1,\ldots, F_k, called factors. The classic Oberwolfach problem corresponds to the case when all of the factors are pairwise isomorphic, and GG is the complete graph of odd order or the complete graph of even order with the edges of a 11-factor removed. When there are two possible factor types, it is called the Hamilton-Waterloo problem. In this paper we present a survey of constructive methods which have allowed recent progress in this area. Specifically, we consider blow-up type constructions, particularly as applied to the case when each factor consists of cycles of the same length. We consider the case when the factors are all bipartite (and hence consist of even cycles) and a method for using circulant graphs to find solutions. We also consider constructions which yield solutions with well-behaved automorphisms.Comment: To be published in the Fields Institute Communications book series. 23 pages, 2 figure

    On the minisymposium problem

    Full text link
    The generalized Oberwolfach problem asks for a factorization of the complete graph KvK_v into prescribed 22-factors and at most a 11-factor. When all 22-factors are pairwise isomorphic and vv is odd, we have the classic Oberwolfach problem, which was originally stated as a seating problem: given vv attendees at a conference with tt circular tables such that the iith table seats aia_i people and ∑i=1tai=v{\sum_{i=1}^t a_i = v}, find a seating arrangement over the v−12\frac{v-1}{2} days of the conference, so that every person sits next to each other person exactly once. In this paper we introduce the related {\em minisymposium problem}, which requires a solution to the generalized Oberwolfach problem on vv vertices that contains a subsystem on mm vertices. That is, the decomposition restricted to the required mm vertices is a solution to the generalized Oberwolfach problem on mm vertices. In the seating context above, the larger conference contains a minisymposium of mm participants, and we also require that pairs of these mm participants be seated next to each other for ⌊m−12⌋\left\lfloor\frac{m-1}{2}\right\rfloor of the days. When the cycles are as long as possible, i.e.\ vv, mm and v−mv-m, a flexible method of Hilton and Johnson provides a solution. We use this result to provide further solutions when v≡m≡2(mod4)v \equiv m \equiv 2 \pmod 4 and all cycle lengths are even. In addition, we provide extensive results in the case where all cycle lengths are equal to kk, solving all cases when m∣vm\mid v, except possibly when kk is odd and vv is even.Comment: 25 page

    Merging Combinatorial Design and Optimization: the Oberwolfach Problem

    Get PDF
    The Oberwolfach Problem OP(F)OP(F), posed by Gerhard Ringel in 1967, is a paradigmatic Combinatorial Design problem asking whether the complete graph KvK_v decomposes into edge-disjoint copies of a 22-regular graph FF of order vv. In Combinatorial Design Theory, so-called difference methods represent a well-known solution technique and construct solutions in infinitely many cases exploiting symmetric and balanced structures. This approach reduces the problem to finding a well-structured 22-factor which allows us to build solutions that we call 11- or 22-rotational according to their symmetries. We tackle OPOP by modeling difference methods with Optimization tools, specifically Constraint Programming (CPCP) and Integer Programming (IPIP), and correspondingly solve instances with up to v=120v=120 within 60s60s. In particular, we model the 22-rotational method by solving in cascade two subproblems, namely the binary and group labeling, respectively. A polynomial-time algorithm solves the binary labeling, while CPCP tackles the group labeling. Furthermore, we prov ide necessary conditions for the existence of some 11-rotational solutions which stem from computational results. This paper shows thereby that both theoretical and empirical results may arise from the interaction between Combinatorial Design Theory and Operation Research
    corecore