In Search of a New Model: Library Resource Sharing in China - A Comparative Study

This paper reviews the framework of library resource sharing (LRS) in China and examines, from a comparative perspective, cases of recent development, particularly in the 1990s and early 2000s. Highlights include: (1) historical review of LRS in the U.S. and China, particularly in the areas of print union catalogs and union lists, online bibliographic utilities, and interlibrary loan; (2) literature review of Chinese publications, and LRS issues and challenges in China; (3) Analysis of three LRS models to provide a contextual grasp of a paradigm shift taking place in China; and (4) comparative analysis of LRS objectives, structure, and governance, etc., in the U.S. and China. The study also underscores the imperative for building a national digital library system in China to gain a competitive edge in resource sharing and to support the country’s rapid social and economic growth. At this stage of development, the success of China Academic Library & Information System provides a convincing argument for a national digital library system with its methods of governing, financing, and development

Library Consortia in China

This paper traces the history and development of library consortia in China from 1980 to the present. It also gives examples and descriptions of various types of library consortia in China, including academic, public, special, multi-type library consortia at the regional and national level

Lending and Borrowing across Borders: Issues and Challenges with International Resource Sharing

This article reports on a survey of U.S. libraries regarding international interlibrary loan. The survey was conducted by the ALA RUSA STARS International Interlibrary Loan Committee

In Search of a New Model: Library Resource Sharing in China - A Comparative Study

This paper reviews the framework of library resource sharing (LRS) in China and examines, from a comparative perspective, cases of recent development, particularly in the 1990s and early 2000s. Highlights include: (1) historical review of LRS in the U.S. and China, particularly in the areas of print union catalogs and union lists, online bibliographic utilities, and interlibrary loan; (2) literature review of Chinese publications, and LRS issues and challenges in China; (3) Analysis of three LRS models to provide a contextual grasp of a paradigm shift taking place in China; and (4) comparative analysis of LRS objectives, structure, and governance, etc., in the U.S. and China. The study also underscores the imperative for building a national digital library system in China to gain a competitive edge in resource sharing and to support the country’s rapid social and economic growth. At this stage of development, the success of China Academic Library & Information System provides a convincing argument for a national digital library system with its methods of governing, financing, and development

Lending and Borrowing Across Borders: Issues and Challenges with International Resource Sharing

The charge of the RUSA Sharing and Transforming Access to Resources Section (STARS) International Interlibrary Loan Committee is to evaluate trends in international interlibrary loan (ILL) and resource sharing, to develop materials and resources for international ILL practitioners, and to promote international ILL resource sharing efforts. In 2006, the committee decided to survey U.S. libraries regarding their international ILL activities as a way to gather information on the current environment and identify strategies for improving international ILL. The survey was deployed in the spring of 2007. In the fall of 2008, the committee members drafted an executive summary, which was approved by the RUSA STARS Executive Committee and posted to the STARS website (www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/ divs/rusa/sections/stars/section/internationill/ILLReport ExecSummary.pdf). Specifically, the survey sought to determine what types of U.S. libraries participate in international ILL services as borrowers and lenders, to what extent libraries work internationally, and what tools and services survey participants use to go global. The results of the survey will help guide the committee in developing tools to resolve issues that may hinder international resource sharing and uncover opportunities to promote and expand both the use of and the participation in global ILL services. This article intends to reflect on changes in the resource-sharing environment since 1998, provide an overview of current practice, and lay the foundation for future International Interlibrary Loan Committee efforts

Impact of Evidence‐Based Stroke Care on Patient Outcomes: A Multilevel Analysis of an International Study

Background The uptake of proven stroke treatments varies widely. We aimed to determine the association of evidence‐based processes of care for acute ischemic stroke ( AIS ) and clinical outcome of patients who participated in the HEADPOST (Head Positioning in Acute Stroke Trial), a multicenter cluster crossover trial of lying flat versus sitting up, head positioning in acute stroke. Methods and Results Use of 8 AIS processes of care were considered: reperfusion therapy in eligible patients; acute stroke unit care; antihypertensive, antiplatelet, statin, and anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation; dysphagia assessment; and physiotherapist review. Hierarchical, mixed, logistic regression models were performed to determine associations with good outcome (modified Rankin Scale scores 0–2) at 90 days, adjusted for patient and hospital variables. Among 9485 patients with AIS, implementation of all processes of care in eligible patients, or “defect‐free” care, was associated with improved outcome (odds ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.18–1.65) and better survival (odds ratio, 2.23; 95% CI , 1.62–3.09). Defect‐free stroke care was also significantly associated with excellent outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0–1) (odds ratio, 1.22; 95% CI , 1.04–1.43). No hospital characteristic was independently predictive of outcome. Only 1445 (15%) of eligible patients with AIS received all processes of care, with significant regional variations in overall and individual rates. Conclusions Use of evidence‐based care is associated with improved clinical outcome in AIS . Strategies are required to address regional variation in the use of proven AIS treatments. Clinical Trial Registration URL : https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique Identifier: NCT 02162017. </jats:sec

Impact of Evidence-Based Stroke Care on Patient Outcomes: A Multilevel Analysis of an International Study

Background-The uptake of proven stroke treatments varies widely. We aimed to determine the association of evidence-based processes of care for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and clinical outcome of patients who participated in the HEADPOST (Head Positioning in Acute Stroke Trial), a multicenter cluster crossover trial of lying flat versus sitting up, head positioning in acute stroke. Methods and Results-Use of 8 AIS processes of care were considered: reperfusion therapy in eligible patients; acute stroke unit care; antihypertensive, antiplatelet, statin, and anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation; dysphagia assessment; and physiotherapist review. Hierarchical, mixed, logistic regression models were performed to determine associations with good outcome (modified Rankin Scale scores 0-2) at 90 days, adjusted for patient and hospital variables. Among 9485 patients with AIS, implementation of all processes of care in eligible patients, or defect-free care, was associated with improved outcome (odds ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.18-1.65) and better survival (odds ratio, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.62-3.09). Defect-free stroke care was also significantly associated with excellent outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-1) (odds ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.04-1.43). No hospital characteristic was independently predictive of outcome. Only 1445 (15%) of eligible patients with AIS received all processes of care, with significant regional variations in overall and individual rates. Conclusions-Use of evidence-based care is associated with improved clinical outcome in AIS. Strategies are required to address regional variation in the use of proven AIS treatments.National Health and Medical Research Council of AustraliaUniv New South Wales, Fac Med, George Inst Global Hlth, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaCtr Estudios Clin, Inst Ciencias & Innovac Med, Santiago, ChileClin Alemana Univ Desarrollo, Fac Med, Serv Neurol, Dept Neurol & Psiquiatria, Santiago, ChilePeking Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, George Inst Global Hlth, Beijing, Peoples R ChinaAustralian Catholic Univ, Nursing Res Inst, St Vincents Hlth Australia Sydney, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaUniv Cent Lancashire, Fac Hlth & Wellbeing, Preston, Lancs, EnglandUniv Chile, Fac Med, Dept Ciencias Neurol, Santiago, ChileUniv Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto Med Sch, Stroke Serv Neurol Div, Ribeirao Preto, BrazilFukuoka Univ, Fac Med, Dept Prevent Med & Publ Hlth, Fukuoka, Fukuoka, JapanUniv Leicester, Dept Cardiovasc Sci, Leicester Biomed Res Ctr, Leicester, Leics, EnglandUniv Leicester, Natl Inst Hlth Res, Leicester Biomed Res Ctr, Leicester, Leics, EnglandUniv Edinburgh, Ctr Clin Brain Sci, Edinburgh, Midlothian, ScotlandGeorge Inst Global Hlth, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaUniv Desarrollo, Serv Neurol, Dept Neurol & Psiquiatria Clin Alemana Santiago, Santiago, ChileSt Vincents Hlth Australia Sydney, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaAustralian Catholic Univ, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaUniv Cent Lancashire, Stroke Practice Res Unit, Sch Hlth, Lancashire Clin Trials Unit, Preston, Lancs, EnglandUniv Leicester, Dept Cardiovasc Sci, Cardiovasc Res Ctr, British Heart Fdn, Leicester, Leics, EnglandUniv Kelaniya, Dept Pharmacol, Fac Med, Colombo, Sri LankaChristian Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Neurol, Ludhiana, IndiaKaohsiung Med Univ & Hosp, Dept Neurol, Kaohsiung, TaiwanLinkou Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Neurol, Taipei, TaiwanPeking Union Med Coll Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R ChinaUniv Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto Sch Med, Ribeirao Preto, BrazilMonash Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic, AustraliaUniv Cent Lancashire, Sch Hlth Sci, Coll Hlth & Wellbeing, Preston, Lancs, EnglandUniv Desarrollo, Santiago, ChileUniv New South Wales, Neurosci Res Australia, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaNatl Univ Singapore, Dept Pharmacol, Singapore, SingaporeBradford Royal Infirm, Bradford Inst Hlth Res, Leeds, W Yorkshire, EnglandChristian Med College, Ludhiana, Punjab, IndiaRemediumOne Pvt Ltd, Kandy, Sri LankaKaohsiung Med Univ, Chung Ho Mem Hosp, Kaohsiung, TaiwanCalvary Publ Hosp Bruce, Bruce, AustraliaRoyal North Shore Hosp, St Leonards, NSW, AustraliaRoyal Prince Alfred Hosp, Camperdown, NSW, AustraliaConcord Repatriat Gen Hosp, Camperdown, NSW, AustraliaFiona Stanley Hosp, Camperdown, NSW, AustraliaMacquarie Base Hosp, Melbourne, Vic, AustraliaUniv Sao Paulo, Fac Med Ribeirao Preto, Hosp Clin, Sao Paulo, BrazilHosp Governador Celso Ramos, Florianopolis, SC, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Hosp Fac Med Botucatu, UNESP, Sao Paulo, BrazilYangquan Coalmine Grp Gen Hosp, Yangquan, Peoples R ChinaNanjing Med Univ, Nanjing Hosp 1, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China85 Hosp Peoples Liberat Army, Beijing, Peoples R ChinaChifeng Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Chifeng, Peoples R ChinaBeijing Pinggu Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R ChinaWenzhou Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Wenzhou, Peoples R ChinaSoochow Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Suzhou, Peoples R ChinaHebei Med Univ, Hosp 3, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, Peoples R ChinaCapital Med Univ, Xuanwu Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R ChinaJining Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Jining, Peoples R ChinaThird Peoples Hosp Huizhou, Huizhou, Peoples R ChinaSecond Cangzhou Cent Hosp, Cangzhou, Peoples R ChinaShanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Hosp Affiliated, Sch Med, Shanghai, Peoples R ChinaBaogang Hosp, Baotou, Peoples R ChinaHarbin Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Harbin, Heilongjiang, Peoples R ChinaShanghai Jiao Tong Univ Sch, Tong Ren Hosp, Peoples Hosp Hejian City, Shanghai, Peoples R ChinaPeking Univ, Shougang Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R ChinaGuangzhou Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R ChinaSecond Hosp Nanchang, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R ChinaBethune Int Peace Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R ChinaHua Henan Prov Peoples Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R ChinaHua Henan Prov Peoples Hosp, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R ChinaShanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Shanghai Ninth Peoples Hosp, Shanghai, Peoples R ChinaShijiazhuang Cent Hosp, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, Peoples R ChinaHosp Base San Jos de Osorno, Osorno, ChileChristian Med Coll & Hosp, Ludhiana, Punjab, IndiaUnit Narayana Hrudayalaya Ltd, Mazumdar Shaw Med Ctr, Bangalore, Karnataka, IndiaDr Ramesh Cardiac & Multispecial Hosp Pvt Ltd, Guntur, IndiaPost Grad Inst Med Educ & Res, Chandigarh, IndiaBaby Mem Hosp Ltd, Calicut, Kerala, IndiaSree Chitra Tirunal Inst Med Sci & Technol, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, IndiaSri Jayawardenepura Gen Hosp, Sri Jayawardenepura Kott, Sri LankaColombo North Teaching Hosp, Colombo, Sri LankaColombo South Coching Hosp, Colombo, Sri LankaLinkou Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Taoyuan, TaiwanTaipei Med Univ, Shuang Ho Hosp, Taipei, TaiwanEn Chu Kong Hosp, New Taipei, TaiwanNatl Cheng Kung Univ Hosp, Tainan, TaiwanQueen Alexandra Hosp, Portsmouth, Hants, EnglandPortsmouth Hosp NHS Natl Hlth Serv iTrust, Portsmouth, Hants, EnglandUniv Coll London Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, London, EnglandUniv Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hosp Birmingham, Birmingham, W Midlands, EnglandSouthend Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Southend On Sea, EnglandKings Coll Hosp London, London, EnglandYork Teaching Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, York, N Yorkshire, EnglandNottingham Univ Hosp NHS Trust, Nottingham, EnglandBlackpool Teaching Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Blackpool, EnglandGloucestershire Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Gloucestershire Royal Hosp, Gloucester, EnglandTeaching Hospi NHS Fdn Trust, London, EnglandRoyal Cornwall Hosp NHS Trust, Truro, EnglandRoyal London Hosp, Barts Hlth NHS Trust, London, EnglandSheffield Teaching Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, EnglandCambridge Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Addenbrookes Hosp, Cambridge, EnglandRoyal Victoria Hosp, Belfast Hlth & Social Care Trust, London, EnglandPinderfields Gen Hosp, Mid Yorkshire Hosp NHS Trust, Wakefield, EnglandRoyal Devon & Exeter NHS Fdn Trust, London, EnglandBradford Teaching Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Bradford, W Yorkshire, EnglandGreat Western Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Swindon, Wilts, EnglandWatford Dist Gen Hosp, Watford, EnglandImperial Coll Healthcare NHS Trust, London, EnglandMedway NHS Fdn Trust, Gillingham, EnglandRoyal Liverpool & Broadgreen Univ NHS Trust, Liverpool, Merseyside, EnglandCalderdale & Huddersfield NHS Fdn Trust, Huddersfield, W Yorkshire, EnglandHywel Dda Univ Hlth Board, Haverfordwest, WalesChesterfield Royal Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Calow, EnglandLuton & Dunstable Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Luton, Beds, EnglandCountess Chester Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Chester, Cheshire, EnglandPeterborough City Hosp, Peterborough, Cambs, EnglandUniv Hosp Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester Royal Infirm, Leicester, Leics, EnglandDist Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, London, EnglandBarnsley Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Barnsley, EnglandDorset Cty Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dorchester, EnglandRoyal Bournemouth & Christchurch Hosp NHS Fdn Tru, Royal Bournemouth Hosp, Bournemouth, Dorset, EnglandSouthern Hlth & Social Care Trust, Craigavon Area Hosp, Portadown, EnglandUnited Lincolnshire Hosp NHS Trust, Pilgrim Hosp, Lincoln, EnglandBedford Hosp NHS Trust, Bedford, EnglandSao Paulo State Univ, Hosp Fac Med Botucatu, UNESP, Sao Paulo, BrazilNational Health and Medical Research Council of Australia: 106696