Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

Abstract Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries

The effect of laxative use in length of hospital stay and complication rate in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery within an ERAS setting

N.A.</jats:p

Exploring Socioeconomic Inequities in Colorectal Cancer Ostomates: a scoping review

Scoping revie

Evidence Based Surgery Scoping Review

Scoping review investigating the evidence underpinning training and assessment of competence in evidence-based medicine in surgical practic

The independent association of preoperative serum albumin on the functional maturation of radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulae

Purpose: The aim of this study is to test the null hypothesis that preoperative albumin along with other preoperative confounders have no impact on the functional maturation of radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulae (RCAVF). Methods: A retrospective cohort study of n = 195 individuals undergoing RCAVF formation from July 2013 to December 2015 was conducted. The null hypothesis was assessed through chi squared test. Independent association of each variable was evaluated through univariate and multivariate logistic regression model. Pearson's correlation test was also performed between scale variables to establish their causal link. Results: Preoperative hypoalbuminaemic group of individuals demonstrated significant failure of maturation (49.3% vs. 27.2%, p = 0.002). At multivariate analysis, hypoalbuminemia remained an independent marker of fistula failure (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.21-0.76, p = 0.004) and demonstrated a weak but a positive correlation at the endpoint of maturation (R = 0.223, p = 0.002). Conclusions: Preoperative hypoalbuminemia (<35 mg/dL) is independently associated with 40% reduction in the functional maturation of RCAVF. Stratification of this readily available biomarker prior to RCAVF formation may require consideration subjected to further research

Using qualitative methods to evaluate the CRAMsurg learning experience

Using qualitative research methods to evaluate the CRAMsurg learning experience. Specifically the scope of the project is to explore the experience of presenters to the CRAMsurg journal clu

LGBTQ+ Allyship in Post-Graduate Surgical Education: A Scoping Review and Proposal for an Allyship Toolkit

Abstract Background LGBTQ+ allyship in surgical education is critical to supporting the development of inclusive learning and training environments, and equipping trainees with appropriate knowledge and insight to provide competent care to diverse populations. Despite this, significant gaps persist in the integration of LGBTQ+ topics and allyship training within surgical curricula. This scoping review aims to evaluate contemporary educational interventions, identify barriers to their introduction, and proposes early strategies to support LGBTQ+ trainees and their inclusion in postgraduate surgical training and provide insights into the surgical care of this key minority population. Methods Using the Arskey and O’Malley framework and the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a scoping review was conducted of 457 records identified through systematic database searches. Fifteen studies meeting inclusion criteria were reviewed to assess themes related to LGBTQ+ education, allyship, and surgical training. Data were extracted using a standardised proforma and synthesised to highlight strengths, gaps, and potential interventions. Results The review identified key deficits in LGBTQ+ education, including limited exposure to gender-affirming surgery and lack of formal allyship training. Inequities in access to training opportunities, particularly in gender-affirming surgery, were noted across specialties and regions. Mistreatment of LGBTQ+ trainees, including discrimination and harassment, negatively impacted mental health and career satisfaction. Promising interventions, such as structured allyship programmes and multidisciplinary training models, demonstrated improved cultural competence and inclusivity. However, the absence of standardised national guidelines exacerbates disparities in education and training. Conclusions This review highlights a need for strategies to enhance diversity in surgical education. Integration of LGBTQ+ allyship training, development of competency-based guidance, and institutional efforts to promote inclusivity are critical to the success of such strategies. A proposed LGBTQ+ Allyship Toolkit, acronymed SURGEON, suggests a structured approach to address the findings of this review

Using qualitative methods to evaluate the CRAMsurg learning experience

Using qualitative research methods to evaluate the CRAMsurg learning experience. Specifically the scope of the project is to explore the experience of presenters to the CRAMsurg journal clu

Novel Textbook Outcomes following emergency laparotomy: Delphi exercise

Background Textbook outcomes are composite outcome measures that reflect the ideal overall experience for patients. There are many of these in the elective surgery literature but no textbook outcomes have been proposed for patients following emergency laparotomy. The aim was to achieve international consensus amongst experts and patients for the best Textbook Outcomes for non-trauma and trauma emergency laparotomy.Methods A modified Delphi exercise was undertaken with three planned rounds to achieve consensus regarding the best Textbook Outcomes based on the category, number and importance (Likert scale of 1-5) of individual outcome measures. There were separate questions for non-trauma and trauma. A patient engagement exercise was undertaken after round 2 to inform the final round.Results A total of 337 participants from 53 countries participated in all three rounds of the exercise. The final Textbook Outcomes were divided into 'early' and 'longer-term'. For non-trauma patients the proposed early Textbook Outcome was 'Discharged from hospital without serious postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo &gt;= grade III; including intra-abdominal sepsis, organ failure, unplanned re-operation or death). For trauma patients it was 'Discharged from hospital without unexpected transfusion after haemostasis, and no serious postoperative complications (adapted Clavien-Dindo for trauma &gt;= grade III; including intra-abdominal sepsis, organ failure, unplanned re-operation on or death)'. The longer-term Textbook Outcome for both non-trauma and trauma was 'Achieved the early Textbook Outcome, and restoration of baseline quality of life at 1 year'.Conclusion Early and longer-term Textbook Outcomes have been agreed by an international consensus of experts for non-trauma and trauma emergency laparotomy. These now require clinical validation with patient data.We propose novel Textbook Outcomes for emergency laparotomy (for trauma and non-trauma) based on a large international Delphi exercis

A prognostic model for use before elective surgery to estimate the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications (GSU-Pulmonary Score): a development and validation study in three international cohorts

Background: Pulmonary complications are the most common cause of death after surgery. This study aimed to derive and externally validate a novel prognostic model that can be used before elective surgery to estimate the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications and to support resource allocation and prioritisation during pandemic recovery. Methods: Data from an international, prospective cohort study were used to develop a novel prognostic risk model for pulmonary complications after elective surgery in adult patients (aged ≥18 years) across all operation and disease types. The primary outcome measure was postoperative pulmonary complications at 30 days after surgery, which was a composite of pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and unexpected mechanical ventilation. Model development with candidate predictor variables was done in the GlobalSurg-CovidSurg Week dataset (global; October, 2020). Two structured machine learning techniques were explored (XGBoost and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator [LASSO]), and the model with the best performance (GSU-Pulmonary Score) underwent internal validation using bootstrap resampling. The discrimination and calibration of the score were externally validated in two further prospective cohorts: CovidSurg-Cancer (worldwide; February to August, 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic) and RECON (UK and Australasia; January to October, 2019, before the COVID-19 pandemic). The model was deployed as an online web application. The GlobalSurg-CovidSurg Week and CovidSurg-Cancer studies were registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04509986 and NCT04384926. Findings: Prognostic models were developed from 13 candidate predictor variables in data from 86 231 patients (1158 hospitals in 114 countries). External validation included 30 492 patients from CovidSurg-Cancer (726 hospitals in 75 countries) and 6789 from RECON (150 hospitals in three countries). The overall rates of pulmonary complications were 2·0% in derivation data, and 3·9% (CovidSurg-Cancer) and 4·7% (RECON) in the validation datasets. Penalised regression using LASSO had similar discrimination to XGBoost (area under the receiver operating curve [AUROC] 0·786, 95% CI 0·774-0·798 vs 0·785, 0·772-0·797), was more explainable, and required fewer covariables. The final GSU-Pulmonary Score included ten predictor variables and showed good discrimination and calibration upon internal validation (AUROC 0·773, 95% CI 0·751-0·795; Brier score 0·020, calibration in the large [CITL] 0·034, slope 0·954). The model performance was acceptable on external validation in CovidSurg-Cancer (AUROC 0·746, 95% CI 0·733-0·760; Brier score 0·036, CITL 0·109, slope 1·056), but with some miscalibration in RECON data (AUROC 0·716, 95% CI 0·689-0·744; Brier score 0·045, CITL 1·040, slope 1·009). Interpretation: This novel prognostic risk score uses simple predictor variables available at the time of a decision for elective surgery that can accurately stratify patients' risk of postoperative pulmonary complications, including during SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks. It could inform surgical consent, resource allocation, and hospital-level prioritisation as elective surgery is upscaled to address global backlogs. Funding: National Institute for Health Research