Initial surgical management of injuries to the lower extremities in patients with multiple and/or severe injuries - A systematic review and clinical practice guideline update

PURPOSE Our aim was to develop new evidence-based and consensus-based recommendations for the initial inhospital management of lower-extremity injuries in patients with multiple and/or severe trauma. This guideline topic is part of the 2022 update of the German Guideline on the Treatment of Patients with multiple and/or severe Injuries. METHODS MEDLINE and Embase were systematically searched to May 2021. Randomised controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, and comparative registry studies were included if they compared interventions for the initial surgical and non-surgical management of fractures, dislocations or vascular injuries of the lower extremities in patients with multiple and/or severe trauma. We considered patient-relevant clinical outcomes such as mortality, complication rates, length of stay, and function. Risk of bias was assessed using NICE 2012 checklists. The evidence was synthesised narratively, and expert consensus was used to develop recommendations and determine their strength. RESULTS Eleven studies were identified. They addressed time to definitive fixation (n = 10 studies) and amputation (n = 1). Two new recommendations were developed, one was modified. All recommendations achieved strong consensus. CONCLUSION This systematic literature review and subsequent expert consensus process resulted in the following new key recommendations. It is recommended that isolated and multiple lower-extremity fractures are managed with primary definitive fixation in patients whose condition is stable. Patients condition is not considered stable should be managed with primary temporary fixation. In addition, it is recommended that dislocations of the lower extremities are reduced and immobilised as early as possible

Lumbar Facet Joint Radiofrequency Denervation Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain: Enhanced Outcome Compared With Chemical Neurolysis (Ethyl Alcohol 95% or Glycerol 20%)

BACKGROUND It was hypothesized that radiofrequency denervation (RFD) of lumbar facet joints is associated with superior pain abolishment and less complications than chemical neurolysis (with ethyl alcohol or glycerol) in patients with chronic facet joint arthropathy. METHODS For this prospective cohort study, adult patients with chronic lumbar facet joint arthropathy were prospectively enrolled between 2017 and 2019. The following groups were compared before the intervention and 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after the intervention: RFD, chemical neurolysis with ethyl alcohol 95% (EA-95), or glycerol 20% (Gly-20). Outcome parameters included the Core Outcome Measures Index for the back (COMI-back), World Health Organization (WHO) pain ladder level, and visual analog scale (VAS). P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS A total of 95 patients with a mean age of 63.7 years were included. Among them, 30 patients underwent RFD, 30 patients were treated with EA-95, and 35 individuals were treated with Gly-20. After 6 weeks, RFD patients had significantly lower VAS scores compared with the EA-95 group. After 6 months, both VAS and COMI were significantly lower in RFD patients than in the Gly-20 group. Twelve months after intervention, VAS scores were significantly lower in the RFD group compared with the Gly-20 group. CONCLUSIONS This study reveals that RFD is associated with improved pain relief and quality of life compared with chemical neurolysis for facet joint-related chronic lower back pain and should be considered as the treatment of choice in patients with chronic low back pain due to facet joint arthropathy. CLINICAL RELEVANCE The current study provides information that may improve clinical decision making in the treatment of chronic lumbar facet joint arthropathy and to appropriately counsel such patients about expected outcomes

Epidemiology and Mortality of Surgical Amputations in Severely Injured Patients with Extremity Injuries-A Retrospective Analysis of 32,572 Patients from the TraumaRegister DGU®^{®}

Background: Extremity fractures are common injuries in polytraumatized patients. Concomitant injuries to the soft tissue, vessels and nerves in these fractures are defined as mangled extremities. The decision for or against limb salvage is dependent on the patient's physiology and the limb status. In severely injured patients with critical physiological status, limb salvage may be contraindicated. International data on the epidemiology and management of mangled limbs in severely injured patients are lacking. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the incidence of polytraumatized patients with severe injuries to either upper (UL) or lower limb (LL) as well as their management. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted of patients aged 16 years and above with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥ 16 who sustained fractures to the limbs and were admitted to a certified trauma center of the TraumaRegister DGU$^{®}$ (TR-DGU) between 2009 and 2019. Results: In total, we assessed 32,572 patients (UL: 14,567, mean age 48.3 years, 70% male and LL: 18,005, mean age 47.0 years, 70.5% male) The mean ISS in UL was 28.8 (LL 29.3). Fractures to the humerus (n = 4969) and radius (n = 7008) were predominantly assessed in UL, and fractures to the femur (n = 9502) and tibia (n = 8076) were most common in LL. In both groups, the most frequent injury mechanism was motor vehicle accidents, and more than half (UL: 9416 and LL: 11,689) of the patients had additional severe Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) ≥ 3 chest trauma. 915 patients in UL and 1481 in LL died within 24 h of the index admission. Surgical amputation occurred in 242 (UL) and 422 (LL) cases with a peak ratio in patients with an ISS above 50 in both groups. In both groups, patients with severe concomitant chest trauma were more often surgically amputated. In both groups, fewer patients with surgical amputations died within 24 h of admission (3.3% vs. 6.3% UL; 6.4% vs. 8.3% LL) compared to patients without amputation, but more patients with surgical amputations died within the overall hospital admissions (15.7% vs. 11.9% UL; 19.2% vs. 14.2%). In both groups, hemodynamical shock as well as the administration of Packed Red Blood Cells (PRBCs) were associated with a higher amputation rate. Conclusions: Surgical amputations after major trauma seem to be rare. Hemodynamical instability seems to play a key role in the management of mangled limbs. Patients with life-saving surgical amputation still have an increased overall in-hospital mortality

The implementation of physicians assistant in a surgical ward improves continuity in daily clinical work and increases comprehensibility of nurses and physicians

INTRODUCTION Physician Assistant (PA) have been deployed to increase the capacity of a team, supporting continuity and medical cover. The goal of this study was to assess the implementation of PAs on continuity of surgical rounds, on the collaboration of nurses and physicians and on support of administrative work. METHODS This cross-sectional survey was performed on nurses and physicians who work full-time at a surgical ward in a Swiss reference center. PAs were introduced in our institution in 2019. Participants answered a self-developed questionnaire 6 and 12 months after the implementation of PAs. Administrative work, teamwork, improvement of workflow, and training of physicians has been assessed. Participants answered questions on a 5-point Likert scale and were stratified according to profession (nurse, physician). RESULTS Participants (n = 53) reported a positive effect on the regular conduct of rounds (2.9, SD 1.1 points after 6 weeks and 3.5, SD 1.1 points after 12 weeks, p = 0.05). A significant improvement of nurse-doctor collaboration has been reported (3.6, SD 1.0 and 4.2, SD 0.8, p = 0.05). Nurses (n = 28, 52.8%) reported the that PAs are integrated in the physicians team rather than the nurses team (4.0, SD 0.0 points and 4.4, SD 0.7 points, p = 0.266) and a significant beneficial effect on the surgical clinic (3.7, SD 1.0 points and 4.4, SD 0.8 points, p = 0.043). Improved overall management of surgical cases was reported by the physicians (n = 25, 47.2%) (4.8, SD 0.4 and 4.3, SD 0.6, p = 0.046). CONCLUSION The implementation of PA has improved the collaboration of physicians and nurses substantially. Continuity of rounds has improved and the administrative workload for residents decreased substantially. Overall, the implementation of PA was reported to be beneficial for the surgical clinic

Elective implant removal in the upper extremity: only symptomatic patients benefit

Purpose: Elective implant removal (IR) in the upper extremity remains controversial. Implants in the olecranon and clavicle are commonly removed for prominence, unlike in the distal radius. Patient-reported symptomatic cannot be verified, and nonspecific discomfort remains unquantified. In this study, indications and outcomes of IR at the clavicle, olecranon and distal radius were evaluated, with a focus on postoperative patient satisfaction. Materials and methods: In this retrospective, single-center cohort study, patients, who received elective IR of the clavicle, olecranon and distal radius were included. Patients were followed up at least six weeks after IR. Outcomes included patient satisfaction, symptom resolution, and complications. Results: One hundred and eighty-nine patients were included. Unspecific symptoms of discomfort were the most prevalent indication for IR (48.7%), followed by pain (29.6%) and objective limited range of motion (ROM) (7%). Pain and limited ROM combined was observed in 13.8%. Subjective benefit following IR was described in 54%. Patients with limited ROM (OR 4.7, p < 0.001) or pain (OR 4.1, p < 0.001) were more likely to experience alleviation of complaints. Patients with unspecific symptoms of discomfort, often did not report improvement. Major complications occurred in 2%. Refractures were detected at the clavicle (3.7%) and at the olecranon (2.5%). Minor complication rate was 5%. Conclusion: IR is a safe procedure in the upper extremity. Indications based on unspecific symptoms of discomfort have a significant lower rate of patient satisfaction postoperatively. Elective IR should be considered cautiously, if it is driven primarily by unspecific symptoms of discomfort. Patient education is relevant to prevent dissatisfying outcome

Lessons learned from the mechanisms of posttraumatic inflammation extrapolated to the inflammatory response in COVID-19: a review

Up to 20% of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) patients develop severe inflammatory complications with diffuse pulmonary inflammation, reflecting acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). A similar clinical profile occurs in severe trauma cases. This review compares pathophysiological and therapeutic principles of severely injured trauma patients and severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The development of sequential organ failure in trauma parallels deterioration seen in severe COVID-19. Based on established pathophysiological models in the field of trauma, two complementary pathways of disease progression into severe COVID-19 have been identified. Furthermore, the transition from local contained disease into systemic and remote inflammation has been addressed. More specifically, the traumatology concept of sequential insults ('hits') resulting in immune dysregulation, is applied to COVID-19 disease progression modelling. Finally, similarities in post-insult humoral and cellular immune responses to severe trauma and severe COVID-19 are described. To minimize additional 'hits' to COVID-19 patients, we suggest postponing all elective surgery in endemic areas. Based on traumatology experience, we propose that immunoprotective protocols including lung protective ventilation, optimal thrombosis prophylaxis, secondary infection prevention and calculated antibiotic therapy are likely also beneficial in the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infections. Finally, rising SARS-CoV-2 infection and mortality rates mandate exploration of out-of-the box treatment concepts, including experimental therapies designed for trauma care

Timing of Spinal Surgery in Polytrauma: The Relevance of Injury Severity, Injury Level and Associated Injuries

STUDY DESIGN Retrospective database analysis. OBJECTIVE Polytraumatized patients with spinal injuries require tailor-made treatment plans. Severity of both spinal and concomitant injuries determine timing of spinal surgery. Aim of this study was to evaluate the role of spinal injury localization, severity and concurrent injury patterns on timing of surgery and subsequent outcome. METHODS The TraumaRegister DGU$^{®}$ was utilized and patients, aged ≥16 years, with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥16 and diagnosed with relevant spinal injuries (abbreviated injury scale, AIS ≥ 3) were selected. Concurrent spinal and non-spinal injuries were analysed and the relation between injury severity, concurrent injury patterns and timing of spinal surgery was determined. RESULTS 12.596 patients with a mean age of 50.8 years were included. 7.2% of patients had relevant multisegmental spinal injuries. Furthermore, 50% of patients with spine injuries AIS ≥3 had a more severe non-spinal injury to another body part. ICU and hospital stay were superior in patients treated within 48 hrs for lumbar and thoracic spinal injuries. In cervical injuries early intervention (<48 hrs) was associated with increased mortality rates (9.7 vs 6.3%). CONCLUSIONS The current multicentre study demonstrates that polytrauma patients frequently sustain multiple spinal injuries, and those with an index spine injury may therefore benefit from standardized whole-spine imaging. Moreover, timing of surgical spinal surgery and outcome appear to depend on the severity of concomitant injuries and spinal injury localization. Future prospective studies are needed to identify trauma characteristics that are associated with improved outcome upon early or late spinal surgery

Clinical and functional outcomes of locked plating vs. cerclage compression wiring for AO type C patellar fractures- a retrospective single-center cohort study

PURPOSE: Although "tension-band wiring" is still commonly used to stabilize patellar fractures, the technique has recently been scrutinized due to biomechanical insufficiency. Consequently, the AO Foundation renamed the principle to compression cerclage wiring (CCW). Several studies propose favorable outcomes when utilizing locked plating (LP). This study aims to compare outcome of CCW and LP for complex patellar fractures. METHODS: A retrospective, single-center cohort study was performed on patients who underwent operative treatment for (AO 34 C-Type) patellar fractures between April 2013 and March 2023. Patients with a 12 month follow up were included. We grouped and compared patients based on the applied treatment strategy: group LP vs. group CCW. Primary outcome parameters included implant-related complications and revision surgeries. Secondary outcomes were length of stay, return to work and 12 months functional outcome (Lysholm score). Odd ratios for complications and revisions were calculated using the conditional Maximum Likelihood Estimate. The threshold for statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Of 145 patients, 63 could be included (group LP: n = 23 and group CCW: n = 40). Fractures in group LP were significantly more complex in regard to AO Classification (p < 0.001), number of fragments (p < 0.001) and degree of comminution (p < 0.001), yet odds of complications were significantly lower in group LP (OR: 0.147; 95%CI: 0.015-0.742; p = 0.009). K-wire migration was the most common complication in group CCW (20%). Odds of revision surgery were significantly lower in group LP (OR: 0.000; 95%CI: 0.000-1.120; p = 0.041). The average Lysholm score at one year was favorable in both groups (89.8; SD: 11.9 in group LP and 90.6; SD: 9.3 in group CCW; n.s.). CONCLUSION: In our study cohort, LP was routinely chosen for more complex fracture morphologies; nevertheless the data implies that LP may be considered as the superior fixation technique in regard to complications and revision operations. Especially, K-wire migration occurs frequently after CCW. The one year functional outcome was comparable between the groups, with both demonstrating good results. Prospective randomized studies are indicated to validate our findings

Satisfactory 2-year outcome of minimal invasive hybrid stabilization with double treated screws for unstable osteoporotic spinal fractures

PURPOSE: This study evaluates whether the fracture level alters the outcomes of minimally invasive hybrid stabilization (MIHS) with double-threaded, uncemented polyaxial screws for unstable osteoporotic vertebral fractures. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included 73 patients (71.23% females, mean age: 79.9 ± 8.8 years) with unstable OF 3-4 fractures treated by MIHS between Nov 2015-Jan 2018. Patient characteristics, operative data, clinical outcomes, complications, radiological outcomes, and midterm (24-month) follow-up regarding functionality, pain, and quality of life were analyzed. RESULTS: Patients had thoracolumbar (71.23%), thoracic (10.97%), and lumbar (17.8%) fractures. Operative time was < 120 min in 73.97% of patients, with blood loss < 500 ml in 97.25% of cases. No in-hospital mortality was recorded. Spine-associated complications occurred in 15.07% of patients, while 36.98% of patients had urinary tract infections (n = 12), pneumonia (n = 5), and electrolyte disturbances (n = 9). The mean length of hospital stay was 13.38 ± 7.20 days. Clinically-relevant screw loosening occurred in 1.7% of screws, and secondary adjacent fractures were diagnosed in 5.48% of patients. The alpha-angle improved significantly postoperatively (mean change: 5.4°) and remained stable for 24 months. The beta-angle improved significantly from 16.3° ± 7.5 to 10.8° ± 5.6 postoperatively but increased slightly to 14.1° ± 6.2 at midterm follow-up. Although no differences were seen regarding baseline data, clinical outcomes, and complications, fracture level significantly altered the COMI score at 24 months with no effect on pain score or quality-of-life. CONCLUSION: MIHS using polyaxial screws is a safe treatment for single-level osteoporotic spinal fractures. Fracture level did not alter radiological reduction loss; however, it significantly altered patients' function at 24 months

Discrimination and calibration of a prediction model for mortality is decreased in secondary transferred patients: a validation in the TraumaRegister DGU

INTRODUCTION The Revised Injury Severity Classification II (RISC II) score represents a data-derived score that aims to predict mortality in severely injured patients. The aim of this study was to assess the discrimination and calibration of RISC II in secondary transferred polytrauma patients. METHODS This study was performed on the multicentre database of the TraumaRegister DGU. Inclusion criteria included Injury Severity Score (ISS)≥9 points and complete demographic data. Exclusion criteria included patients with 'do not resuscitate' orders or late transfers (>24 hours after initial trauma). Patients were stratified based on way of admission into patients transferred to a European trauma centre after initial treatment in another hospital (group Tr) and primary admitted patients who were not transferred out (group P). The RISC II score was calculated within each group at admission after secondary transfer (group Tr) and at primary admission (group P) and compared with the observed mortality rate. The calibration and discrimination of prediction were analysed. RESULTS Group P included 116 112 (91%) patients and group Tr included 11 604 (9%) patients. The study population was predominantly male (n=86 280, 70.1%), had a mean age of 53.2 years and a mean ISS of 20.7 points. Patients in group Tr were marginally older (54 years vs 52 years) and a had slightly higher ISS (21.5 points vs 20.1 points). Median time from accident site to hospital admission was 60 min in group P and 241 min (4 hours) in group Tr. Observed and predicted mortality based on RISC II were nearly identical in group P (10.9% and 11.0%, respectively) but predicted mortality was worse (13.4%) than observed mortality (11.1%) in group Tr. CONCLUSION The way of admission alters the calibration of prediction models for mortality in polytrauma patients. Mortality prediction in secondary transferred polytrauma patients should be calculated separately from primary admitted polytrauma patients