44 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Bacterial chemoreceptor signaling complexes control kinase activity by stabilizing the catalytic domain of CheA
Motile bacteria have a chemotaxis system that enables them to sense their environment and direct their swimming toward favorable conditions. Chemotaxis involves a signaling process in which ligand binding to the extracellular domain of the chemoreceptor alters the activity of the histidine kinase, CheA, bound ~300 Å away to the distal cytoplasmic tip of the receptor, to initiate a phosphorylation cascade that controls flagellar rotation. The cytoplasmic domain of the receptor is thought to propagate this signal via changes in dynamics and/or stability, but it is unclear how these changes modulate the kinase activity of CheA. To address this question, we have used hydrogen deuterium exchange mass spectrometry to probe the structure and dynamics of CheA within functional signaling complexes of the Escherichia coli aspartate receptor cytoplasmic fragment, CheA, and CheW. Our results reveal that stabilization of the P4 catalytic domain of CheA correlates with kinase activation. Furthermore, differences in activation of the kinase that occur during sensory adaptation depend on receptor destabilization of the P3 dimerization domain of CheA. Finally, hydrogen exchange properties of the P1 domain that bears the phosphorylated histidine identify the dimer interface of P1/P1’ in the CheA dimer and support an ordered sequential binding mechanism of catalysis, in which dimeric P1/P1’ has productive interactions with P4 only upon nucleotide binding. Thus stabilization/destabilization of domains is a key element of the mechanism of modulating CheA kinase activity in chemotaxis, and may play a role in the control of other kinases
Structure of bacterial cytoplasmic chemoreceptor arrays and implications for chemotactic signaling
Most motile bacteria sense and respond to their environment through a transmembrane chemoreceptor array whose structure and function have been well-studied, but many species also contain an additional cluster of chemoreceptors in their cytoplasm. Although the cytoplasmic cluster is essential for normal chemotaxis in some organisms, its structure and function remain unknown. Here we use electron cryotomography to image the cytoplasmic chemoreceptor
cluster in Rhodobacter sphaeroides and Vibrio cholerae. We show that just like transmembrane arrays, cytoplasmic clusters contain trimers-of-receptor-dimers organized in 12-nm hexagonal arrays. In contrast to transmembrane arrays, however, cytoplasmic clusters comprise two CheA/
CheW baseplates sandwiching two opposed receptor arrays. We further show that cytoplasmic fragments of normally transmembrane E. coli chemoreceptors form similar sandwiched structures in the presence of molecular crowding agents. Together these results suggest that the 12-nm
hexagonal architecture is fundamentally important and that sandwiching and crowding can replace the stabilizing effect of the membrane
New Insights into Bacterial Chemoreceptor Array Structure and Assembly from Electron Cryotomography
Bacterial chemoreceptors cluster in highly ordered, cooperative, extended arrays with a conserved architecture, but the principles that govern array assembly remain unclear. Here we show images of cellular arrays as well as selected chemoreceptor complexes reconstituted in vitro that reveal new principles of array structure and assembly. First, in every case, receptors clustered in a trimers-of-dimers configuration, suggesting this is a highly favored fundamental building block. Second, these trimers-of-receptor dimers exhibited great versatility in the kinds of contacts they formed with each other and with other components of the signaling pathway, although only one architectural type occurred in native arrays. Third, the membrane, while it likely accelerates the formation of arrays, was neither necessary nor sufficient for lattice formation. Molecular crowding substituted for the stabilizing effect of the membrane and allowed cytoplasmic receptor fragments to form sandwiched lattices that strongly resemble the cytoplasmic chemoreceptor arrays found in some bacterial species. Finally, the effective determinant of array structure seemed to be CheA and CheW, which formed a “superlattice” of alternating CheA-filled and CheA-empty rings that linked receptor trimers-of-dimer units into their native hexagonal lattice. While concomitant overexpression of receptors, CheA, and CheW yielded arrays with native spacing, the CheA occupancy was lower and less ordered, suggesting that temporal and spatial coordination of gene expression driven by a single transcription factor may be vital for full order, or that array overgrowth may trigger a disassembly process. The results described here provide new insights into the assembly intermediates and assembly mechanism of this massive macromolecular complex
Signaling-Related Mobility Changes in Bacterial Chemotaxis Receptors Revealed by Solid-State NMR
Bacteria employ remarkable
membrane-bound nanoarrays to sense their
environment and direct their swimming. Arrays consist of chemotaxis
receptor trimers of dimers that are bridged at their membrane-distal
tips by rings of two cytoplasmic proteins, a kinase CheA and a coupling
protein CheW. It is not clear how ligand binding to the periplasmic
domain of the receptor deactivates the CheA kinase bound to the cytoplasmic
tip ∼300 Å away, but the mechanism is thought to involve
changes in dynamics within the cytoplasmic domain. To test these proposals,
we applied solid-state NMR mobility-filtered experiments to functional
complexes of the receptor cytoplasmic fragment (U–<sup>13</sup>C,<sup>15</sup>N-CF), CheA, and CheW. Assembly of these proteins
into native-like, homogeneous arrays is mediated by either vesicle
binding or molecular crowding agents, and paramagnetic relaxation
enhancement is used to overcome sensitivity challenges in these large
complexes. INEPT spectra reveal that a significant fraction of the
receptor is dynamic on the nanosecond or shorter time scale, and these
dynamics change with signaling state. The mobile regions are identified
through a combination of biochemical and NMR approaches (protein truncations
and unique chemical shifts). The INEPT spectra are consistent with
an asymmetric mobility in the methylation region (N-helix mobility
≫ C-helix mobility) and reveal an increase in the mobility
of the N-helix in the kinase-off state. This finding identifies functionally
relevant dynamics in the receptor, and suggests that this N-helix
segment plays a key role in propagating the signal